Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lyn said:
My problem with the football quotes was - if she's genuinely interested in it, then show it. When I talk about something I love, I get animated - my eyes sparkle, my hands flap, I talk faster. I show it. Random example - Mac in "Tanglewood" when he's talking about being in the Marines. When you love something, you can't help demonstrating it.
When you're reiterating something you've learned off by heart beacuse you had to, it sounds deadpan.
The football stats sounded deadpan. I'm sorry.
TheKidder3 said:
I'm a little surprised that people expressing an opinion is considered bashing that should sound a warning bell for democracy. I'm further surprised that people who haven't read this thread have declared it bashing, I call that interesting. It is a little like declaring Keynesian economic theory bashes a free market economy having only read one. Nevertheless, I digress.
I agree with everyone here that has taken Anna's performance to task. I've read in other threads, being a lurker, some theories on her up and mostly down performances; people first blamed the writers and now the directors. Sure, directors change and writers change, but no one else in the cast seems to have trouble maintaining excellent form with the ongoing switch, so that brings us back to Anna. I can't see the problem in telling someone that for part of the audience their performance is not good enough, if those are words she can't handle then she is in the wrong field, because critique comes with the territory. Unless you happen to be her manager, publicist, agent, sibling, friend, spouse, why take it to heart no one is criticizing you liking her, liking her performance, thinking she is cute or sweet. Though I would say wild animals are cute and sweet until they chew off your hand.
Can Anna up the bar and maintain good form in the future, well that remains to be seen, but if the past episodes are any indication the answer is no. What it comes down to is does the show need her, would it suffer without her? I don't know, but it is suffering with her. Her barely animated screen time could be passed onto Hill Harper, an actor more than worthy of some face time. Carmine could find is groove once again without being bothered with staged and annoying encounters that the writers are stabbing us in the eye with of late. Stella, an amazing woman, could whip all those men into shape and subdue the testosterone quotient all by herself. Eddie, brilliant in his delivery of wicked one-liners and portrayal of emotional distress could have more scenes. Then there is the mighty Sinese surely an actor of his proven caliber can recognize mediocrity.
I’m not convinced that the writers are solely at fault and I wonder if a better actor could have pulled off the role with greater success. Her emotional response is never what it should be, something I notice as a viewer. The writing issue comes into play during a scene where Lindsay is explaining her latest discovery in pained and drawn out detail, but I’m of the opinion that better acting could make even that quality a little endearing and quirky even. The attempts at flirting have to be stopped; they aren’t cute, interesting, or mutual. I’m not even sure it is actually Lindsay who has the crush, if you get my meaning, and Danny looks like he has had more than enough, but that could be Carmine, it could be me because I have had enough.
I wouldn’t throw a party if she left, but I would look forward to watching the show with some renewed vigor.
Never thought I’d be compelled to write so much.
Thanks,
f
xfcanadian said:
i love lindsy, i don't seem to notice her bad lines...i also don't think you can compare adian with her, since they are very different....
she is one of the few csi character's that actually make believalble scientists....i find the scientific stuff flows from her very well, and as for the way she talks, well, i do that too, when i am talking about anything, i try to take out emotion, and speak in scientific, logical terms. yeah, it probably is boring since i talk like i am a biology textbook, no matter what i am talking about, but i am a scientific person, and thats the approach i see coming from lindsey
the thing that really matters though, is the ratings. the first season was on the verge of being cancelled, and the second season is now up in the top 20, so whether or not it her character is bad or good, the ratings did take a huge increase, so she isn't going anywhere...
its really about perspective. i like lindsey, so i don't find her and danny's chemistry forced at all, i think they are cute together
also, she has had some great lines this season.... "I'll get my boots" lol, her and Mac work great together as well
but i didn't like adian at all, i found her annoying, so thats probably why i do like lindsey. i found adian's lines forced, like whenever she said anything scientific, it really wasn't believable that she actually knew what she was talking about. plus her accent was painful to listen to....danny's is borderline, but hers was thicker...i was actually pretty happy when i heard she was leaving
Gnimaerd said:
I don't think Lindsay is inadequate. I think she's not being given a chance by the writers to develop. Since CSI isn't a character-based show, the way the characters are developed is through interaction with others, and Lindsay will never develop whilst only interacting with Mac and Danny (which she mostly does, with occasional bits with Stella thrown in for good measure). I really, really want to see her develop a relationship with people outside Danny and Mac. D/L moments are cute, but frankly, that's not what I'm looking for in a character. My favourite 'ships are where both characters are strong and well-developed, and can stand on their own. I like D/L but I WILL loose interest if Lindsay doesn't start to branch out. I want to see her talk to Hawkes. I want to see her talk to Flack. I want to have her relationship with Stella developed. THEN we can think about what romantic relationships (if any) should be developed.
A lot of the posting here has made me think long and hard about why exactly Lindsay appeals to me, and, in turn, why others are so turned off by her. I boils down to this - Lindsay reminds me of myself. I'm a kid with an English accent in a Scottish school. For those who aren't from the UK, this is not a good thing. I stand out a mile. It's less of an issue now I'm older, people just don't care as much, but I know what it's like to feel completely out of place and out of depth and surrounded by people who look down on you.
Lindsay isn't an immediately likable character. To be blunt, she's a suck-up. She's foisted herself onto Mac, managing to get into his good books early on, because she's insecure and desperately wants approval from the man in charge. I didn't like her in her first few episodes, but frankly, that kinda made me more interested in her. I wanted to know why I didn't like her. Going over those first few moments again and again I realised that I didn’t like her for the same reason people don’t like me. She’s insecure so she’s being pretentious, a little too enthusiastic, too eager to please and generally over-zealous.
People mistake it for a weak, 2D character. It isn’t – she’s over-compensating for her insecurity by hiding it. I’ve seen 2D characters (I still watch Power Rangers, so I know 2D characters) and I’ve seen ones written who are protecting their weak spots (Horatio, Mac, Logan from Law and Order, Elizabeth from Stargate: Atlantis to name but a few) and Lindsay is being written as an insecure person who is covering herself by being over-enthusiastic.
Edit: Besides, who would they replace her with? Would you like the next character who came along? Do you want Aiden back ? Because Venessa Ferlito left of her own accord, so that really isn't going to happen (sad as that may be). Do you want them to just be a team with Stella as the only woman? 'Cause that seems like a horrible loss. People want Lindsay leave - have they thought about what would happen after her departure? (Seriously, I'm curious.)
Gnimaerd said:
I don't think Lindsay is inadequate. I think she's not being given a chance by the writers to develop. Since CSI isn't a character-based show, the way the characters are developed is through interaction with others, and Lindsay will never develop whilst only interacting with Mac and Danny (which she mostly does, with occasional bits with Stella thrown in for good measure). I really, really want to see her develop a relationship with people outside Danny and Mac. D/L moments are cute, but frankly, that's not what I'm looking for in a character. My favourite 'ships are where both characters are strong and well-developed, and can stand on their own. I like D/L but I WILL loose interest if Lindsay doesn't start to branch out. I want to see her talk to Hawkes. I want to see her talk to Flack. I want to have her relationship with Stella developed. THEN we can think about what romantic relationships (if any) should be developed.
Lindsay isn't an immediately likable character. To be blunt, she's a suck-up. She's foisted herself onto Mac, managing to get into his good books early on, because she's insecure and desperately wants approval from the man in charge. I didn't like her in her first few episodes, but frankly, that kinda made me more interested in her. I wanted to know why I didn't like her. Going over those first few moments again and again I realised that I didn’t like her for the same reason people don’t like me. She’s insecure so she’s being pretentious, a little too enthusiastic, too eager to please and generally over-zealous.
People mistake it for a weak, 2D character. It isn’t – she’s over-compensating for her insecurity by hiding it. I’ve seen 2D characters (I still watch Power Rangers, so I know 2D characters) and I’ve seen ones written who are protecting their weak spots (Horatio, Mac, Logan from Law and Order, Elizabeth from Stargate: Atlantis to name but a few) and Lindsay is being written as an insecure person who is covering herself by being over-enthusiastic.
Is it the best way to go about introducing a new character? No. Should the writers let her out of her shell a little more to let the viewers get to know (and like) her? Yes. But does that mean she’s useless, neigh, detrimental and should be thrown out before she even gets a chance.
Hell no.
And frankly, the ratings for this series of CSI New York have been consistently high, meeting and surpassing the bench mark set by last series. So I can’t honestly believe that Lindsay’s presence is having any noticeable effect on the quality of the show.
So I don’t think she should go. People who do can have their opinions, I accept – neigh, respect that. But I don’t think anything said here will make me agree with them. Some do have valid points – that Lindsay isn’t being expanded enough, that she doesn’t have enough interaction with other characters – but I don’t think that’s any reason to junk her. In fact, I think that’s a crappy one. The Lindsay thread here is active and has a healthy and growing population of posters and lurkers. She is loved and appreciated by many people here, and not just the D/L ‘shippers. Hundreds of fledgling fans will go into mourning should she depart - and could a new show like CSI:NY survive the loss of yet another main character, the second in as many years?
I honestly don’t think so.
Edit: Besides, who would they replace her with? Would you like the next character who came along? Do you want Aiden back ? Because Venessa Ferlito left of her own accord, so that really isn't going to happen (sad as that may be). Do you want them to just be a team with Stella as the only woman? 'Cause that seems like a horrible loss. People want Lindsay leave - have they thought about what would happen after her departure? (Seriously, I'm curious.)