^^^ That's how I saw it, ariela. I think Nick has a nice new dark-side wired into his brain now whether he wanted it or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
abharding said:
I can't see Catherine or Grissom subjecting him to it. They have been protecting him form those sorts of memories for the entire season.
I agree. There's actually been quite a few instances like this, where the circumstances are somewhat similar to "GD" and Nick's no where to be seen. For example I seem to remember there's one scene with Warrick and Doc opening a coffin early on in the season; Nick's not there even though he was working with them. But I can't for the life of me remember the episode. Maybe I made that up..?allstar12 said:
Baba, the scene from "Still Life" comes to mind, when Sara, Greg and Warrick are undigging the backyard looking for a little boys body beyond a suspect's house. After the episode aired, someone pointed out that Nick wasn't there because it might've been painful for him to search for a buried body..
SKYLAR522 said:
I haven't seen any obvious mention that Nick shouldn't be on the team when they're recovering a buried/entombed body. It's just seemed more like coincidence that aside from Gum Drops (which he led on) he hasn't been on a body retrieval. In this case it seemed logical that since Sara was with Catherine when they determined the chimney measurement didn't match up, then it was Sara who took Catherine back to the house to check it out.
Wasn't it interesting that it was Nick who basically slipped up with identifying the burned corpse as the owner of the gym card? Nick said it BELONGED to the body it was on. Nick has been uber professional of late but in Up in Smoke he was sloppy and assumed the one card found on the burnt corpse identified the body.
And just like in early seasons, Grissom caught the mistake when the Sibley son was on the gas station tape. Grissom immediately questioned if Nick was sure he got the right tape and Nick went on the defensive.
In the end, the mistake didn't hurt the case. In fact, it helped them snare Sibley who believed that his son was dead.
But Nick's screw up did give Grissom the upper hand for the first time since DLG.
BabaOReilly said: This is not CSI:Nick Stokes after all!
BabaOReilly said:
And in the end, the error with the ID served it's purpose- Catherine got to use it to her advantage when she basically got the guilty father to implicate his son because he still thought he was dead, and then she got the satisfaction of seeing him squirm when he found out he was still alive. A small measure of justice for the victim and her poor father. Now, was there any significance to them using Nick as their fall guy to work that whole ID thing into the plot? It's hard to say. I'd say that other than that brief weird moment near the chimney with David and the burnt body, Nick was pretty much on his game this episode. And again, Grissom didn't seem to be placing blame, since clearly they all made the same wrong assumption...