Re: CSI Ratings versus Grey's Anatomy
xfcanadian you can rationalize it all you want, but that doesn't make a storyline about a younger female sleeping with her boss any less of a chiche.
That's a very convenient way to word things, as it suggests that it doesn't matter what skillful argument anyone uses to explain why they think your conclusion is wrong; it'll just be dismissed as "rationalization" anyway, allowing people to feel comfortable with not changing their minds for any reason no matter how logical or compelling that reason might be. Despite that, I'm going to give it a shot.
My biggest problem with your statement is that if "cliche" is going to be used as
that blunt of an instrument, then just about every single plot point out there is cliche by now. There really is nothing new under the sun, because if you're going to stick to believable writing then you're limited as to your options.
For example, had Grissom dated a younger woman outside of work, or a woman of his own age in the workplace, or out of the workplace, or an older woman in the workplace, or out of the workplace, or played the field, or had stayed on his own without dating anyone, or discovered he was gay and in the closet... look around, and you'll find tons of stories where the protagonist does the same. Therefore, using your definition of "cliche", the writers couldn't have Grissom do
anything that wouldn't be "cliche", because every single option has already been played out a hundred times in millions of other stories. So if "cliche" is used as broadly as you use it, it no longer has any meaning. Everything's cliche. You might as well give up reading/watching/listening to stories altogether.
What really makes a plotline cliche, IMO, are the details. If it plays out like every other story to the point where you can rattle off what's going to happen next, then it's cliche. Grissom and Sara constantly bantering and arguing and bitching to mask their sexual attraction? Cliche. (Sorry Hodges and Wendy, but I'll give you guys a pass seeing as you had about twenty seconds to establish your dynamic.) Grissom and Sara barely speaking about anything other than the case but using body language to show how they are in sync? Not cliche.
Grissom and Sara agonizing over their issues for a maximum of five episodes before heading for the money shot? Cliche. Grissom and Sara taking five years to deal with their own private issues before they're in a good place to date each other? Not cliche.
Grissom and Sara bantering/arguing/bitching until their big kiss and they fall into bed together? Cliche. Grissom and Sara taking six years to work themselves up into a relationship and then we don't see anything more intimate than lounging around in a bathrobe/godawful shirt and a shaving scene? Not cliche.
Grissom and Sara making out at the office behind closed doors or the janitorial closet? Cliche. Grissom and Sara not even having shared a kiss on screen, despite dating for nearly a year that we know of (and probably closer to two)? Not cliche.
Grissom and Sara constantly going up and down on the angst rollercoaster to manufacture "drama" for the people at home? Cliche. Grissom and Sara only interacting in a work context except for little slivers of domestic bliss here and there? Not cliche.
The devil is in the details. It's not the basic plotlines that make a story cliche, as every single plotline has been done to death anyway. It's not even in the details themselves, really, as you'll find stories everywhere with those exact same details. It's the particular mix of detail, and the way that the actors/directors/set designers mix those details, that make a story original.
This is precisely what I see going wrong with
Grey's Anatomy these days. It really used to be unpredictable - other than Mer-Der, of course, which is about as "cliche" as they come (still fun to watch for most people, I'll admit). But it's like since they rocketed to stardom in the second season, the third season has been all about creating the SHOCKING!MOMENT!s that everybody discussed around the watercooler in Season 2.
The SHOCKING!MOMENT!s worked in Season 2 because they served the story and not the other way around.
Grey's was good, solid storytelling, with a SHOCKING!MOMENT! here and there to make your jaw drop and cause you to do nothing at work the next day except chat and make you impatient for next Sunday. But with Season 3, it's like they're trying to think of every SHOCKING!MOMENT! they can think of, and then building a story around it so that they have an excuse to show it. I can't tell you who has slept with who or who is sleeping with who now; the shortest way to put it is "They've all done each other."
Cliche is precisely what's wrong with
Grey's these days... just think of the most preposterous storyline, and sure enough, it gets brought up. (The most recent one, judging from the promos, is a prime example.) And if Shonda & Co. don't turn their ship around soon, I predict that sometime in the next season (and possibly even in this one) you
are going to see a ratings drop. Just about everyone I know, online or not, is disillusioned with
Grey's these days, and it's only a matter of time before that's reflected in the ratings.
This is quite different from
CSI, which has actually delighted a lot of people this season... and no, not just the GSR-shippers, either. When professional critics like Matt Roush of
TV Guide and Ken Tucker of
Entertainment Weekly make a point of writing reviews about how good
CSI is this season, I think it's safe to say that it's more than just the wishful hopes of Geek Lovers at work here. But, speaking of that devil, what
CSI has done with Grissom and Sara is truly original. I'd challenge anyone to find me a story that has done this plotline in the exact same manner as
CSI has done... same details, same themes, everything.