For the record gang, I did'nt say that George Eads should be let go just to save Jorja's job. I love all the characters and my partial reason for enjoying GSR is because Billy has in the past played roles where he was usually a very passionate kind of man and it seemed odd to me that the writers of CSI would make Grissom too much of a science nerd to have any kind of romantic/sexual relationship.
The age thing is a matter for the two people involved, if they have no difficulties with it then it's case closed. As to Grissom being her supervisior, if that was truly a factor to concerned about, wouldn't it have made sense to have some scene where Ecklie does a employee seminar on 'sexual harrasment in the workplace' or something like it?
Besides, were'nt Catherine and Warrick this close to having 'a thing going on' nobody seemed upset that a gambling addict and, sorry for this, a woman who seems attracted mostly to men who treat her badly* being in a possible relationship.
They both have their fair share of emotional baggage, the whole group seems to, short of Greg Sanders and Sophia Curtis. Relationships in the workplace, good or bad do happen, it's difficult to work that closely with others in such an emotionally-charged atmosphere like solving criminal cases that may reflect on a person's attitude about themselves and their past/present problems in their lives.
This can have it's affect on how the team treats each other both personally and professionally, just my thoughts here nothing written in stone.
*I love Marg Helgenberger and how she plays Catherine, the writers have at times done her a disservice by making her someone who in spite of being able to rise above her past as a stripper and become a CSI, they make her far too vulnerable to jerky men she encounters on the job.
but I tune in to see everyone. If there's an episode without one of them, I miss them and hope they'll be in the next week's episode. 
