CSI:NY Season 6 Spoiler Discussion - This City Never Sleeps

Status
Not open for further replies.
^^I think they might use the baby as a way to get the audience worried ("Oh noez, not the baybeeee!", etc :p), but I seriously doubt they'd go there. Not on this show.

But hey, I could be wrong. :shifty:

By the way, I've figured out who Lindsay reminds me of in those pictures. Martha Stewart. Don't tell me Martha wouldn't be all over that outfit.

MR T PITIES THE FOO' THAT TRIES TO LOOK LIKE MARTHA!

bp454202.jpg

Danny just looks like one of the ambiguously gay neighbors Ina Garten invites over for brunch at her house in the Hamptons on Food Network every week.

Dear Danny and Lindsay,

Y'all just look straight-up ridiculous...unless you are going to go hang out with the Barefoot Contessa on your vacation, in which case I apologize, do carry on.

Sincerely yours,
Fay

:p
 
LOL Danny looks like he's going to one of those prestigious Country Clubs to play golf or something. :lol: What was the wardrobe department thinking? Those clothes are very un-Danny like. :lol: He's dressed more like Danny Tanner than Danny Messer. Heh.
 
sick.gif
on the whole happy-family image. And the outfits; although I can live with everything except that sweater.

Top41 said:
Nothing we don't already know, but...
Do you know who the writers are for the ‘CSI: NY‘ finale this season, and also the Mac-centric/Peyton returns episode? – Jayne
‘CSI: NY’ exec producer/headwriter Pam Veasey penned the ‘Rear Window’-y May 19th episode in which Claire Forlani returns as Peyton Driscoll. The following week, the season-ending “Vacation Getaway” comes to you courtesy of Trey Callaway (who last wrote “Pot of Gold”) and Zachary Reiter (”Uncertainty Rules”).
From Fancast
Weirdly enough, I think this is going to be the first season finale since COtP that's not at least partially written by one of the showrunners (ie, Lenkov or Veasey. I don't know if the showrunners have changed lately). Also, I think Zachary Reiter helped to write "Hostage", so...Not sure if this raises or lowers my expectations for this finale (Hostage wasn't exactly a favourite episode of mine).
 
O.K. with all of this Mac and Aubry frenzy and the big "Triangle" situation according to the credits, Aubry and Peyton are not even in the same episode together:rolleyes: So how exciting is THAT suppose to be? Even though as stated earlier Aubry has not been in that much of her episodes, the obnoxious spoiler expectancy theory, which is where my complaint generated from the first place was all for naught, for what good is a triangle without a good catfight, which always brings out the "best" in ones character!:lol:
 
Maybe Shane is in love with Danny and mighty pissed off that he's taken up with some girl from Montana and has a kid.:lol::lol:

LOL, I can see it now: Shane tries to force himself on Danny and Flack comes crashing through the window of that lighthouse with a sword going, "OH HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!" Then, in a bit of cosmic justice, Flack decapitates Shane... the same way Shane killed his first victim. :lol:

Seriously, though, why is he targeting Danny? Because Danny told him the truth about his brother? Because Danny put him away? Because Danny was sympathetic towards him when he arrested him (both times) but never visited him in jail, and Shane feels betrayed?

That's what I'm hoping there's a really good explanation for. Because Shane just suddenly blaming Danny for everything that's happened to him when Danny was actually kind to Shane makes no sense. Seriously, Shane having the hots for Danny and wanting to get in his pants makes more sense than him suddenly blaming Danny for everything. :rolleyes:

You know what I'd like? A season finale without a cliffhanger, just a really good episode (the first 3 finales were really good I thought, especially Snow Day) with lots of action, some good stuff for all the team, and then it all gets sorted (perhaps not entirely, perhaps a thread or two - like with the s2 finale, we knew Flack was probably going to make it, but not if/when he'd be returning to duty, with s1 there was the interest of Hawkes becoming a CSI) and ends on a conclusive, non-hangery note. This ep sounds like it's going to be a bit of a 'who will survive' (this time out of D/L/L, presumably) and they did that last season. I think it's perfectly possible to have a brilliant season finale without it being a cliffhanger - Snow Day being a prime example!

The problem with "who will survive" cliffhangers is that there's rarely any real suspense to them. If the person in jeopardy doesn't die before the cliffhanger ending, they're going to survive the resolution. Think about it... when does the conclusion to a cliffhanger ever end with everyone racing to save the day... only to find the person they were trying to save dead? It just doesn't happen that way... at least not on a show that doesn't take big risks. I love CSI: NY, but it's not that show.

Nothing we don't already know, but...

Do you know who the writers are for the ‘CSI: NY‘ finale this season, and also the Mac-centric/Peyton returns episode? – Jayne
‘CSI: NY’ exec producer/headwriter Pam Veasey penned the ‘Rear Window’-y May 19th episode in which Claire Forlani returns as Peyton Driscoll. The following week, the season-ending “Vacation Getaway” comes to you courtesy of Trey Callaway (who last wrote “Pot of Gold”) and Zachary Reiter (”Uncertainty Rules”).
From Fancast
What an odd question. :confused:

It is kind of an odd question, but cool to see someone asking about the writers. :cool:

^^I think they might use the baby as a way to get the audience worried ("Oh noez, not the baybeeee!", etc :p), but I seriously doubt they'd go there. Not on this show.

Agreed. There are some shows that would kill a baby, but not CSI: NY. One of the parents, maybe, but if Danny and Lindsay are both alive when the hour ends, I think it's a pretty safe bet that they'll survive the season premiere, too.

By the way, I've figured out who Lindsay reminds me of in those pictures. Martha Stewart. Don't tell me Martha wouldn't be all over that outfit.

MR T PITIES THE FOO' THAT TRIES TO LOOK LIKE MARTHA!

bp454202.jpg

Lindsay's wardrobe continues to be very unflattering. I thought they dressed her cute in seasons two and three, but since then, she's dressed like a 40-50 year old suburbanite.

Danny just looks like one of the ambiguously gay neighbors Ina Garten invites over for brunch at her house in the Hamptons on Food Network every week.

I think the orange sweater just killed any vestiges of Danny's hotness. :( Remember when he used to be really sexy, with that passionate, fiery personality and those white shirts? I really miss that Danny.

Dear Danny and Lindsay,

Y'all just look straight-up ridiculous...unless you are going to go hang out with the Barefoot Contessa on your vacation, in which case I apologize, do carry on.

Sincerely yours,
Fay

:p

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Maybe Shane is in love with Danny and mighty pissed off that he's taken up with some girl from Montana and has a kid.:lol::lol:

LOL, I can see it now: Shane tries to force himself on Danny and Flack comes crashing through the window of that lighthouse with a sword going, "OH HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!" Then, in a bit of cosmic justice, Flack decapitates Shane... the same way Shane killed his first victim. :lol:

That would be brilliant!:lol:





The problem with "who will survive" cliffhangers is that there's rarely any real suspense to them. If the person in jeopardy doesn't die before the cliffhanger ending, they're going to survive the resolution. Think about it... when does the conclusion to a cliffhanger ever end with everyone racing to save the day... only to find the person they were trying to save dead? It just doesn't happen that way... at least not on a show that doesn't take big risks. I love CSI: NY, but it's not that show.
I agree. When Horatio was 'killed' in that Miami finale, I was pretty sure he wasn't dead, so the 'cliffhanger' aspect for me was more to do with what the hell was actually going on, than whether H would 'survive' or not. And I agree that if they don't die before the cliffhanger ending, they're probably going to survive the resolution. That we haven't heard about any of the main cast leaving also suggests the cliffhanger probably won't be a 'who will survive', and if it was, well they did that last season, to do it again would be too soon - the other 4 finales, though they all had the 'character(s) in peril' aspect were quite different - ok, s1 and s2 and s4 finales were Mac-centric, but in each one the 'dangerous situation' he was in was different, and the team were involved in different ways.
The 'who will survive' cliffhanger was pretty good last year, I really was waiting to find out who had survived, and to do it again the season after would be a bit 'meh'.
But I guess we should wait and see, it could be fantastic. I'd love another 'Snow Day' type finale though - something that puts all the team in danger and makes them have to work together to save themselves and possibly others, but with a conclusive ending. Snow Day was awesome.
 

Hey, is Danny and Lindsay going to a italian restaurant in this episode? Hehe, I think Danny overused the spray-on tan a bit there! And when did Lindsay dye her hair blonde? Wait, where's the baby? The baby! OH MY GOD!!! SHAAAAAAAANEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!! :eek::eek::eek::eek:

:rolleyes:
 
You guys are cracking me up. :lol:

I love the bit about Shane being in love with Danny and Don and Shane fight over him.... I seriously almost spit out my water!

Same with the picture of Mac in the helicopter... that was priceless.

I think the real comedy here is the fact that the finale is getting predictable.
Something is going to happen to someone. :rolleyes:
But now there are more than just Danny and Lindsey involved. They have to throw in the baby. Which sets me off too because it's really not necessary.

I think they might use the baby as a way to get the audience worried ("Oh noez, not the baybeeee!", etc :p), but I seriously doubt they'd go there. Not on this show.
^^ is exactly what I'm thinking too.

I guess we'll have to wait and see.
 
Shane trying to get a piece of Danny's action makes way more sense than the idea of him seeking revenge on Danny when Danny did nothing but try to help him find the truth about his brother.

I get that Shane probably didn't like that truth, but breaking out of jail just to shoot the messenger seems a little extreme. :rolleyes: And far-fetched.
 
Shane trying to get a piece of Danny's action makes way more sense than the idea of him seeking revenge on Danny when Danny did nothing but try to help him find the truth about his brother.

I get that Shane probably didn't like that truth, but breaking out of jail just to shoot the messenger seems a little extreme. :rolleyes: And far-fetched.

Agreed. And it all makes me wonder what the writers are thinking.
 
I don't think that the season finale is going to top Snow Day at all.
This episode is by far the best season finale of every shows I have watched.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top