OMG, so much to read and reply to! :lol:
carolina said:
what I dont understand is why it is OK to dislike Lindsay because of Danny and its weird to like her because of him. it seems a little unfair
People can like or dislike a character for whatever reasons they choose, and I don't think anybody has to defend or justify why they feel that way--if they join a discussion, reasons become important or else the discussion goes nowhere ('I like it,' 'I don't like it', 'I like it', 'I don't like it' ad nauseum), but nobody is
forced to share their reasons. Nobody
has to take part in a debate or discussion.
Anyway, that's going off-topic a bit, but the point is that people can like Lindsay because of Danny, or vice versa, but saying that Lindsay should "stay" because of him isn't about Lindsay at all, which is the point of the thread. (I think I'm talking in circles with that one. :lol
I thought we are talking opinions, not facts here
Of course we're talking opinions. Even if I don't preface everything I say with, "The following is my opinion:" or "I think", or if I don't end every sentence with "IMO", I'm still just saying what
I think. 'Lindsay is irritating' or what-have-you is obviously an opinion.
Elsie said:
I don't agree that Lindsay brought light to the show. The light was already there by then.
I don't understand the idea that Lindsay brought a 'lightness' or anything like that to the show. I think the differences between season one and season two that 'lightened' the show come down to two things:
1) The sets and the colors (the latter of which was changed midway through the first season)--season two had more light in the lab, more color on the walls, more color in the wardrobes, etc.
2.) The cases. Season one had more gritty, realistic cases and less ridiculous, look-at-them-crazy-rich-white-folks cases. (Personally, I think they need to mix in a bit of what they removed to give the show some more of the reality they stripped away.)
Season one wasn't lacking wit, it wasn't lacking humor, it wasn't lacking sparking character interactions--and Lindsay certainly didn't single-handedly change the entire show. Watching the first few episodes of season 2, before Lindsay even arrived, shows that the same differences were already there. If someone prefers Lindsay's interaction with people over Aiden's, for example, that's one thing, but she didn't turn the lights on.
1CSIMfan said:
I was shocked when Hammerback told Lindsay that Danny had a crush on her because it never appeared that way to me.
If I recall correctly, that was before you'd even started talking to us on the board, wasn't it? So you weren't influenced by anything like the WLMG thread, just your own opinions.
Heh, that makes me think of Torchwood, where 'retcon' is used to wipe people's memories, so I'm assuming it has a similar meaning here.
*Googles*
retcon: To retroactively change the continuity of a character or title.
carolina said:
she tried to prove a point. you dont know Mac as well as you think. it showed she had observation skills - she is a CSI after all. it wasnt like she pulled a file and stalked Mac to find something on him
She felt the need to prove to Danny, who had known Mac for years, that she could find out things Danny didn't know about him--and she felt the need to prove this because Danny thought Mac was genuinely amused by his pun and Lindsay thought he wasn't. That sounds slightly snobby to me. "Look, you may have known him longer, but I knew this before you. Ta-dah!" Also, she kind of
did have to stalk him. How many clubs are there in New York City? Knowing that Mac plays guitar and has a standing appointment on Wednesday nights is hardly enough to pinpoint his exact location. Personally, I think it's more creepy than cute that she went to all of that trouble just to prove that she could (and
would) go to that much trouble to one-up Danny...
Kimmychu said:
Lindsay is a regular character on the main cast. Ideally by now (after over two years!), she should be a well-developed, independant character.
That's something I've noticed. The things that were 'great' about her character when she first arrived are pretty much the same things that people say are 'great' about her now (wasn't that 'breath of fresh air', 'new perspective' stuff straight from official press releases and the like?). Nothing wrong with that, but shouldn't there be
more by this point? After two years with considerable screentime and storylines for development, shouldn't there be more to like about her?
Surreal_44 said:
Those are statements of opinion robed in a fancy title to make it seem like they are more valid and right and important.
Guess what, sweetheart? That applies to you, too. You keep talking about this analysis you're spending time on as if it's somehow more 'valid and right and important' than the rest of us watching the show and forming opinions.
Anytime someone posts that they like Lindsay, or give a reason why, the pack of Lindsay's haters attack
Do you think the Lindsay fans can't defend themselves? (News flash: they
can.) Do you think they're too stupid to form their opinions or analyze the facts? (New flash number 2: they're
not.) You make a point of continuing to say that you're not really a fan of the character, but here you come, time and again, acting like you're the only one capable of holding the Lindsay banner in this make-believe battle.
I'm tired of being told that I "attack" people just because I disagree and don't hesitate to say so. If someone wants to like Lindsay and not hear opposing viewpoints, they're well within their rights to do so. However, discussion threads probably aren't the place to post and not expect differing opinions. Welcome to a discussion thread. Posting is optional.
Also, if you don't want comments about your 'character analysis' before you post it, it would help if you didn't keep talking about it and all the ways it's going to be the strictly-canon, my-opinion-is-better-then-yours, super spicy awesome-sauce.