I don't understand how you can say that scenes are all open to interpertation yet insist that you know exactly what the writers had in mind when they wrote them. *shrug*
I don't think I said ALL scenes. I said SOME OF THEM, and those scenes that seem blurry to me...I don't stick to just one interpretation and say that I'm 100% right. Why shrug for that?
As far as the ES quote, I've never read that anywhere. Everything I've read in regards to Greg/Sara from ES has been positive. He's been campaigning for it since season 2.
I read ES's quote about that sometime ago, but forgot to save it so I don't have it on my PC to post it here...so leave it to that. And about the campaigning thing...he campaigned about his crush on Sara I think...not a relationship with her. Now if they've changed their plan then I'm unaware of that.
As for Sara in a relationship outside of CSI, where's the fun in that? We don't know this mystery character, why should we care about them?
Won't it be enough if we're let known that Sara is with a nice guy and they're happy?
Can't the romance thing involving the key character be out of the CSI department for once?
SMI, you keep saying Sara's love is unconditional. What does that mean exactly?
I mean she doesn't judge Grissom for not being able to have a relationship with her.
If you remember the little talk at the end of 'Snakes,' Sara confessed her feelings for Grissom, and when Grissom was about to say sth, "let's....", Sara sensed it(whatever it is) and said, "It's okay." You see she understands how Grissom feels and she's fine with it. She's not complaining. That's why I call it unconditional love.
I find it so unfair when people say that once Grissom realizes his feelings for Sara, she will be waiting for him.
Who said that? I am sure I didn't. What I'm saying is that Grissom is not blind to his feelings for Sara, and he knows how Sara feels. He's not a perfect person; he's got his own issues that we don't know of. So, how can we judge his behavior like that? How can you say, "he's not man enough" without knowing what he's dealing with?
What does that kind of commitment means to Grissom?
Honestly, would you have said Nick coward if he had pulled the trigger on him while inside the Plexiglas when he realized he's being eaten alive? (it's a rhetorical question btw and don't bother if you didn't get the logical connection I'm trying to make here).
You have to see what situation you're dealing with and what it means to that person. Who is better, the person who marries soon to be divorced early or a person who takes his time and reach a forever-stable decision?
Sara is a complicated person...even for Grissom. After five years of working together, Grissom knew about Sara's dad just a couple of months ago.... and slowly Sara is opening to him...which probably means she's healing and trusting him more.
Again, why does "I don't know what do to about this" is rated as being so angsty?
Because it is. And it is not 'SO' angsty...it is just not so simple as you're trying say it is.
As for Greg...he makes her laugh. He cares about what is happening to her. He asks her how she is doing. He practically was willing to raise a picket line to get Sara off her suspension.
So why didn't Greg go to visit Sara after she was suspended, I wonder.
Did his care get shut down because Cath said 'no'? Honestly, after hearing Greg and Cath's conversation, I thought that Greg would go to Sara's apartment or give her a call or sth. I mean nobody except Grissom!!! That was a bummer.
(BTW I don't doubt Greg cares for Sara; I'm just writing this cause you seem to think that Greg cares for Sara enough to be in relationship with her). You know, Sara and Nick used to have same kind of interaction before the split. They used to laugh, joke and care for each other (I don't mean they don't now though). I just don't see any romantic tension between Sara and Greg. They care for each other..they're playful and occasionally flirty, period. That's not enough to hook them up. Not for me at least.
I have been mad at Grissom a lot of times for not doing anything, but I won't call him stupid or unmanly without hearing his side of story.
As for the interviews of JF and ES..it's their opinion and I won't comment on it. I just remembered ES's quote or sth and mentioned it. Of course they love to work with each other. Who won't? But that's not the answer to the relationship on the show.
Now I'm not an expert in relationship on this kind of show or in real life, and I'm just analyzing what I understood and saw. All those stuffs I wrote are about past and my take on them. Now if they have planned sth else relationship-wise then I'm not a clairvoyant to predict it. I can't even speculate at this point. I won't be surprised if they take Sara/Greg route, but whatever they do, I just want them to resolve GSR (from Grissom's POV that is). Surely CSI won't be the same without GSR (for ppl like me), but well if Zuiker thinks CSI can go on without Grissom then I don't want to seemed like a fool saying CSI cannot go without GSR.
PS- Well I havn't forgotten that CSI is just a TV show...and our opinions won't matter a bit.. and I'm cool about it. BTW don't be offended in anyway. I'm sorry if I did. I know you guys love and care for Sara and that's enough for me.