Thank you for the update
Destiny.
Monster In A Box
Argh! I really shouldn't wait this long to post my thoughts. I should've posted when it was still all fresh in my mind.
I liked Grissoms reaction to the package and the camera angle. I thought it was very effective. Also, Catherine’s comment about "where's the fire" added to the moment, which I liked.
I swear when I posted about Loco Motives I mentioned that I didn't know whether they thought Ernie was the MCSK as it was very unclear. Okay, so it turns about we were all supposed to think that it was Ernie who was the killer? Well, I for one must have gone temporarily deaf during
Loco Motives and
Monster In A Box because I didn't hear Ernie confess. Yes, he was recorded before he died talking about life and such, but when the hell did he confess to it? It seemed to me that Ernie just wanted to end his life and having him accused of the murder just pushed him over the edge. I'm very surprised that the CSI's presumed that Ernie was the killer, because that's what it seemed like, that they just presumed because he made models and becuase someone was caught on CCTV wearing a jacket with his company came on. Now, I'm no CSI, but I thought it would have been quite obvious, considering how smart this killer is, that he was unlikely to wear his own jacket with his own company name on whilst delivering the model to a doorstep. Maybe I'm been overly critical, but I feel that the CSI's are underestimating the killer.
So, now with the message of YOU WERE WRONG on the pictures we can be lead to believe that this guy is trying to tell a story or trying to make the CSI's understand his story. Reminds me a little of Paul Millander.
As for the stake out, another example of the killer being underestimated, I knew full well that he wasn't going to show up, that much was obvious. When Brass was sitting in the lobby on the look out, I thought maybe I was overestimating the killer because I really thought that someone should have given the FED-EX guy a little more attention. Anyway, as it turns out, the killer, as I predicted initially, didn't show as he had no reason to show (and I agree with
Elsie that they should have picked up on the carbon monoxide before). I figured that he expected the CSI to foil the murder, as that appeared to be his intention by giving fore warning.
What I can't work out is whether the MCSK knew that Grissom was on sabbatical and that he would have limited time to work it out or whether he had no idea and intended to give Grissom weeks to work it out. If it's the first than I could argue that it would have to be someone very close to Grissom (someone in the lab), but given that the killer could predict what a cat would do, I can't say I'm surprised he would know Grissom was on sabbatical. The guy seems to know everything.
I really felt for Sophia in this episode, poor girl. She was clearly very upset.
As for the Cat murder, I found it quite hard. I also felt that there was no need to show the cat on the autopsy table whilst Dr Robbins was on the phone.
Argh, I want to know who this is and I want to be surprised by who it is. I don't want to be disappointed with it being some random architect, who visits a shrink, who has OCD and doesn't like music by Izzy. I know that chances of me being happy with the outcome are less than 5% and the outcome of it being someone in the lab is less than 1%, but I wish TPTB would shock me. I would really like it to be someone we know.
Overall 9/10