S_Bright said:
Keeping the relationship under covers is the biggest teenagy thing ever. If they wanted a relationship they should have been mature enough to face the consequences because in their line of work, a subordinate cannot date a supervisor. And having the (albeit very wobbly) MCsK storyline end in this is hilariously cheap and tacky. It's just so moronic the entire credibility falls flat to its face when these are supposed to both be well over 30. Instead of being mature about it they go Romeo and Juliet and try to hide it? This entire story line is getting so stupid I can't but laugh at it any longer.
Since when was it established that she wanted to kill Sara? And if she did and is the genius she's made out to be, why take a chance with the floods? Doesn't make any sense at all that one. This is writing so below par that any fanficcer could have done it better.
Forecasts are about 60/40 in probability - a weeks forecast is even less accurate. If she even thought about it, it was pure chance. This is no longer a scientific show, this is pure soap ala Grey's Anatomy.
Sorry for posting this soon but I was asked to respond.
Well, nice response. I gotta hand it to you.
I don't agree with your opinion about the secret relationship, cause I think they did what they thought was right considering the fact that they wanted to be together and they loved working together. In a way they wanted to have the cake and eat it too, that's true, but still... their behavior at work was very professional (after all, no one noticed anything).
Natalie always wanted to kill all her victims. It was always her goal. To kill the victims. So it's safe to assume that she wants to kill Sara. She's just doing the same thing she did in Monster In A Box. Giving the team (especially Grissom) a chance to save the victim.
CSI has never been accurate in it's scientific stuff (as we all know). This is a drama show. They have some liberties. If they want to say that Natalie had a magic finger that whenever it hurt, she knew it was going to rain, they have that liberty (although if that happened, I would crash my tv
). I'm really not the kind that sees a show and worries about the technicality. All I care about is having an hour of entertainment. And CSI certainly entertains me. Whether a dna analysis takes an hour or a week, it doesn't really matter to me. So, whether it's possible to know when it's going to rain in the mountains or not really isn't important to me. If that was important to me, I'd watch discovery channel or something. But that's just me, someone who has watched too many soap operas to count. At this moment, CSI is like discovery channel compared to the soap operas I watched before.