lemon_grass
CSI Level Two
Re: Post - "Grave Danger" Episode Discussion/Review ***Spoi
That's a very interesting point you made, I've never noticed it before, either. I wonder if the writers did it on purpose, if so, the amount of thought and layers of detail that went into this episode is just amazing.
Oh darn, now I want to watch the episode again, and my tape is already wearing out... Okay, maybe it was an old tape to begin with, but still.
Welcome Chorusgirl!Hi! I'm brand-new here and rather late to the party but this is the episode that turned me from a casual viewer to a real fan of the show. Just wanted to share some thoughts with folks who seem to be as affected by it as I was. Just wanted to add my two cents on the topic of Nick's relationship with his dad. IMHP, I think the writers were doing their darndest to show that Nick and his dad have a close and probably very warm relationship and I'd be very surprised if it played out any other way. First, of course, there are the nicknames which both of them still use. Not just any nicknames but those of inseparable buddies. But you can hear more concrete proof in the way that Papa Stokes refers to Nick. It's a theme that goes all through the episode - the "possessive" as a term of, well, I guess endearment is the best word. Papa Stokes never refers to Nick by his name. He always refers to him as "my boy" or "my son". It's so much a part of him that Nick even hears it in his hallucination (when Papa Stokes asks Dr. Al "how'd my boy die?"). I've always felt that when someone used the possessive in that way they're referring to someone precious to them. (I'm lucky enough to say that's how it is in my family). Later you hear the same thing with Grissom. After several go-arounds with Walter, Grissom finally gets fed up and snarls "where's my guy?" It's such a clear indicator of affection that Walter calls Gil on it immediately. And then there's that heartbreaking "I want my guys back" from Gil at the end.
Well, pretty long first post. Thanks for listening!
That's a very interesting point you made, I've never noticed it before, either. I wonder if the writers did it on purpose, if so, the amount of thought and layers of detail that went into this episode is just amazing.
Oh darn, now I want to watch the episode again, and my tape is already wearing out... Okay, maybe it was an old tape to begin with, but still.