Re: Writers Strike - Is it going to have an effect on TV sho
*agrees with
maple*
It was inevitable that people would lose their jobs as a result of the strike. No business would continue to pay people for doing nothing. If there is nothing to do, and no revenue to be made from them then really there is no reason to keep them on. I think there was a quote somewhere from Julia Louis Dreyfus (if that's the right name), where she said that she was joining the picket line and considering the fate of those people who work on her show, such as the hair and make up artists that will be facing a very bad holiday season indeed, struggling to make ends meet and that some people would be losing their homes as a result of the strike. It is often the people who are most vulnerable, and can't in any way influence the strikes that will fall first.
In a way that is why it annoys me the most that those on the picket lines aren't protesting peacefully, but (and whilst I understand why it still irks me) are deliberately disrupting the shooting of other shows and berating those who dare to cross the lines. Non unionised workers, or workers in a completely different, currently not on strike union themselves, or those on shows that could still go ahead and still have episodes to shoot should be allowed to work without fear of accusations and reprisals. After all it is their livelihoods and their families that will suffer when they lose their jobs.
I have said it in the NY thread, but there is more than one story going on here. There is no way of really knowing all the issues and all the sticking points and it's easy to think that the producers and studios should just give the writers what they deserve. But what is deserved? Is asking for double the amount they currently receive for DVD sales fair or deserved? Well, what does everyone else get? And if this was agreed wouldn't it just set a precedence for the SAG negotiations and the Directors Guild negotiations in the future? So presumably in the end it is the consumer that will end up paying for it.
I don't know either way, and I know it is actually much more complex than that. The residuals payments for internet downloads etc are all important and valuable forms of revenue and it would be frustrating and unfair to not be paid fairly for those as well, but whilst the writers do essentially create our favourite characters, the actors actually bring that to life on screen, and the directors make each episode work and make it look right, and those people behind the scenes that we don't appreciate or notice who make it happen. Who 'deserves' a bigger share? No one person or sector is responsible for the shows, but they all deserve a fair share and the right to reasonable negotiation, but it is a two way thing. And it's not as simple as just giving in, in my opinion, agreeing with one side or the other. We're probably in for the long haul with this one and it'll get worse (as will both sides propaganda I'm sure) before it gets better.