IMO, the posts by
Adamsgirl,
D&D Addict and
snowbunny have highlighted a bit of a double-standard that some forum-members seem to apply only to certain castmembers (a bit unfairly, in my view). And in my months of posting (and years of lurking) on this forum, I've noticed something that might account for it: A number of posters lamenting Eddie's departure from the show and personally blaming Adam and/or the E/C romance for it, claim to take issue with having a romance on CSIM or having it featured so prominently on the show. (I personally disagree with this viewpoint, but a several anti-EC-shippers have expressed it, so it's only fair that I raise it here). However, I've noticed from browsing around the forum that quite a few of the people complaining the loudest about the E/C romance and championing the cause of getting rid of Eric and/or Calleigh and replacing them with new characters, are supporters of other, non-canon 'ships like DuCaine, EDeN, CarWash, etc.
This leads me to wonder whether these folks would want fresh blood or be complaining about Eric/Calleigh or the romance being played-out if it was their favorite 'ship that was canon on the show rather than E/C. (Regardless of how the romance was written, how much screen-time was given to it, etc., etc.). Against this backdrop, some of the comments about Eddie seem to be little more than pretexts. In some ways, poor Eddie has become the pawn for certain anti-E/C-shippers who are apparently uncomfortable being straightforward about why they don't like Eric/Adam, Calleigh/Emily, or the E/C romance, i.e., because they support non-canon 'ships. I believe this might be one of the reasons why E/C keep getting brought up in so many non-'ship-related discussions on the general CSIM board -- like this topic -- regardless of whether or not they're really directly relevant to the subject matter.
In this regard, I really wish everyone could say what they mean and mean what they say, so we could have an open, honest, and hopefully, respectful, dialog here on the message board. I could totally respect an anti-E/C-shipper who steps up to the plate and says, "You know what, I'm sorry Eddie's leaving and Adam is coming back because I'm a DuCaine/CarWash fan, and with Eric/Adam gone, my couple could have had a chance." I wouldn't personally agree with this opinion, but I would appreciate the poster being a straight-shooter.:thumbsup: However, claiming that you don't want romance on CSIM when you're an avid non-canon shipper rings a bit hollow to me. Just my opinion. Of course, MY OBSERVATIONS DO NOT APPLY TO EVERYONE WHO'S AN ANTI-E/C-SHIPPER, OR WHO HAS RAISED E/C IN THIS AND OTHER THREADS. There are some folks who have bona fide issues with the way the E/C romance has been written (and who would have the same complaints if another 'ship were written the same way); who don't believe in any 'ships at all on crime dramas; and/or who genuinely welcomed Eddie's addition to the show in his own right. Naturally, this post does not address those people.
It's just that I've found that discussions get sort of muddled -- and fan-wars and mistrust among fans abound -- when unstated, ulterior motives become the "1,000-pound Gorilla in the Living Room."
P.S.: This post is in no way meant to knock Eddie, since I've always been, and remain, neutral about him and his CSIM character, Jesse. I wish Eddie the best of luck in his future endeavors.