She turned down a pay rise in 2004 and is still in the show, she did it to ensure that George Eades returned. If it was about the money she would of walked or held out. The events of 2004 have given tabloids lots to things to speculate about and they have been shown again and again to be untrue.
I pay attention to her words not the reporters opinon on what they think she meant.
Pay rises are part of the business, it maybe alot of money but the higher the pay the higher you position is the business. She has not asked for more then she was entitled too. If she turned down a pay rise to secure her job, then she should be expected to have a rise when her contract is up, they have been paying her less then her worth since 2004. If they offered a lower pay rise that is insulting and it does not make her greedy.However a low offer is disrespectful. Jorja is not greedy and it is
massive attack on her character and integrity for the rag media to keep repeating in columns filled with further untruths.
I would not be surprise that if Jorja is going it is to set up the end of CSI because the cast are unhappy with CBS, they always work as a team.
I pay attention to her words not the reporters opinon on what they think she meant.
Pay rises are part of the business, it maybe alot of money but the higher the pay the higher you position is the business. She has not asked for more then she was entitled too. If she turned down a pay rise to secure her job, then she should be expected to have a rise when her contract is up, they have been paying her less then her worth since 2004. If they offered a lower pay rise that is insulting and it does not make her greedy.However a low offer is disrespectful. Jorja is not greedy and it is
massive attack on her character and integrity for the rag media to keep repeating in columns filled with further untruths.
I would not be surprise that if Jorja is going it is to set up the end of CSI because the cast are unhappy with CBS, they always work as a team.