Season 7 Spoiler Discussion - Welcome back to the Big Apple!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bowling. All bowling in teh BHC :p. And all covered by teh NY Tardis TimeWarp.

Not rly surprised by that atall. Somewhat meh easy-come/easy-go eyerolling and disappointed :lol: but not surprised. Also nice to know teh show has priorities.

Looks like teh Couch and possibly !Tension wins, at least for now :p. Well. And Louie too, for that matter :lol:.

Thanks perlnoir
 
Last edited:
Wait. Does this mean I can never post my ~masterpiece again?

twilight-saga-new-york.png


Brb, crying in a corner.
sic.gif
 
^ :lol: That picture never fails to make me laugh! :guffaw:

Dear NY, please don't abandon the Twilight storyline. At least one Twilight episode next season is fine with me. Please. I liked how you handled it. And it's kind of impossible Aubrey will just disappear in thin air after deciding she would stay in Manhattan because of Mac's kindness. Thank you.
 
So what would Melina leaving have to do with it? They didnt need her if they wanted to proceed... unless to irritate the SMACKIES which they managed to succeed and drive away anyway!:lol:
 
Dear NY. I agree wif Geeno. Even though all things with the word Twilight in them have induced an involuntary pavlovian twitch to surface. If ever revisited, plz to f*cking promote it in some other manner :lol:.

So what would Melina leaving have to do with it? They didnt need her if they wanted to proceed... unless to irritate the SMACKIES which they managed to succeed and drive away anyway!:lol:
...perchance teh fact that MK left has the show's first priorities focused on dealing with addressing Stella's departure and creating and integrating a new leading character and related stories helping to establish Jo in NY :p:lol:? At some point, they may still devote some time to it. Or perhaps you'll be spared further irritation; Or mebbe you'll be irritated by Tension instead. Ya never know ;).

Wait. Does this mean I can never post my ~masterpiece again?

Brb, crying in a corner.

sic.gif
...n0OO0oo0oOo0ooo! Plz to not refrain from posting said Masterpiece again? We likes it. :D.

Aw. I'll try to cheer ya up a wee bit. *ahem* ...wait for it...





..."Bobby!"

:p
 
Will Claire Forlani or Madchen Amick be back on ‘CSI: NY‘ as Mac Taylor’s potential love interest? – Cassie
During my recent visit to the ‘CSI: NY’ set, when I asked Gary Sinise about Mac’s “journey” this season – given that they threw love interests old and new at him last spring – he answered that prior to the Melina Kanakaredes/Sela Ward swap, “We had some things planned, but now things have changed. We have new priorities.” Make of that what you will.

source: http://www.fancast.com/blogs/2010/t...oop-on-house-bones-housewives-chuck-and-more/

The BHC strikes again. I'm sorry, but that's a lame excuse to completely drop the whole story line.

If they drop it just because they have to explain Stella's departure and integrate Jo then that's lame. Those two things shouldn't halt development of the other characters.

If they drop it because they want to explore the idea of Jo and Mac then . . . the jury's still out. I'm not completely against the idea of Jo/Mac because they don't have the history that Mac/Stella had and if they have good chemistry it could be fun to see them evolve into a romantic pair. But I'm not completely for it because it would be hooking up the two leads and it would be another romantic pairing between core characters and those are two things I'm not fond of at all.
 
...perchance teh fact that MK left has the show's first priorities focused on dealing with addressing Stella's departure
I was under the impression from Carmine that was not going to require much "screen time"

perhaps you'll be spared further irritation; Or mebbe you'll be irritated by Tension instead. Ya never know ;).
I'm not one for self inflicted pain...there is always the "off" button!:lol:

I'm not completely against the idea of Jo/Mac because they don't have the history that Mac/Stella had and if they have good chemistry it could be fun to see them evolve into a romantic pair. But I'm not completely for it because it would be hooking up the two leads and it would be another romantic pairing between core characters
I think since it was so frowned upon where Mac and Stella were concerned it would not be a good idea. With D/L already and the ongoing promise for Hawkes the show would lose its focus as a crime show and would turn into the dating game instead. Besides all you would have left is Flack and Adam and I dont know if they are so good for each other.:):p
 
Besides all you would have left is Flack and Adam and I dont know if they are so good for each other.:):p
Well, I think Adam and Hawkes are ~meant to be~, but Adam and Flack would work too. :devil:
 
I think since it was so frowned upon where Mac and Stella were concerned it would not be a good idea.


If they had hooked up Mac/Stella then I would be totally against Mac/Jo because they'd be hooking Mac up with every leading lady on the show. But IMO, the fact that they didn't go there with Mac/Stella means the door is partially open to go there with Jo/Mac.
 
If they had hooked up Mac/Stella then I would be totally against Mac/Jo because they'd be hooking Mac up with every leading lady on the show. But IMO, the fact that they didn't go there with Mac/Stella means the door is partially open to go there with Jo/Mac.
Since SW will only be the second leading lady it was always frowned upon from what I understood that different people did not want M/S hooked up precisely because she was his leading lady and thought the hook up would interfere with friendship/working relationship would it not then do the same with SW since she would be holding the same position as Stella did or is it just personal preference?

i'm just gonna agree with perfect anomaly and elwood

Your too easy!:lol:
 
If they had hooked up Mac/Stella then I would be totally against Mac/Jo because they'd be hooking Mac up with every leading lady on the show. But IMO, the fact that they didn't go there with Mac/Stella means the door is partially open to go there with Jo/Mac.
Since SW will only be the second leading lady it was always frowned upon from what I understood that different people did not want M/S hooked up precisely because she was his leading lady and thought the hook up would interfere with friendship/working relationship would it not then do the same with SW since she would be holding the same position as Stella did or is it just personal preference?

I think there's more to it than just the two leads hooking up. That's definitely part of why I didn't want Mac/Stella hooked up, but the biggest reason for me not wanting them hooked up was their relationship as co-workers and good friends was a great dynamic and I didn't want that messed with. With Jo there isn't that history to be messed with so hooking up the two leads wouldn't be as bad to me as hooking up Mac and Stella.
 
I think there's more to it than just the two leads hooking up. That's definitely part of why I didn't want Mac/Stella hooked up, but the biggest reason for me not wanting them hooked up was their relationship as co-workers and good friends was a great dynamic and I didn't want that messed with.
Again personal preferance I think because some, my self included felt that friendship and great dynamic could have led to and would have been a wonderful romance, if written well that is. But it might have been a negative distraction for those who did not care for the pairing as D/L has become to some and has seemed to ruin the individuality of both.

With Jo there isn't that history to be messed with so hooking up the two leads wouldn't be as bad to me as hooking up Mac and Stella
And I'm sure there will be those who will not find Mac and Jo agreeable either. Excluding you, Elwood, Lisasimpson, and SW of course.:)
 
I think there's more to it than just the two leads hooking up. That's definitely part of why I didn't want Mac/Stella hooked up, but the biggest reason for me not wanting them hooked up was their relationship as co-workers and good friends was a great dynamic and I didn't want that messed with.
Again personal preferance I think because some, my self included felt that friendship and great dynamic could have led to and would have been a wonderful romance, if written well that is. But it might have been a negative distraction for those who did not care for the pairing as D/L has become to some and has seemed to ruin the individuality of both.

With Jo there isn't that history to be messed with so hooking up the two leads wouldn't be as bad to me as hooking up Mac and Stella
And I'm sure there will be those who will not find Mac and Jo agreeable either. Excluding you, Elwood, Lisasimpson, and SW of course.:)

Everything is personal preference. I don't think anyone can make blanket statements about what fans will or won't like. I'm not trying to speak for anyone other than myself. Personally the two leads hooking up isn't the main reason I was opposed to Mac/Stella, and while I don't necessarily want Jo/Mac together them being the two leads isn't enough for me to oppose it completely.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top