Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
stokeluver said:
i dont think i really like how greg has been maturing... he was so hot when he was hyper all the time! now he's almost boaring... but still cute. And your right, they need to put greg, warrick and sara and a little bit more cath. in more episodes. I mean nick got buried under ground, his car got stolen, and girlfriend was killed in episode 'boom' AWW! poor baby! I sooooo do hope that next season will be better!
GumDrops said:More of Warrick? Yes please! Less Tina/Warrick arguments (get divorced already, if you hate eachother that much!), less Warrick moodiness, and more of the early Warrick. Minus the gambling.
Crysthala said:
To me, WTG wasn't just the random GSR scene, which seems to be the main reason everyone's freaking out. If people paid attention, it wasn't entirely random.
You all were expecting too much of a "boom," like Grave Danger.
Bolero said:My main issue with WtG was that it *was* hyped up and in the end delivered practically nothing. For weeks the audience was shown promos stating that the episode would change the lives of the characters,
Jasmine said:
In my opinion i think that Grissom, Sara and Brass' live did changed. Grissom and Sara obviously by finally being together their lives changed and im really surprise that some audiences didn't get a hint from the diner picture that it was going to happen.
1. Yes, it was hyped up. And it delivered for me. But just because Brass wasn't in every damn second of the episode does not mean he has been reduced to subplot subbasement status. Yes, Brass is important, but I know I would have been royally pissed if the Scooby Gang did nothing but sit by his side and cry for the whole episode. I'm fairly certain most of us would be.Bolero said:
My main issue with WtG was that it *was* hyped up and in the end delivered practically nothing. For weeks the audience was shown promos stating that the episode would change the lives of the characters, that it would be an unforgettable hour of TV, CBS set up that diner picture prompting a frenzy, etc. And what happened? Brass's storyline was basically given a B story status, where we learned his daughter still has it in for him and his co-workers care for him, sort of. All of which will be promptly forgetten by Season 7.
Honestly, why hype up something involving a major beloved character and then not deliver? Way to go to piss off your audience CBS! CSI should have stuck to a low key ending, like previous seasons.
And the Warrick/Tina set up in Bang Bang that led nowhere? Why? Why bother shoving that in if there's no payoff for the audience?
...Season 7 should be interesting to say the least.
Yes, it was reduced to subplotbasement. That's cause neither of the cases involved his shooting. I think it would've worked better if they twisted the plot so as to have the CSIs investigate something directly related to it. And we have other characters joking around while he is in ICU. In the NY finale, we had several sincere moments of the characters remembering about their FRIEND in the ICU.Crysthala said:
1. Yes, it was hyped up. And it delivered for me. But just because Brass wasn't in every damn second of the episode does not mean he has been reduced to subplot subbasement status. Yes, Brass is important, but I know I would have been royally pissed if the Scooby Gang did nothing but sit by his side and cry for the whole episode. I'm fairly certain most of us would be.
2. Why must we be so impatient? "That led nowhere"? Maybe not at that very instant, but the "payoff for the audience" will likely come in S7. Keep in mind that this was the SEASON FINALE. And they did say it was going to be a cliffhanger episode, so all they had to do was leave some ends untied and here we are.