New World Order: Conspiracy Theory ( & A Whole Lot More)

I'll buy that, but what reasons could they possibly have for having "the ability to prevent certain things from happening and they choose not to..."? When you say it's the civilians that pay for everyone's "mistakes" aren't you in fact then saying that they were just that- mistakes?

I'm not trying to make life hard for you, I'm really not. I really would like to hear your opinions on this. :)
 
Money. if you refuse to believe that the NWO is more than a mere theory, it wouldn't be impossible to understand that it can be for money. And you have to remember that Bush for example needed a reason to attack Iraq, and without 9/11 he wouldn't have had much of an excuse. (the strange part here, that some of you may notice or want to comment on is that if he was really all pure evil he wouldn't care about having an excuse he would attack them right away and no one would be able to stop him anyway). That's the thign, its not just about "killing the enemy" and it isn't only about starting wars with other nations, because let's face it, Americans have never really tasted the pain of any of the wars America has gone into, or supported - since it never happens on American land. But if you're looking at it from the NWO perspective, this was a way to get rid of 3000 Americans too, PLUS instill the rest of America with this immense fear that there's MUCH more to come if they do not start supporting their president in this war. (Bush said himself in a press conference once that he is a "war president" that he makes choices in the office "with war on my mind".
About the "mistakes", I was supposed to put "mistakes" in quotation marks but did not do that, I will go back and fix it now because I do not believe these are mere mistakes, the evidence says much more than that. My apologies for the error, it will be fixed immediately.

Keep them coming, you're not making life hard for me I enjoy these conversations. :) And I like to think I can always find some way to support the thigns I say on this thread.
 
In a way I can understand why the Government didn't say anything about intel about the 9/11 attacks. Terrorist actions have the goal of causing world wide panick. If they would have started saying "We MIGHT be attacked in the near future" people would go crazy and start doing weird things. I think they just wanted to avoid mass panic.

May I ask where you read about this theory? I'm quite interested and would like to read into it a little before joining the discussion.
 
Seems to me he still needed an excuse- the WMO's. Sorry, but that part of the theory just doesn't hold water for me logistically. And I'm actually not opposed to the theories that the buildings actually came down a little too easily after the planes hit them- there's an interesting documentary on those theories, but sadly the name escapes me right now. It's all supposition and very little fact. Greed is bad and men do evil things; it's easy enough to say that because we've obviously seen enough of it in the past. I guess I'm just not seeing anything that backs the theory up for me. Thanks to years of CSI-watching, I've developed a serious need for hardcore, legitimate evidence before I can believe things.

And again, as much as I actually despise the man, the look on Bush's face while he was at that school, reading with the little kids... the look on his face was not the look of someone who had been expecting the news he was given. I just didn't see that.
 
BabaOReilly said:
And again, as much as I actually despise the man, the look on Bush's face while he was at that school, reading with the little kids... the look on his face was not the look of someone who had been expecting the news he was given. I just didn't see that.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he actually did look concerned and shocked.
I've seen a lot of documentaries about the twin towers falling. One actually suggested that there was an explosion in one of the towers that had nothing to do with the plane but did make the tower collapse. All those documentaries are very much anti-bush though and even though I'm not the man's best friend I don't think Bush'd kill his own people and make the Twin Towers collapse. I mean what would be the reason?
 
Sorry, Sara... I forgot to mention that if you start the topic from the beginning, you'll see all the theories you were asking about. Roka was very thorough and put a lot of interesting info at the beginning of the thread.

:)
 
Oh I'm not saying they should have spread the news about it, just internally done what they can to stop it.Through diplomatic discussions and through agreements with other governments (hate that idea, but something good may have come out of it, if the other governments were not as corrupt as this one) that could have helped prevent the 9/11 attacks. Okay, so it might not have been the best idea to tell everyone beforehand and cause all that panic in the States, but I'm guessing people would have much rather panicked than had such an attack happen on their grounds.

I first heard about it from a teacher some 3 years ago and have since then searched for research online and through books. If you've heard of Dr. Len Horowitz, his website is also a bit helpful in learning about the various ways that the NWO works through science to limit world population. Alex Jones site is also very helpful - and yes these are trusted sources. ( I'm trying to get in contact with desert_researcher, she's got incredible sources to share and was always keen on exposing the NWO for what it really is. ) Here are some helpful (and trusted) sites. :

1. Tetrahedron
2. Dr. Len Horowitz
3. InfoWars
4. Prison Planet
 
Just for reference, what constitute a "trusted" source?

And I agree with you, if they'd had advanced info and didn't do all they could to prepare for the eventuality of an attack, then that's beyond[/b] a mistake. I don't think spreading the panic to the country would have helped matters at all; I would prefer they just get things done and make sure there's nothing left to panic about.
 
Whoa slow down a sec, he looked concerned? For almost 10 minutes he sat there and continued reading "my pet goat"! One of his assistants actually told him the nation is under attack several times and he just continued to read. Now I understand some of you would say, he didn't want to scare the kids, but I'm sure the kids wouldn't have died if he told them he had an important meeting to attend to and would return another day to finish reading about goats.
The documentary abotu the explosion, I can give you the link to one of them online, for those that want to know more about it. They have come up with evidence, to prove that the buildings were loaded with explosives because in the history of burning buildings, only 3 have collapsed due to a "fire". Those 3 buildings were the ones that fell on 9/11 (the Twin Towers and a building close by that contained important documents, strangely enough - some of those documents had a link to the Saudis). Hopefully I'll have those sites for you within the next 2 days, I need to contact desert and ask for them since I no longer have them.
 
No Baba. We´re not the mistakes. We´re the ones politicans can blame. They risk to fail, because if they fail that´s what they have us for. They still have us. :devil:
 
A trusted source is someone that has researched the subject for years and can support it with evidence, and as in the case of Dr. Len Horowitz uses their education to support their "theories" .

I must say though that some of you may not like Horowitz becuase he tends to be a bit "too much" sometimes. He either blends religion into this a bit too much, or likes to repeat the same thing over and over again. But he's doing his best to get the word out and for that I respect him. Its just that some people do not agree with his religious views and he tends to abuse the priviledge of having some people that do agree with it. ( I have a feeling that last sentence made no sense... going kinda blank here so i hope you all got my point.)
 
Roka4csi said:
Whoa slow down a sec, he looked concerned? For almost 10 minutes he sat there and continued reading "my pet goat"! One of his assistants actually told him the nation is under attack several times and he just continued to read. Now I understand some of you would say, he didn't want to scare the kids...
Click to expand...

Actually, what I was thinking was this: Here is this man, supposedly the leader of the free world, and he clearly doesn't have a freakin' clue as to what to do with the information he's just been told. He looks shellshocked. He has no idea what to do.

And quite frankly that concerned me more than anything else you've suggested. This man was put in power to lead and he obviously didn't have the vaguest idea how to proceesd. He didn't instill much confidence in me, that's for sure.

And thanks for answering my question about your sources. That's interesting.
 
The man should not be a leader, its a shame to watch him pretend he knows what he's talking about. The more "freedom" speeches he makes, the more I realize that freedom does not exist. (boy oh boy, we better not open that subject up now, it would never end). The crappy part? No one does anythign about it. You've got an ignorant war-minded criminal running the White House and people still refer to him as "Mr. President". He runs the country by selling people his lies, and then adding that he "believes" or "feels" that his decisions are for the best of the nation. He's a bit too emotional dont you think.
 
sorry to interrupt, i just thought some of the anti-bush people (myself included) might like to read this article i saw it on television last night and thought it was pretty funny.
now im just going to sneak out, this thread is way too political for my mind :lol:
 
:lol: Thank you allmaple! I heard about that on Good Morning America, I was damn impressed (t was funny when one of the anchors said that alot of Americans were upset about that... i sure as hell wasnt :lol:) Much appreciated, would be nice if you joined us for the less political stuff :lol:

Oh and I think it would be okay to add this here too.. there have been Bible/Quranic/Nostradamus prophecies abotu the 7th year of the Millenium leading to the death or attempted murder of some world leader... its funny that the movie happens around October of 2007. That is also when it is predicted that this comet will strike earth and ... okay thats a bit too religious. We'll stick to political stuff for now :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top