Tinkerbell
Head of the Swing Shift
I was having an interesting conversation this morning with someone about gun laws and such, who was saying, according to a radio debate in the UK this morning, that in Switzerland it is compulsory that you own a gun (something about the men being in the armed forces, once they leave, they have to keep the gun they have been issued with). I did hear this third hand, so the details may not be accurate, so feel free to correct me.
Anyway, apparently Switzerland has the one of the lowest gun crime rates. Which, according to the radio station, begged the question, is it really down to the guns being easily available? Is it not down to the individual who chooses what to do with a gun? Yes, a gun is a deadly weapon, but if someone put a gun down on a table in front of me or even if the gun laws changed here in the UK, it wouldn't be an incentive to pick it and go around shooting everyone with it.
In the UK it is virtually impossible to own a gun, in fact, our police officers aren't even allowed to carry guns, but it is still, apparently, easy to get hold of a gun if you know where to go. Personally I do believe that the gun laws do need to be changed in the US and in a lot of other countries, but you have to ask the question, even if the gun laws had been changed, would it have prevented this tragedy? If someone’s determined enough to go on a shooting spree, they will find a way do it regardless. However, I personally believe that with the gun laws as they are at the moment, it's made too easy for someone to do it.
When I heard this point of view, I just thought it was an interesting topic of conversation.
Anyway, apparently Switzerland has the one of the lowest gun crime rates. Which, according to the radio station, begged the question, is it really down to the guns being easily available? Is it not down to the individual who chooses what to do with a gun? Yes, a gun is a deadly weapon, but if someone put a gun down on a table in front of me or even if the gun laws changed here in the UK, it wouldn't be an incentive to pick it and go around shooting everyone with it.
In the UK it is virtually impossible to own a gun, in fact, our police officers aren't even allowed to carry guns, but it is still, apparently, easy to get hold of a gun if you know where to go. Personally I do believe that the gun laws do need to be changed in the US and in a lot of other countries, but you have to ask the question, even if the gun laws had been changed, would it have prevented this tragedy? If someone’s determined enough to go on a shooting spree, they will find a way do it regardless. However, I personally believe that with the gun laws as they are at the moment, it's made too easy for someone to do it.
When I heard this point of view, I just thought it was an interesting topic of conversation.