nattybatty55
Nadalaholic
Im with you on that one dutch!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CSI Files: Have you been given any hints about what might be next for Danny and Lindsay in the next season?
Giovinazzo:I did hear a little bit about there's going to maybe be some wayward Danny [behavior] this season.
CSI Files: Is there going to be another woman, or might there be a love triangle in the works?
Giovinazzo: I don't know if we've got to go so far as love--he does the things young men do.
CSI Files: Oh no! Is he going to cheat on Lindsay?
Giovinazzo: Well, you never know. I think that's a possibility, that maybe she wasn't all Danny thought she'd be. Maybe he's already looking elsewhere.
Exactly! They didn't want him to be an afterthought--so it seems like they forgot him altogether! (Aside from those two name mentions with relation to Shane Casey, of course.) An off-hand mention of him (that actually gave us information about his condition) would have been better than the big fat nothing we got.PerfectAnomaly said:
And Louie is alive! I understand not wanting to bring him up as an afterthought or an aside, but there were a few S3 episodes where mentioning Louie would have fit seamlessly into the plot of the show.
You make a very good point. My problem is that yeah, everyone can't get development at the same time--but they should all get the same amount over time. In the course of a season, I'm sure there would be arcs and episodes where certain characters got more time devoted to them--but who those people are should change more, and it should be memorable stuff for everyone.I also enjoyed reading that he understands he's part of an ensemble cast and that Danny's development won't always be in the forefront
Yep, yep--but this should be a process, not something that just *poof!* happened. The way he used to clash with Mac was interesting, and even if their characters are moving past that, it's something that should be used as development for both of them--getting laid isn't the only way to build interest, writers! Relationships are powerful stuff, yes, but the non-romantic relationships are just as powerful as the romantic ones, and far less divisive, if you ask me.It makes me happy to see that Mr. G wants to see some of Danny's fire back; even though he knows the character needs to mature and grow.
Word.I've seen some D/L fans who took what happened in the finale as some kind of validation that the characters are soul mates who are destined for eternal true love. The only thing validated was that they were attracted to each other, got drunk and f*cked on Danny's pool table.
Very true. Also, it's quite possible that, even if they're dating, they break up. It happens in real life, after all, so it might just be possible on tv as well. [/sarcasm]In light of that, I don't see how Danny hooking up with someone else can be thought of as "cheating" on Lindsay.
Faylinn said:
Exactly! They didn't want him to be an afterthought--so it seems like they forgot him altogether! (Aside from those two name mentions with relation to Shane Casey, of course.) An off-hand mention of him (that actually gave us information about his condition) would have been better than the big fat nothing we got.PerfectAnomaly said:
And Louie is alive! I understand not wanting to bring him up as an afterthought or an aside, but there were a few S3 episodes where mentioning Louie would have fit seamlessly into the plot of the show.
You make a very good point. My problem is that yeah, everyone can't get development at the same time--but they should all get the same amount over time. In the course of a season, I'm sure there would be arcs and episodes where certain characters got more time devoted to them--but who those people are should change more, and it should be memorable stuff for everyone.I also enjoyed reading that he understands he's part of an ensemble cast and that Danny's development won't always be in the forefront
Yep, yep--but this should be a process, not something that just *poof!* happened. The way he used to clash with Mac was interesting, and even if their characters are moving past that, it's something that should be used as development for both of them--getting laid isn't the only way to build interest, writers! Relationships are powerful stuff, yes, but the non-romantic relationships are just as powerful as the romantic ones, and far less divisive, if you ask me.It makes me happy to see that Mr. G wants to see some of Danny's fire back; even though he knows the character needs to mature and grow.
I've seen some D/L fans who took what happened in the finale as some kind of validation that the characters are soul mates who are destined for eternal true love. The only thing validated was that they were attracted to each other, got drunk and f*cked on Danny's pool table.
Word.
I found this comment interesting: "I don't know if we've got to go so far as love--he does the things young men do."
He was talking about a love triangle, but I can't help but wonder if there was more to it--these interviews are just part of the whole conversation. It makes me wonder if maybe he doesn't see the relationship between Danny and Lindsay as having gone to the 'love' level yet either. It only just went to the 'relationship' level in the finale, after all. And call me skeptical, but I don't think sex=love.
In light of that, I don't see how Danny hooking up with someone else can be thought of as "cheating" on Lindsay.
Very true. Also, it's quite possible that, even if they're dating, they break up. It happens in real life, after all, so it might just be possible on tv as well. [/sarcasm]