I don't have anything against viewers not liking the new detective, or thinking that she's a photocopy of Aiden (although I disagree on both points, personally
), but I really don't understand how anyone thinks she's taking time away from Flack.
She's a supplemental character who serves a distinct purpose--Flack can't do everything, after all. Sure, they might have her as the detective on the A-case while Flack is on the B-case on occassion (assuming that she sticks around, of course), but every character can't get the same amount of screentime in every episode...
I think a lot of people were disappointed with the premiere because, well, they were really anticipating it. Personally, my excitement enhanced the episode when I watched it, and overall I still think it was a good episode.
But I'm curious if season premieres
ever really live up to expectation?
Another thing that kind of confuses me--if it's not acceptable for a season premiere, why would it be acceptable in the middle of the season, where some people have suggested this episode would fit?
Shouldn't they
all be equally as interesting?
I of course agree with the general consensus that Flack's injuries were sort of blown off. My thing is, if they weren't planning on making it a big deal this season, why did they make the wounds so severe in the finale? They could have had him gravely injured without having all of his innards on display--the way that it was portrayed in the season 2 finale really demanded a more long-term commitment to the recovery. And they should have known that to begin with. They also should have known that we'd wonder about just how much time has passed since the finale. Is it real time, with about 4 months having gone by, or was it a longer period of time? I think the writers often expect us to make too many assumptions. They are professional writers, they shouldn't expect us to do the thinking for them.
That brings me to something that sort of bothered me a bit: the clunky lines. The way that Stella mentioned Peyton leaving Columbia to work in the Morgue was sort of...expository. It sounded awkward to me, not like something Stella would actually say to her. It's like I can see the notes for Peyton's character, and the writers just cut-and-pasted them into the dialogue rather than smoothing it out a bit. Then again, that's just me.
That's not the only such line, in this episode or others, but it's the one that sort of sticks out at me at the moment. These are professional writers (listen to me repeating myself
), I should expect them to do a better job of writing dialogue than the average fan.
That also holds true for the plot holes as well. I don't know how much editing has to do with it, but how long have these writers been working in tv?
Let me also add to the sentiment about the stories being generally about the rich members of NY society, dying in really strange ways. It's not always about the most sensational type of crime--if it's a good show, with a good solid cast and excellent writing, one average person shooting another average person will still work. I think the show writers (for all three shows) are getting caught up in the competition to find the craziest way to kill people, and that's not necessarily good for the show. Concentrate on making everything mesh and we don't need weird cases to hold our attention.
Re: the opening credits. I'm thinking that they probably
are planning to do new credits, but they probably want to wait until certain episodes have aired first. Not sure why, but maybe they just don't want to reveal the footage yet. *shrug* They really
need to do a new theme video, if only because the characters look different. Let's cross our fingers that they'll unveil a new set of opening credits within the next few episodes.