Really good Crumbs, incredibly emotional and I'm loving the continued references to older cases from the show; it's giving things, especially the characters, a little extra depth. However there is one bit that is confusing me: 'A sudden realisation hit her that many of the children listed had been missing six years, which meant she could have to check back to missing babies back from two thousand and four in order to get a hit.' Now it's clear that no reference to the child's age has been made but I was under the impression (going by the repeated use of the words 'Baby Doe' and Robbins saying she's an infant) that she's supposed to be 3-5 years old. This would mean that she was born no earlier than 2006. My point is that surely Sara should have been able to eliminate any matches on her list that were over 4 1/2 years old and reduce the potential matches; rather than adding more going back to 2004, which would make the child at least 8 years old (certainly not an infant as Robbins called her). Just wondering if you could let us know what sort of age she's really supposed to be.