Also interesting is that PL mentioned someone was 'targeted.' It could be simply in the course of the crime in progress, or mebbe it does actually mean there was a deliberate and specific target in one of the team. It would be more interesting if it were a deliberate targeting, but given it happens in the first ten minutes it kinda sounds like it could be someone getting caught in the middle of things.I just noticed this in the spoilers, and I have to say that the way that's worded, it's probably Lindsay... "kidnappers-turned-cop killers" means, to me, that they were kidnappers, but in the process of trying to kidnap someone, ended up killing a cop. Lindsay is a detective... I mean, it is entirely possible that it could end up being Danny (lord, could you imagine?), but Lindsay is still the biggest choice for me.a team of sophisticated kidnappers-turned-cop killers
It would be temporary, but I think tying the aftermath into a cliffhanger would lead to the first handful of eps in S6 to have a generic curiousity factor, regardless of how avidly or casually one follows the show.I think this has more to do with an actor wanting to leave the show, and less to do with the writers/PTB wanting to kill someone off for a ratings boost, which would be temporary at best. But when an actor wants to leave, TPTB often take fullest advantage of it by killing them off, i.e. Rory Cochrane on Miami, Gary Dourdan on Vegas CSI, Sasha Alexander on NCIS, etc.
I tend to agree that this is not a top down imposition, but a contract running to a close or an actor moving on.I think someone wants out to pursue other interests, whether it's Anna and her children/home life, Hill and his many other public pursuits, Emmanuelle and her other offers floating in (and I suspect she always meant this to be a temp stint anyway, although I adore her character and would love to see her make a permanent go of it). I honestly don't think this is TPTB "trimming the fat" off the budget by killing off a cast member, I think someone has come to the end of their contract, and has opted not to renew. (Of course I could be very wrong, as sometimes is the case :lol. Just my Spidey Sense on the subject.
As for Emmanuelle, I thought I saw within the last month or two a clip on ET with her behind the scenes on set, wherein she expressed her delight at being a part of the show no matter how big or small the involvement, and essentially said she'd be happy to be on it for as long as they'd have her...
That point about Hawkes is a very good one in my mind. Sadly.In terms of characters, Hawkes, and Angell are the ones in the most danger at the moment. Hawkes has seen the info on the flash drive, and Angell is involved with the Greek storyline which could easily have negative consequences. Either one of them could be easily killed off in this sense-there is already a good set up for them to go out.
As far as Angell, I for some reason just don't have the feeling she's gonna be the one to go. Again, a guest actor, not a part of the main cast, and the Greek storyline is said to be wrapped up prior. Well, I hope that might be true anyways, as I like her, and thing she adds to the show when she's a part of it.
I don't want it to be Hawkes or Angell. *sigh*
And yep, there's just too little info, and you know we're only gonna be carefully doled out wee little tidbits to keep us talking and interested.
Bastards. :lol:
A contract can be renegotiated, if both parties agree. A contract can have clauses and options, ie. four years with an option to renew or extend, or an option to renegotiate within a certain framework at a point within it, etc. It can have riders added to it. There's also the agreements between the unions and the studios too though. I get the impression trying to 'get out' of anything in mid-contract, where one party wanted to and the other didn't, would be more of a hassle than is worth, if that's an issue at all. I think it must be more in the vein of an end of, non-renewal, or mutual agreement.Does signing a contract really mean that the actors/sutdio can't get out? I mean, with good attorneys, and both sides being in agreement, I would imagine that anyone could get out of a contract.
But who knows.
As far as how it affects the show, I'm still thinking Lindsay or Hawkes. But the more points people put forward, the harder it is to really feel confident in a prediction like that. :lol:
Last edited: