GrissomFREAK
CSI Level Two
^^ Thanks girls
I was supposed to use one of the theories that we had studied in class -narrative theory, reader oriented criticism, audience ethnography criticism, semiotic criticism, rhetorical criticism, genre criticism.
You know, at first sight, this class seems easy, you think you're going to watch TV all the time. Well, not really.
Anyway, I used narrative criticism -supposedly the hardest to work with, adopting a traditional narative but dominantly visualist approach -looking at the storylines, dialogues, facial expressions, camera angles, shot depth, light/dark contrasts ... and interpreting what I was seeing.
Basically what narrative theory aims to do is re-tell the story, you can use metaphors and stuff like that, as long as you can back it up with elements from the TV text (the episode).
The title of my paper was
"CSI: ANATOMY OF AN EPISODE - Crime scene investigation under the microscope - A traditional narrative and visualist approach to television criticism"
Here's part of my introduction:
And that was my conclusion:
The cool thing is I got to watch Butterflied over and over again It wasn't easy but I loved writing that paper.
I was supposed to use one of the theories that we had studied in class -narrative theory, reader oriented criticism, audience ethnography criticism, semiotic criticism, rhetorical criticism, genre criticism.
You know, at first sight, this class seems easy, you think you're going to watch TV all the time. Well, not really.
Anyway, I used narrative criticism -supposedly the hardest to work with, adopting a traditional narative but dominantly visualist approach -looking at the storylines, dialogues, facial expressions, camera angles, shot depth, light/dark contrasts ... and interpreting what I was seeing.
Basically what narrative theory aims to do is re-tell the story, you can use metaphors and stuff like that, as long as you can back it up with elements from the TV text (the episode).
The title of my paper was
"CSI: ANATOMY OF AN EPISODE - Crime scene investigation under the microscope - A traditional narrative and visualist approach to television criticism"
Here's part of my introduction:
The narrative of this episode, which is incidentally called "Butterflied" (literally 'cut open and spread apart' as in a butterfly incision), revolves around the encompassing idea of dissection (both metaphorical and literal) and of anatomy, in an effort to present "gritty, realistic stories about humans and their societies" (Gronbeck, 2004, p.19), notably by focusing on details, whether it be about the crime (however gruesome), the art of investigating crime scenes, or the investigators themselves. First it is the anatomy of a murder/crime scene Finding the 'what' by focusing on the ‘how’, using special effects, close ups and graphic details, proving science to be the tool of choice to solve crimes. It is also the anatomy/dissection of a profession: how it works and what it is about. Ultimately, it is Grissom himself who is being symbolically anatomized when the case has an unexpected impact on him, impact that is reflected visually.
And that was my conclusion:
Approaching “Butterflied” from a visualist perspective allows to better appreciate the trademark narrative technique used on “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation”. From colors to lighting, camera angles, setting or props, virtually every element on the show has a visual significance and role in the narrative, to one end only: realism about the world that the show seeks to represent, about the crimes that are committed, and about the job and the people working it. A more traditional narrative approach (notably by looking at the storylines) leads to one conclusion only, the ultimate reality that the show strives to convey: the CSI’s, these shadow workers, are the ones breaking the cases and solving the crimes, not the police (represented by Captain Jim Brass and seen only twice during the episode, at the opening and closing of the case), contrary to common -but erroneous- knowledge.
The cool thing is I got to watch Butterflied over and over again It wasn't easy but I loved writing that paper.