I liked the episode up until the ending.
I think they should have ended the episode with Sara taking the job as Lab Director, and Grissom getting
on to his boat a sailing off. It didn't make sense to me that after being divorced for so many years, that
they would go off together like that.
Hi, there. I am not an articulate person, but I'll try to answer your query a bit here.
As a CSI fan, I want closure. There's no deny about it. Of all the arcs CSI had, GSR got it while many others didn't. It was disappointing not to see Sofia Curtis. It was disappointing not to know if Brass would have Anne Kramer with him in his retirement. It was disappointing not to know what happened to 'Sqweegel'. But like what stated in my previous posting, Zuiker didn't have enough time to tie up ALL the loose ends. And he had a two-hour movie to make in order to bring an end to a series. Like it or not, GSR was an important subplot of the series from the get go. It was subtle, not flashy, and definitely not showy. Lots of people don't get it. Because they were hung up with the notion that only the leading woman should get the leading man. CSI dared to be different. Petersen made it very clear that he wanted Sara to be Grissom's love interest back then. He made it clear at the Paley Center event held on Sept.16th by telling Jorja - and the fans in large - that Grissom fell for Sara because Sara got Grissom.
Sara Got Grissom was the key to understand GSR. She let him be. We all know Grissom was a hard man to love. He was not perfect. But Sara loved him for what he was. Or I should say in spite of what he was. The same can be said about how Grissom looked Sara. We also know Sara was not perfect. But Grissom could understand and see Sara for what she was. And appreciated what he saw. Two socially inept, awkward science nerds had the good fortune meeting up and falling in love. It's unconventional. Both were unconventional characters.
You couldn't let go the 'divorce' part, so let's look at it here. Well, to put in a nutshell, the FMN scriptwriter mucked it up. After Petersen's departure, he steadily refused to do guest appearances while CSI folks asked Jorja to rejoin the cast in S10 and as one of the regulars in S11 . I don't think the writing crop they had then was equipped to handle a long-distance marriage, and the bigger problem was they had no idea about the GSR history. When Grissom fans kept on asking for his return, the best CSI could get out of Petersen was the ending scene in TWMG. But fans wanted more. (Can you blame them? After all, Grissom did promise his mother and Sara that he'd be back and take them to lunch when he returned.) So what did the show folks do? They came up with the idea to have Grissom cut Sara off, via phone! Personally I think it was unforgivable. The Grissom I know would never have done this to Sara. The writer, Andrew Dettamann, not only took knife to GSR but also demolished Grissom's character in the same breath.
Their love for each other was never the problem. So, dealing with what scriptwriter gave us, I think it's fair to say they were divorced because of their communication break-down, the physical distance, and their weird sense of wanting the best for each other so he did what he did because he 'thought' it's what she wanted. If you want to know how Sara looked at the love she shared with Grissom, just go back and re-watch the 'Girls Gone Wilder' episode in S15.
Petersen and Zuiker were two of the biggest GSR fans you can find anywhere. (Sorry to burst your bubble since it looks like your are a Catherine fan.) Now given the chance to bring the series to an end, both wanted to set GSR straight as the way it should be. Alas. It came back to the time constrain matter again. there was simply not enough time to spell out everything for the fans. A lot of scenes were left off screen and for the fans to fill in the blanks. I think that's why you would say it didn't make sense to you that after being divorced for so many years, that they would go off together like that.
Well, let's get technical here now. We have no choice but to deal with the hands the inept scriptwriter gave us. They were divorced in S13, so you can't really say it's been so many years since they were divorced. Don't forget the Executive Producer, Don McGill, after the airing of FMN, came out to tell the fans that they were not divorced, they were only taking a break. So, it's possible they were only divorced for a year. But it's neither here or there. (But consequently they made Sara tell Nick that Grissom was not her husband any more.) So, my deal CSI fellow fan, can you see what was the problem everybody having? How about lack of creativity? How about lazy writing? How about ignoring the character integrity? How about lack of knowledge about the character history? How about ignoring the character continuity?
Then we have to look at the series finale plotline. Here's another part of the problem we had, too. Why bringing Lady Heather back and made her the center of the finale? I don't think she should be brought back at all, let alone to have the whole case built around her. But, hey. Jerry Bruckheimer wanted her. So Zuiker had to have her included. Not sure if I am allowed to post a link here, but go ahead read it and it should give you a better idea how Zuiker went about writing the series finale: (
http://deadline.com/2015/09/csi-ser...ene-future-creator-anthony-zuiker-1201553754/) It was unfortunate that Lady Heather ate up so much screen time and lines, and everybody else was shortchanged. It would have been nice to let Grissom tell Sara to her face why he acted like an arse in FMN; a heart to heart talk would have cleared a lot of questions, right?
As for Sara walking away from the top post at the lab, actually I wasn't surprised at all. Here is the reason why: back in 2006 Jorja and Petersen did a joint interview with TV Guide, I believe the reporter asked Jorja if they were forced to choose their jobs or love, what would be Sara's choice. Jorja said Sara "....by virtue of being a realist, is also very much a romantic. So I think if she really was in love with someone, and it came down to a choice between work and love, I think she’d go in the direction of love.” That, my fellow CSI fan, is one fine example showing how a performer could and would read and understand the role she's assigned to play. (A fine example for character continuity, too. That's why I think what Dettamann did to Grissom was unforgivable.)
Don't you love Grissom's lonely whale song scene? Also, his little confession scene with Lady Heather should tell all of us his truly feeling about Sara. If he couldn't have her back, he'd rather be alone and lonely and 'miss her for the rest of my life' than with someone else. I both liked and disliked this scene. I liked it because Grissom came clean with his love for the only one he ever loved; I disliked this scene, because it's not fair to this Lady Heather character. I know Grissom shared a strong and solid friendship with her, just like the one he had with Catherine. But LH was a bit more than just a friend. I believe he had a one-night stand with her in LHB. Their encounter in LOAR was ambiguous. She did come off as if she were offering herself to him. I can't tell if she loved Grissom, or if she wanted Grissom. Either way, it's rather cruel and humiliating for her to sit there listening to Grissom confessing the love he had for another woman. Lady Heather shouldn't come back imho; but since she did come back, I think she deserved better treatment than this.