happyharper13
Pathologist
^I honestly have to disagree with a lot of what you guys are saying. While I really do completely understand how frustrating it is to see so little character drama and development for the main characters, it's a show that really is based around science. It was created as a procedural and that's how TPTB are probably gonna keep it, at least until its ratings drop significantly. Personally, I just think that the writers deserve a lot more credit than they're given. Creating storylines based so much on science is hard.
Furthermore, I strongly suspect that we have a skewed view of the show, just because we're the viewers who are more invested in the show, and, in particular, in its characters. I've always heard that about half of the viewers watch for the characters and about half watch it for the science. On Talk, I've always gotten the feeling that we only generally see the character-oriented viewers' perspectives. I think a lot of the more science-oriented viewers would have a very different take on the quality of writing on CSI.
Furthermore, I strongly suspect that we have a skewed view of the show, just because we're the viewers who are more invested in the show, and, in particular, in its characters. I've always heard that about half of the viewers watch for the characters and about half watch it for the science. On Talk, I've always gotten the feeling that we only generally see the character-oriented viewers' perspectives. I think a lot of the more science-oriented viewers would have a very different take on the quality of writing on CSI.