Re: Season 8 Spoiler Discussion - There's Nothing You Can't Do In New
Just when ya thought it was safe .
Starting and stopping with, "closer to the premiere date," would really have sufficed.
(I think my new fave DL thing may just have gone from "10%" to "they try to have lunch in episode two." )
-
PS. Dearest Woeful Sad Panda: Bring on 'else.' I want 'else.' Do it. Dooooo eeeeeet. Go ahead. All chips in. Fargo the Embargo. Double f*cking toucan dare ya. I can bet only the most uniquely insightful, piercing, and irresistable questions have been posed in this masterful DL expose alluded to. Surely the stakes are worth it? Bring on the cataclysm, set forth teh apocalypse by jumping the queue of revelation, scooping not just the show but yourselves wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiith... ...what they'll bloody well be having for supper . Kidding, but c'mon now, rly. The endeavor, access, and parameters are respected, and not the issue. Else as a general concept has a certain appeal, if only in hopes your subject matter might widen from DL to include Something of it from time to time. Cheers.
-
Just irritating that it's easy risk-free coasting and traffic amid the network et al controlling things rather stringently in marching to their own precisely orchestrated promotional drum.
I find it additionally irksome that the content of the prevalent ZOMG-style smartcarpetbombing of info is usually some wee item, saved and withheld for a long planned rainy day, daftly tarted up for the occasion . When it's further done with the benificent air of bestowing a rare and invaluable gift, well... :lol:
The obsession with streaming & micro-managing Exposure by all parties and meta commenting by some is understandable but also wryly exasperating, doesn't always seem productive, and certainly isn't always attractive or appealing. But it's still profitable, even if the beanies and barons don't really seem to know entirely what to do amid a shifting landscape. Meh & shrug. What the hell do I know. </peeve :lol:>
The questions may have been hoping to pry some new nugget forward every time, but the replies have been consistently circling and recycling variants of the same information for weeks.
...delightful.Another week, another edition of Watch With Kristin regurgitating the same Danny/Lindsay scoop...
Just when ya thought it was safe .
Impressive. Impressive just how much space the site devotes to talking about ...itself :lol:.Daniellegirli: Anything on the CSI:NY Danny and Lindsay interview from last month that we never saw/read?
You found us out. We were just hoarding all the Danny-Lindsay goodies for ourselves. Or, due to a little thing we journalists have to worry about called an embargo, we literally can't show you the interviews yet. Or else! And nobody wants "Or else," you know? Gotta wait until closer to the premiere date. I know it's hard, but you'll have to be patient until those interviews go live. It's really for your own good. Wouldn't want you to pass out from all the info we have on the episode that features the crime-fighting duo. Keep your eyes open, though: We'll start doling out scoop in small doses so you don't get the bends.
Starting and stopping with, "closer to the premiere date," would really have sufficed.
Lunch. A spoiler about lunch. ...'S rather sad to see that come to fruition, really :lol:. Lordy.KellGreen1: Anything on CSI: New York's Danny and Lindsay?
Anna Belknap tells us that there are some struggles early on getting used to Danny's (Carmine Giovinazzo) new sergeant position: "They are used to working together and seeing each other everyday, so it becomes sort of difficult. They try have lunch in episode two. They can't make it work. It's frustrating. You're used to seeing somebody everyday. He works long hours, she works long hours, they're not seeing each other, so it's tough." And yet again they miss a meal together. Sad panda.
(I think my new fave DL thing may just have gone from "10%" to "they try to have lunch in episode two." )
-
PS. Dearest Woeful Sad Panda: Bring on 'else.' I want 'else.' Do it. Dooooo eeeeeet. Go ahead. All chips in. Fargo the Embargo. Double f*cking toucan dare ya. I can bet only the most uniquely insightful, piercing, and irresistable questions have been posed in this masterful DL expose alluded to. Surely the stakes are worth it? Bring on the cataclysm, set forth teh apocalypse by jumping the queue of revelation, scooping not just the show but yourselves wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiith... ...what they'll bloody well be having for supper . Kidding, but c'mon now, rly. The endeavor, access, and parameters are respected, and not the issue. Else as a general concept has a certain appeal, if only in hopes your subject matter might widen from DL to include Something of it from time to time. Cheers.
Agree.They're catering to a segment of the fandom by repeating the same thing over and over again - it's not giving that segment of the fandom anything new, and it's not giving the rest of the fandom anything. It's just silly. I'm not saying they should never answer questions about DL, but variety is the spice of life. Seriously.
-
Just irritating that it's easy risk-free coasting and traffic amid the network et al controlling things rather stringently in marching to their own precisely orchestrated promotional drum.
I find it additionally irksome that the content of the prevalent ZOMG-style smartcarpetbombing of info is usually some wee item, saved and withheld for a long planned rainy day, daftly tarted up for the occasion . When it's further done with the benificent air of bestowing a rare and invaluable gift, well... :lol:
The obsession with streaming & micro-managing Exposure by all parties and meta commenting by some is understandable but also wryly exasperating, doesn't always seem productive, and certainly isn't always attractive or appealing. But it's still profitable, even if the beanies and barons don't really seem to know entirely what to do amid a shifting landscape. Meh & shrug. What the hell do I know. </peeve :lol:>
I'm mildly baffled but will certainly go along with YMMV here.Personally I haven't seen any recycled info. They have given a different answer to every D/L question they have answered as far as I can tell.
The questions may have been hoping to pry some new nugget forward every time, but the replies have been consistently circling and recycling variants of the same information for weeks.
Last edited: