100 G's an ep? That would make it, per episode, about commeasurate to a not-elite-but-superstar NBA player salary. (I think I worked it out to 8.2 million/season, which isn't Dirk Nowitzki territory, maybe Jason Terry... :lol: )
I had a friend who was a player on a pro baseball team. he explained to me that part of the reason professional athletes push for such high salaries is that after their playing career is done - that's it. I think he quoted me 4.3 years average for a MLB career...then you go back to selling cars, coaching high school athletics, whatever. In some cases, the player doesn't last that long in the big leagues. In other cases, they excel and have a long, lucrative career. (Ironically, my friend, though he only had a slightly-longer-than-average and not star-level playing career, is still head coach of a MLB team...30 years after this discussion!) At any rate, that's what I'm saying - they "make hay while the sun shines".
Granted, actors have a longer career potential since the profession isn't as grueling on their bodies and their abilities aren't as subject to decline with age. But in most cases, they, too, have to take advantage of the fat years, because those fat years can turn lean as they get older (unless you're a Bill Petersen, Anthony Hopkins, Sean Connery, etc.). Also, they have to deal with: Taxes (on THAT kind of salary?
), agent (what is their cut now, 15% still?), manager, publicist, in a lot of cases attorney's retainer fee, accountant, transportation, (as someone else correctly observed) exorbitant L.A. area rents/house notes (a modest 1-bedroom apartment in my very non-Beverly-Hillsesque neighborhood goes for close to a thousand a month) and cost of living...it adds up. (Ever watch the "Behind The Music" about TLC? That gives you a GREAT indication of it from the music end of the biz...)
But say someone's making a hundred large an episode, and everyone assumes they're living like Bill Gates. Mmmmmm...not so much.
Again, I don't put much credence in anything the New York Post writes - to me, they're maybe one rung up the journalistic food chain from Weekly World News. Now - before Destiny or one of the other mods collars me and reads me the riot act
, how this all fits in with the actual subject matter of this thread...
Have any of you (and I'm talking to a lot of you veteran TV-philes like me out there...) ever...EVER...seen so much information floating around about the specifics of how a show's season is going to end? Yeah, yeah, this is the "information age"...but this is also Hollywood, and those folks have lots of Net-savvy people on their staffs. I will be extremely surprised if more than one or two of the specifics of the season finale as currently in the rumor mill actually pan out. Maybe Jorja's leaving, maybe not. If so, maybe her character will be killed off, maybe not. I'm just real, real suspicious of the volume of spoiler material that's being leaked. Honestly, I think we're getting a nice, deluxe "red herring" salad to tide us over until the 17th. And SOMEBODY in the high rent offices at CBS/Alliance Atlantis is reading this and laughing their tailfeathers off.
Could the rumors be true? Sure - every once in a while even the National Enquirer gets it right. :lol: But anyone who cites the freakin' STAR as their source...what's next, Robert David Hall was raised by space aliens?
Just sayin'. Re-shoots may have been necessary for some reason - shooting more than one finale denouement's been done before. Jorja MAY have raised some doubts about the precise direction of the script. Again - wouldn't be the first time, by the first actor, not even on "CSI". Maybe she was unable to show up on a specific filming date for some reason. There are a couple of flus going around out here currently. Could have been a family emergency. Or the whole NYP article could be complete bu...fabrication.
Just sayin'. Don't flip out. Not yet, anyway. I believe the non-specific spoilers about the ep, but as far as exactly where it ends up, I'm thinking all bets are off...