Ooops, What a mistake!

Ok I was watching a few early episodes and noticed this...

CSINY100_jacket.jpg

CSINY108_jacket.jpg
 
That one is somewhat forgivable. The first picture is from CSI: MIAMI MIA/NYC Nonstop, right? It is forgivable given the fact that it was the episode to introduce NY. However, there are many unforgivable ones in the series itself and I can't catch them all (even though I am able to watch an episode more than 20 times).
 
Heh, that's pretty funny. Having the NY first makes more sense. The other one just looks like the show logo. :lol:
 
Hmm... I guess those are the little silly things that change between introduction episode and the actual episode (which annoy you later on)

But isn't the text usually just "CSU" in NY - I mean... including this show? (I know I saw that text a lot in NYPD Blue :p )
 
A fresh one... A mistake that is... In "DOA for a Day".
Mac hides behind a pile of bricks to protect himself from the bullets. One brick from the top gets three gun shot holes in it. When he rises to continue "Suspect X" pursuit the brick is brand new...:lol:
1.jpg

2.jpg
 
wow you guys are too good!! It's been a while since I watched the first three seasons. And if I'm honest, I'm too busy watching Danny's every move to notice mistakes - lol!!!
 
fo_poozle said:
in the closer,from s2, the victim thats dead in the parking garage's name is gilbert novotny. but when they are reviewing the evidence in the lab, danny calls him george novotny
Click to expand...

That was one of those glaring mistakes that made me laugh. :guffaw:It's from Season One though. That episode was The Closer. I remember that one because it's on the same DVD as On The Job.
 
Ticamo77 said:
fo_poozle said:
in the closer,from s2, the victim thats dead in the parking garage's name is gilbert novotny. but when they are reviewing the evidence in the lab, danny calls him george novotny
Click to expand...

That was one of those glaring mistakes that made me laugh. :guffaw:It's from Season One though. That episode was The Closer. I remember that one because it's on the same DVD as On The Job.
Click to expand...
crap i knew that ha, i don't know why i said s2, i'm sorry i'm an idiot lol
 
Hi there,

This has driven me insane for sooooo long. If I am wrong please correct me.... Lindsay was 14 when she survived her friends deaths. This was apparently 10 years ago. Is Lindsay Monroe only supposed to be 24????? WTF?????
 
flackfan_82 said:
omg these are hilarious...

there is one mistake from season two that always makes me cringe when I see it... in Grand Murder At Central Station, when Hawkes accompanies the vic in the ambulance to the hospital, and he is starting an IV and the tubing is empty :rolleyes: and they put the ET tube "down" the guys throat to bag him (I'm a nurse, sorry for the technical lingo - also why I noticed this right away, and why it irks me so much)...the tube is not in the vics mouth AT ALL, the paramedic is holding it beside the guys mouth, and the shot is from the same side, showing that the tube is nowhere near the guys mouth...OMG that drives me nuts!!! :mad: All they had to do was change the shot, and it would have looked realistic, but I guess because Hawkes was on the other side, they wanted him in the shot instead of the paramedic...
Click to expand...
That one in particular drives me nuts, mainly because it is so blatant and obvious. I saw that and I just went 'WTF?!?!?!?!'
 
weeza82 said:
Hi there,

This has driven me insane for sooooo long. If I am wrong please correct me.... Lindsay was 14 when she survived her friends deaths. This was apparently 10 years ago. Is Lindsay Monroe only supposed to be 24????? WTF?????
Click to expand...

That bugged the hell out of a lot of people! :lol:

First it was reported that Lindsay was supposed to be 18 at the time of the murders. Then TV Guide or somwhere else said 14. In the actual episode they never specified the girls' ages but, to me, in the flashbacks they all looked 12 - 14. Even if she was 18 that's better but still pushing it. Anna Belknap is 35 and looks it - and I don't mean that in a bad way.

But it makes sense when you consider this is the show that wants us to believe that an actress who is 5 years older than Melina Kanakeredes is suitable for the role of Stella's foster mother. :wtf: :rolleyes: :guffaw:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top