talkingtocactus
Coroner
*puts on agreeable hat*
exactly, i don't think it's necessarily always the content that's problematic but the way the content is arranged. i preferred the old 2-case format which allowed for much tighter case writing, because they had to be snappier, and avoided having too much airtime waiting to be filled, but still allowed enough for other things (like relationships of whatever kind) to be slotted in if they needed to be; i don't think anyone feels there wasn't enough of, say, frankie or peyton fitted in around the much more dominant csi bits, we were still able to get a grip on the dynamics of their relationships with stella/mac and see a bit of interaction, without it dominating the entire ep (obviously apart from in all access, but even then it was a 2 case ep, so it wasn't that dominant). i think there was enough to be able to know what was going on and get something of an insight into those personal things, without it feeling like filler or without feeling like it was being overblown to fill up dead space.
i agree about rose, that was a really important moment in mac's development, and while i think peyton was perhaps just an extended experiment in dating, i think aubrey's managing, a bit like rose, to bring mac out of his usual role a bit, which is great.
oh dear, you're not the only one that can ramble on
Elwood21 said:I agree about the show needing a kick and needing more challenging cases (for the characters and viewers both). I don't think it should jettison the inclusion of character-related material, but might perhaps sharpen how it's integrated. Flack still wins on that front this year. I don't actually think that S6 has been over-saturated with characters' personal material. I might tweak how some was written :lol: but not that it was there. Whatever is ailing the series, I think it stems from a noticeably flagging logic and consistency within the criminal framework that the show rests on. The cases alone have never been what drew me to NY, but they used to be ...juicier somehow, if also more tightly tied together by the ep's end. A tautly written balance and integration of characters and cases is what I'd love, whatever each component broaches weekly. I've said elsewhere that the characters need to be challenged, that if they, and we as viewers, are being run thru inanities to fill airtime, it's a waste.
exactly, i don't think it's necessarily always the content that's problematic but the way the content is arranged. i preferred the old 2-case format which allowed for much tighter case writing, because they had to be snappier, and avoided having too much airtime waiting to be filled, but still allowed enough for other things (like relationships of whatever kind) to be slotted in if they needed to be; i don't think anyone feels there wasn't enough of, say, frankie or peyton fitted in around the much more dominant csi bits, we were still able to get a grip on the dynamics of their relationships with stella/mac and see a bit of interaction, without it dominating the entire ep (obviously apart from in all access, but even then it was a 2 case ep, so it wasn't that dominant). i think there was enough to be able to know what was going on and get something of an insight into those personal things, without it feeling like filler or without feeling like it was being overblown to fill up dead space.
yeah i liked dunbrook - he was enough of a nemesis to give mac something to work with but different enough to, y'know, not be the killer which would've been far too obvious.Dunbrook was among the better imo, it was an interesting and nice change up of mini-twizt to have him be a solid nemesis w/o being the villain, or at least the main villain. Shades of grey are interesting too. </random related abstract hmm>
yep, definitely agree. whatever happened to gillian anyway? i thought she was good, both in terms of it being interesting to have a character link to the DA's office, and in terms of it being a possible romance for mac, i think she could've worked well in either role really.I would have mixed feelings on the possible introduction of a new Regular or Regularly-Recurring-Main-Not-Secondary Character. Were it to happen, I think I'd rather someone along the lines of a Sinclair or Gillian or Quinn, someone who can be a counterpoint, not necessarily a new team member.
i agree, i'm not really a peyton fan but i never totally hated her (hey, she's from round where i live, i have to defend her a bit!) and i think her biggest problem was the writing - having her introduced in mac's bed right from the off was a huge mistake, it just gave her no scope whatsoever for development, she was only ever going to be "mac's girlfriend", regardless of how much she wanted to be the ME; also it probably put a lot of people off her in terms of "oh well who's that horrible woman getting her claws into mac?" kind of reactions (although i wonder if maybe that was kind of the point - that the audience were meant to have been as surprised by it as the rest of the lab were when they found out, but given that only danny actually seemed surprised, i doubt it) - i think the way aubrey's been introduced much more slowly is definitely in her favour; plus even despite her limited screen time she's shown more depth than peyton ever did (which again is probably down to the writers rather than claire forlani), peyton was in the bed, then pushing mac around, then injured, then being kind of whiny in her trying to ask him to go to london; aubrey's already shown some of her interests, her work ethic (clearly similar to his), that she can do romantic gestures (the letters), and that she's quite willing to poke fun at mac (the pizza), and she's had far less time than peyton did. so yeah, i think a gradual introduction allows for better development and is probably advisable.I also think that while Aubrey's scenes in general have been limited, they've been knitted in pretty well. That whole "In The Field" thing people have mentioned. She was also even a plot pivot in RIP Marina, where she brought the clothes to the labs; that scene also happened to be backed by a minimalist but nice layer of character background for her, and had nice interaction with Mac; moreover it was prefaced with the really fun scene she had with Adam.
I think having Aubrey introduced and getting to know her at the same time as Mac gets to know her may mean that people can warm to her in her own right, and I think the scene with Adam was great in part for that reason. We're also not starting off as viewers trying to catch up on what brought them together as we were with Peyton. [That implication was clear, that it didn't matter so much as that the relationship gave Mac new circumstances to deal with and balance].
Backtracking, I thought Rose provided a cute scene and a Significant Moment for Mac. To a lesser degree, I think Aubrey's hit that mark and moved beyond, given that he took it upon himself to ask her out after their deli encounter and literal exchange of words. (Something he'd not likely have done before Peyton, and even Gillian).
i agree about rose, that was a really important moment in mac's development, and while i think peyton was perhaps just an extended experiment in dating, i think aubrey's managing, a bit like rose, to bring mac out of his usual role a bit, which is great.
definitely, i hope we get to see a different side to peyton this time, i'd hate it to just be a return to her whining at mac about how he's too secretive and blah blah.It will also be interesting to see what they've written for Peyton and how she comes across now that the anchors of being a love interest and NY ME are both in the past, and moreover, secondary to the case scenario that's brought her back.
yes, absolutely agree - they need to take some of the gloss off the crime element, ditch edna and get back out into the field of dealing with rat fishermen and homeless guys using bubblegum to retrieve bullets and so forth.I think the procedural stuff is such an incredibly familiar rhythm to viewers that the content within that framework needs to be stepped up, the show can't just blandly rely on the gadgets and multi-syllabic words to fulfill it's mandate. Still, I don't think giving the characters personal material or issues to deal with while/due tackling weekly investigations detracts from this, in fact one can help the other. I think there's room, and cutting it from the mix altogether would thin out the show and make it rather anonymous. It would also be easy to get lost if the show ignored the "NY" part of its name, which, implying the city and the characters as part of it, supplies the fodder for it all to begin with.
yes, i totally agree. i think mac is wonderful but if they keep plugging away at his workaholic no fun no sleep depressive side all the time it becomes samey - they need to start opening him up a bit, be that in a work context by giving him different challenges (like you said, budget cuts, how to juggle the structure of the lab, that kind of thing could be interesting) or in a personal context by giving him new relationships (not necessarily romantic, reed was a great development tool for mac, as were rose and peyton, and claire has been throughout). i think he does need to be challenged more - he's the boss after all and there are, or i assume there are, other elements to that job that only he can deal with and that directly impact the other members of the lab, seeing him deal with that kind of thing as well could be great. i guess some people might be inclined to see those things as rather dull and not what viewers want, but they've done a fair bit of team admin type stuff on criminal minds and that always works really well, like the recent thing with hotch stepping down and morgan taking over and then having to step down again - ok so the circumstances prompting thatwere somewhat non-adminy, but it showed that, well, admin doesn't have to be boring, kids! i've always enjoyed mac's previous run ins with sinclair, gerrard and so on, although i guess getting a new chief would look a bit odd, obviously mykelti can't do it anymore and i dunno, is a new police chief something that happens often? also the storyline around the budget cuts and adam provided a great opportunity for lab teamwork, and i've liked his forays into the legal system too, (eg the closer, greater good, er... gillian ) all of which must be fairly normal elements of his job - they really need to avoid turning him into a one trick pony.these are also the things that have been focused on to the point of formula with him, that have kind of relegated him to a certain function within episodes, perhaps because the case material in question doesn't challenge him much in how he has to go about it. I think he does need to be challenged more as a character, so that following the evidence means a convoluted riddle to unravel, protecting the integrity means confronting team members, budget cuts, politics, up to date equipment & tech, etc. again, it also means being held accountable, not just for his own actions or non-actions, but for those of his team (a la "how many grenades are you willing to jump on for your people"), pursuing justice might mean challenges in balancing the letter of the law and fallout from doing so, that sort of thing.
But I also think the added emotional component his being in a relationship could bring could be interesting and give him some added depth. I mean that while Mac could be implied as being in a relationship with dialogue and occasional scenes, the fact he's taking a chance on one could add subtext to how he deals with people and cases generally.
Being single and singularly driven, so to speak, has made Mac a bit of a dull boy, and one who could remain a largely predictable functionary even if the show was able to step up the cases. Mac is not as unpredictable a soul as PV might like to hint at, not in how he's come across in the last while.
oh dear, you're not the only one that can ramble on
Last edited: