byline
CSI Level One
I realize that they are not the same thing, but I'm also considering progression. In other words, over time, has Brass slowly been working his way down from the higher moral plane at which he started, to where he is now? I don't really have an answer for that, but this would be the kind of thing where a person wouldn't just wake up one morning and decide to take the law into his or her own hands; it would be a progression, one behavior resulting from an experience or set of experiences, which then sets up other experiences, hence other reactions, etc. Again, I don't really know, which is why I asked the question. Yes, I know that there have been instances when Brass clearly took the high road, and was incensed that others did not. But I'm also wondering if there have been clues -- even small ones -- that would point to a deterioration of that stance.Brass was in on the reverse forensics, but it wasn't at all the same thing. Playing out a fake crime scene in the media, where all the 'higher-ups' know (or would've, if McKeen hadn't screwed up), isn't the same as covering up an actual crime (which is a crime itself). Several times, Brass's clean image has been brought up - in For Warrick, Hollywood Brass - his nickname in Jersey was "Squeaky" or something. It's so out of character for him to do something like this. Even if he does feel guilt over not supporting Warrick, it shouldn't be enough to make him compromise principles he's apparently stuck to for decades. Plus, Warrick was actually innocent - Brass knows what Ray did.
I'm also trying to remember what happened in Jersey. Someone else mentioned it, and I can't remember either.