flying mouse
Witness
What I want for this show is logic. Can someone please fire Veasey and get a new writer for the show because logic is not one of her strong points.
Agreed. The show now seems to be determined to stop pretending a procedural show because it's way over PV's head to write with logic. Her speciality seems to be the soaps and she's not even good at that. :lol: She really should be fired.
Recently, I even started to wonder if she's secretely in love with Sinise and is envious of Stella because she gets to spend all the time with him. Further, all the characters Mac gets to be potential girlfriends are perfect and have never a dark side.
I thought that's because Gary sinise has power on it's producing, but if your theory is nearer the mark, that woman is hopeless.
I don't expect the show to be perfect but I can expect certain logic. I can expect storylines to be built up and followed up and not dropped out of nowhere and never get picked up again. Which is unfortunately the case. And it's getting worse. Episodes and their contents seem to be done at random, characters get taken in and pop in and out of the show at random as well, just whenever they please and are useful. That nothing's been built prior to that which justifies the characters or a character's reaction, that gets completely forgotten.
I definitely agree.
Characters like Aubrey and Peyton don't serve the purpose of the show. They are just there for the sake of being Mac's "love interest", however, that show is not about Mac's love life.
Drew and Frankie both served a purpose. It wasn't a pretty one. Yet they served the purpose of the show. Neither Aubrey nor Peyton do, so please, get rid of them. At least as appearing characters. If characters have relationships, they're entitled to but I don't need that on CSI NY.
...
Further they bring in episodes like GFD, Death House, Second Chances and even The Formula and then all of a sudden there's Aubrey and I ask myself what the hell is she needed for?
Aubrey is nothing but Mac's love life. But Peyton? I think in recent episode, she served the purpose as a momentum to draw Mac's attention to a certain crime. I've never liked her, though. And Aubrey.. She is cute! It's irony that the most useless character is becoming the most likable one to me! It's not like I want CSI: NY-MLS(mac's love story) but I hope to see her more. :lol:
I'd love for the show to respect their characters. They built characters and profiles and backgrounds. Now that they have, they manipulate them like kids manipulate their dolls. One minute the doll is rich and famous and at the beach but the next time the doll is not so well off and skiing in the alps. That's exactly what they're doing with the characters. One minute they're that, the next they're doing this and then it never happens again because it was just suited for that one single episode.
Profiles and established relationships between the characters are thrown into the trash and/or get ignored.
Agreed. But I think now is time to focus more on the case and logic and less on the character development, unless PV admits she's not good at real crimes or logic and prefers an easier way like filling up the airtime with clich love stories and empty family dramas.
Personally, I prefer Mac and Stella together, yet if they give him the girl from the street, I wouldn't mind as long as they don't ignore the friendship Mac and Stella have. Which they have done big time in some episodes this season.
...
They should stop forcing something between Mac and Stella. They've built something with them, a deep bond, a strong friendship, a relationship a lot of married couples don't even have. What in the world are they afraid of? Besides, what's done is done, there's no turning back now. Of course, there can be difficulties, there always are but those "difficulties" are brought in just for the sake of it and go against any logic. It makes those episodes mentioned seem as if they were brought in to increase the ratings and get up fans hopes and then they do/write whatever they want again.
I don't need Mac and Stella kissing all over the place. But their chemistry is great and so is that subtle flirting, the challenging, gestures like going for dinner after work at the end of the show. It's all that is needed because it keeps fans guessing, satisfies those who want them together and doesn't overshadow the show for those who don't watch it for them but for the CSI in general.
I don't know.. The reason I object Smack is that both of them are the main characters so their relationship would overshadow everything. They are sharing pretty much airtime already and their friendship and trust to each other can't be compared with the relationships they've been building with other characters. So they have deep bond, even chemistry, yes. But a couple... They go out to dinner or stop by each other's home or have outings that someone might call a date.. those things are not appearing on TV though. I think they are already doing it. I rather want those things to be in backseat so they won't overshadow the other characters and even crimes- the real purpose of this show.
The show has, as others said, more than Mac as a character. They could build something for Sid, for Adam and I agree - Mac needs to lose his hero status.
:thumbsup:
Overall but especially what the relationship with Mac and Stella is concerned, I get the feeling that someone in the higher positions cares a damn about what fans want. They have the power and they use that power, playing with the characters just because they can. Doing whatever they want, ignoring logic and continuity just because they can. Just because they want to show they have the power. That's the impression I get. It's childish and it's unprofessional and it's what'll be that shows death.
It goes the same with DL, I think. Anyway I agree - in a different perspective though because I don't support Smack; neither hardcored nor the fine line between friends and a couple version - with all my heart.
English is not my language so I have difficulties in explaining my thoughts. So there will be some nonsenses. But I tried.
Last edited: