I know you are right
Delynn. We just need to be more cival about the whole discussion; I'm referring to myslf as well.
It's been my experience, as an old woman
, that how people respond on any given matter relates directly to how they are treated. Most people give what they get.
One thing that has disturbed me somewhat is that while some can give a backhanded insult and get away with it; others are called on the carpet. Why is that?:wtf:
I think the moderators work overtime trying to be fair and keep everyone as respectful as possible. (And no, I'm not sucking up. I really think that.) But we're an unruly group and some of us are damned stubborn.
I think if you find a post or portion of a thread to be objectionable or abusive, you need to report it. I know the rare ocassion that I've been concerned about a post and asked moderators to take a look always makes me feel like I'm tattling. But the moderators can't be everywhere so we need to be proative and help 'em out.
While I don't mean to be insulting when I respond to post, I usually am pretty straightforward in what I say and my responses are usually in keeping with how I'm being addressed. I've had some very civil and pleasant debates on this forum with individuals who felt opposite of me on a subject. It was pleasant because we remained respectful of each other's position ... and in the end we agreed to disagree, thanked each other for the lively debate and moved on.
But it can be hard to walk away when you feel you've been insulted or that someone is being condescending. Boy don't I know it.
Again, moderators are there for a reason. I need to learn that lesson as well.
Back on topic now. I liked the idea of having two cases. With Calleigh and Eric being CSI 3s they could lead two different teams (with H supervising both of course). Team 1) Eric, Natalia, and Jesse, Team 2) Calleigh, Ryan, and Walter - The second team would be a hoot. :lol: This would also kind of solve the issue of certain team members being in a relationship. (This is all in my fantasy world). Screentime issues with the exception of the ocassional arc would be solved. If the writers do it right it could work. Frank could also be in there on one or the other case; somehow. Please forget about the lab rats; we have too many other main characters to be concerned about at this time. Oh and let's not forget about Kyle, he could pop in every now and then; But not full time.
Break up the Three Musketeers!
:lol: I really DO enjoy so much watching Jesse, Ryan and Walter work together. In your scenario, Natalia would have to give Jesse a pass for standing her up.
Do we know what level of CSI Jesse is and are we sure that Eric is a 3? Eric has had a significant number of issues in the last 4 years. Him getting a promotion of any kind would really tax my ability to suspend belief (Yeah, I know. This is CSI Miami - reality is a rare commodity.)
I'd almost rather see Jesse head a team of his own or as GNRF as suggested, have him go back to being a cop - like Frank.
I don't know about ditching
all the lab rats. I've kind of gotten attached to some of them. But I suppose they could weed 'em out a little.
And I don't want to see Horatio get lost in the shuffle.
Adam's return could be a good thing, if they do it right.
Although, TPTB has tunnel vision and can't see the bigger picture. Their track record speaks for itself.
TPTB and their inability to see the whole picture is what scares me with this whole thing. As you said, "Their track record speaks for itself."