Partly said:
Surreal_44 said:
Biggest Marty-Stu ever! Gah. I'd like him better if he didn't appear to be a genius in everything he did, when it's not possible for him to be like, uber-smart in everything he does. *sulks*
This doesn't bother me, as I see Hawkes as a prodigy. I think he's good at everything he does, not only because he is "uber-smart" but because he can't not be. I mean, to me he seems like the type of person who will become obsessed with something until he knews everything about it. I think this "brilliance" is off-set by his obvious inability to deal with deep interpersonal relationships. There's always a reticence in his manner whenever people try to get deep. Or for that matter his inability to do small talk (as evidenced in his exchange with Flack in "Slight out of Hand". My hope would be this obsessiveness could easily be written into a show as a character fault.
Besides, it's always easier to have one of the main characters do the work rather than write in a new lab "expert" into a scene.
Faylinn said:
They all do that.
Flack often will play the "straight man" to the lab techs' knowledge -- he's not afraid to ask the question that needs to be asked. Stella will also admit that she doesn't know all the answers. Danny... well, Danny claims a lot of experience in a lot of things, but with Danny being slightly ADD I can see how he would have flitted from one thing to the other, getting a passable knowledge of each of them. But Danny has also demonstrated complete failure in dealing with some things, as demonstrated by his personal problems.
Mac, on the other hand, seems to know everything. He rarely comes out and claims to, but he always has little facts and ready knowledge of what their cases deal with, from Japanese swords to magic to the security protocols of the UN. This also doesn't bother me, mostly because I adore Mac but also because he doesn't bring any pride or ego into the situation when he does this.