Jacks
Rookie
Re: Eric & Calleigh Thread #29: slkdjfhaslsjkdfhksajhkjhsdfomg!!!!!!!1
It's true. It's a huge generalization, and like you, I'm probably classified in the younger generation (I'm 22). When I say children, I don't mean children, and when I say most, I don't mean most. By children I mean people born between 1983 and 1993, and by most, I mean many more than should be. Obviously there are exceptions and amazing people of all ages, and I really shouldn't generalize. There's no explanation for my words except that it was an exhasperated generalization coming from a frustrating week, and it totally doesn't belong on this board.
Lucy, if only all children were like that, huh? Unfortunately most children today are inconsiderate, drug-addicted, self-centered, disrespectful assholes who should be in prison but aren't because the prison system can't hold the ridiculous number of children/young adults who break the law...so I would highly recommend staying away from them.
At the risk of inflaming a serious debate here... that is a HUGE generalisation. Okay, problems like that exist, but to say most is just wrong. And whilst I don't class myself as being in the child demographic, I am part of the younger generation... and I hate that the bad gets assumes of all of us. Sorry if that sounds unnecessarily antagonistic, it's not supposed to be.
It's true. It's a huge generalization, and like you, I'm probably classified in the younger generation (I'm 22). When I say children, I don't mean children, and when I say most, I don't mean most. By children I mean people born between 1983 and 1993, and by most, I mean many more than should be. Obviously there are exceptions and amazing people of all ages, and I really shouldn't generalize. There's no explanation for my words except that it was an exhasperated generalization coming from a frustrating week, and it totally doesn't belong on this board.