CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Discussion - Back in the Big Apple

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

I like this idea to present a new mother from this show.
Because in the beginnig csiny have so differently from csilv and csimiami
So i know the producter have ge a great history for Danny and Lindsay's pregnacy!!
This is news for csi
What ever.; This show is a accumulation of new history and I love that!!
I'll never so exeting to see a new storyboard with my favorite csi !!!
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

Okay, I know that I've mentioned before that I don't like this pregnancy thing, but I want to make my thoughts a bit clearer.

I am a D/L shipper.

There, I said it. I like them together. HOWEVER. Liking them dating mildly is a whole different concept from wanting them to get married, OR have a kid. Once you get two coworkers together on a TV show, together as in married or parents or both, you can no longer have a calm, comfortable scene between them. They're always married, or they always have that one thing in common. Plus, it takes away from the show because they're always going to want to show a happy family life. I don't want to know about Danny and Lindsay and [insert name here] Messer. I just don't care. I'm happy that JJ is pregnant on Criminal Minds, but her future husband isn't on her team. He can be that shadow in the background that maybe shows up once in a while to say goodbye as she goes to work in the morning. We don't need to see him all of the time. It doesn't need to be awkward.

Not all D/L fans are asking for this. I for one aren't.
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

imaguestage said:
racefh853629 said:
What does DTMFA mean, though?
Click to expand...

DTMFA = Dump That Mother F***er Already
Click to expand...

Thanks! I sat there for a while trying to figure that out... lol.

This is gonna be (one of) the last thing(s) I say about the pregnancy- I agree with whoever said that her getting pregnant will now make Danny and Lindsay together as in married and/or parents. Because it's true- When you get that on TV, that's it for those characters. They really can't be anything else to each other.

Even if TPTB play their relationship up to, "are you gonna pick up (the child) from the babysitter's?", and that's the only mention of it, you still know that any interactions are mother and father of a child (or husband and wife, if they get married) and not just coworkers.

Any Danny and Lindsay scene since Snow Day has been them as two coworkers in a relationship (and use the term how you will) and not just two coworkers. It just drives me nuts. I'm not happy about this, and I hope this doesn't become the whole focus of the show.

Anyway, on a more positive note, I can't wait for tonight's episode, ya'll!
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

I'm definitely looking forward to "Page Turner" - SID!!! :eek:

JellyBelly said:

Danny will no longer be the most important person in her life, I hope they explore that.
Click to expand...
Hopefully they will - maybe being a mother will make her a stronger character in some ways.

The only problem is the way all of the spoilers have seemed to deal with the pregnancy with regards to Danny rather than Lindsay.

Hopefully they'll do better than "Lindsay went over and banged Danny and boom! got pregnant" as Top said, but at this point, I'm still nervous about how they're going to handle it.

Corazon:

I agree that there seems to be kind of an overkill with DL-information and we don't seem to get any stuff about the others.
Click to expand...
I wish they'd answer some damn questions about Adam. *cranky* I sent Ausiello two, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who has asked about other characters--I mean come on, the man interviewed AJ and didn't even ask about his character? *cranky cranky cranky* :p
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

Faylinn said:
I'm definitely looking forward to "Page Turner" - SID!!! :eek:

JellyBelly said:

Danny will no longer be the most important person in her life, I hope they explore that.
Click to expand...
Hopefully they will - maybe being a mother will make her a stronger character in some ways.

The only problem is the way all of the spoilers have seemed to deal with the pregnancy with regards to Danny rather than Lindsay.

Hopefully they'll do better than "Lindsay went over and banged Danny and boom! got pregnant" as Top said, but at this point, I'm still nervous about how they're going to handle it.

Corazon:

I agree that there seems to be kind of an overkill with DL-information and we don't seem to get any stuff about the others.
Click to expand...
I wish they'd answer some damn questions about Adam. *cranky* I sent Ausiello two, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who has asked about other characters--I mean come on, the man interviewed AJ and didn't even ask about his character? *cranky cranky cranky* :p
Click to expand...

I know, I am so tired of ausiello answering just D/l questions, damn we already know their entire storyline..How about something on Flack/Hawkes/Sid/adam...Now, I love Danny, but enough of Lindsey and spoilers about her.
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

If there's one video I had to pick in response to what's coming up in the latter half of season five, it's this one. And I dedicate it especially to Danny Messer, you poor sod.

:guffaw: :guffaw: :guffaw:
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

Kimmychu said:
If there's one video I had to pick in response to what's coming up in the latter half of season five, it's this one. And I dedicate it especially to Danny Messer, you poor sod.

:guffaw: :guffaw: :guffaw:
Click to expand...

:guffaw: :guffaw: :guffaw: :guffaw: :guffaw:Knowing the CSI franchise's track record with spawn, and who the kid's mother is, I won't be surprised if that is exactly what he/she will be like. :guffaw:
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

:guffaw:

Kimmychu FTW!

It's not like I have a problem against Lindsay, but I do agree that this is very likely. Pretty much every child on a TV show is a pain in the a**. The only "child" that isn't a complete pain is Reed, and he isn't even related to Mac. XD
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

Tciddaisc said:
Pretty much every child on a TV show is a pain in the a**. The only "child" that isn't a complete pain is Reed, and he isn't even related to Mac. XD
Click to expand...

:guffaw: How true, how true! If Reed is the definition of 'isn't a complete pain', I'm laughing my ass off just wondering what a complete pain of a child will be like on the show!

Thanks for the links, Ghawazee!
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

You know, I just thought about this, though. For the most part, a child on a CSI is there strictly to cause drama. That's pretty much the only time they write them into the show is when they want them to cause trouble for a main character. So, yeah, they're all whiny little brats, but that's because that's all they're really being used for.

Not defending them, really, but just saying. How often to they show up when nothing's wrong?

Thanks for posting the links!!! :)
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

While I am a DL shipper, this pregnancy storyline for them doesn't exactly make me very happy. In fact, I'm pretty upset that they made it so that she went to Danny after their phone talk in "Personal Foul." It doesn't make much sense, IMO. I realize Anna being pregnant plays a major role in the PTB decision to have Lindsay pregnant too, but couldn't they just have her go on an extended vacation or something? I'd prefer to have Lindsay off the screen for a bit, even though I wouldn't get any DL scenes for a while, than seeing them have a baby together way too soon before they've even had a REAL, honest to God talk. But, of course, like almost everything else, that was probably done off screen. Anyway, I hope they're able to make this into a decent storyline and don't screw it up.
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

racefh853629 said:

For the most part, a child on a CSI is there strictly to cause drama.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah - when they get in trouble, when they get sick, when their school gets taken hostage by a baddie, etc. A non-hoodlum teenager is rare. Reed may not be that big of a pain in the arse, but he was definitely an aggravation in his appearances during the end of season 4 when he was a journalist.

Oh god, if they age this kid up, that will be a jump the shark moment if the kid itself doesn't turn out to be one. If the kid goes from infant to toddler between seasons without a time jump, I'll headdesk.
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

{{{{{ you're welcome}}}}} :)

I like how Stella, Sheldon and Hawkes look together. Maybe is this eppy going to be their episode?? :D Stella looks quite worried here. I wonder where and how the fireman will be included

Regarding the baby, i can't help but thinking actors' stories will be limited because their characters will be forever tie.

And you can't think giving them new stories and new relationships without the melodramma "Daddy is getting out with somebody else" "Mamma wants to have a new boyfriend but Daddy is possesive"

An interesting character as Rikki is left behind just for this

Of course, i'm upset for other things as how it will affect my fav ship and my fav characters' stories and my fav show, beyond that, i don't care (I guess that's enough)

Debbs :)
 
Re: CSI: NY Season 5 Spoiler Dicussion - Back in the Big Apple

Thanks for the links to the episodes

Ghawazee :D

Is it me, or does this episode look eerrily similar to LV's Unfriendly Skies?
I think Grissom and Mac have the same line :guffaw: :wtf:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top