What happened to CSI? I felt like I was watching a 3rd rate lame wanna be "Star Trek" episode, where were William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy? or the Hodges & Wendy show, what's next Archie and Henry? at least in "Lab Rats" they were accomplishing something, what was the point of this ep.? Hodges and his cheesy wig, having twisted fantasies about Wendy and Wendy in his 'dream sequences' writhing and slithering around, in a sequin type outfit.. I like her doing her lab work, but not seeing her in this capacity, even though it was in his obnoxious brain. Tacky.. He still doesn't have a clue he thinks he's cool. and he's so not...The rest of the cast were hardly there. Greg, where's the quirky fun loving guy we used to know? And Nick, Cath & Doc all seemed so disconnected Riley, why is she here?, her role so smallThe only constant and great was Brass, I didn't find this ep. cute, funny or interesting, just dumb. And at the end Dr. Langston, he's a classy, brilliant guy and talking about Orchids with Nick, this is a far stretch.. I can't imagine hm watching some Astro Sci-Fi DVD show and acting excited, unbeliveable, not his cup of tea.. how embarassing The last scene with Hodges and Wendy making goo-goo eyes at each other..gag me.. pathetic this is my opinion my views and my ideas~
I hardly think the odd episode that focuses on the supporting cast rather than the primary players is something to get this upset about. Out of 24 episodes in a season how many do they really do like this? It was definitely a different kind of episode than we're used to, but change shouldn't be something to fear and hurl tomatoes at. I'm sure we'll finish off the season with a lot more of the kind of episodes you're used.
The point of this episode was character exploration for people who are often "underwritten", but all the same just as loved as the characters
you like to see on screen all the time --words that were blatantly put into Wendy's mouth early on, I'd like to point out. Rather than outright burying this entire episode in negativity you might want to consider the possibility that every show isn't going to be written about your favorite characters, because there are more people in this cast. They have a whole cast of like 10 people to divide the screen time amongst, and I think they do a pretty good job of it.
It's a little close minded to think just because someone is a professional success they can't enjoy something with the masses ... like a TV show. Like ANY tv show.
*hint hint* I think if you take note of the clear parallels being drawn between CSI and it's fans and "AstroQuest" and it's fans you might find a lot more meaning in this episode. Science fiction has been credited as the inspiring factor for a
lot of scientific advancements, so it's hardly a stretch that a scientist might enjoy sci-fi, even if it seems "dumb" to you that's an insult to a lot of highly intelligent people who do enjoy the genre. It's also of interest to note that while CSI fits into the crime drama and procedural drama categories it is
also a sci-fi show, to a lesser extent.
Ultimately you might want to consider some of the morals and themes of this episode rather than just who was on screen and maybe you'll get something out of it. Keep in mind that these negative stereotypes you perpetuate of sci-fi fans can just as easily be put upon us as CSI fans. I'm sure there are a plethora of people out there who think procedural dramas and the people who watch them are just as 'dumb", but we all ought to know that's not the case.
In this episode Nick learned to find something of value in the "AstroQuest" show and learned that sci-fi aren't always as weird as they might seem to him. They just all share similar philosophies and are brought together by a story, even if it is a
campy story. I hope you can understand that too.