Search results

With regards to Keppler's position, I think it makes the most sense to assume that he's been hired in a supervisory position on Day. Catherine's showing him the ropes, giving him a sense of how the city works, but in the end they're the same rank and he defers to her in "Sweet Jane" because it's...

Erk, I'm sorry if I came across unnecssarily sharp. I like challenging other people's ideas as a way of conjuring conversation (and, to be honest, I like it when people do the same to me -- helps me better define my own position) but I can understand that not everyone is like that. Really, I...

Hey, hey. He'll be back. "Monster in a Box" isn't so far away. :)

See, that's what bothers me. I've said earlier that I wish the team had more faith in that, even if her behaviour's a little strange or secretive, she isn't doing something blatantly illegal, yet here we are with Nick implying just that. We'll have to see how it plays out in the episode, but...

Do you happen to have the full article or just the cover page? Although, he is very pretty, so I don't much mind. ;)

Like I said earlier, Nick's tone in that scene is definitely accusative: if she's abrasive, it's because he's implying she's up to something unseemly. Oh, Keppler. Yeah, plainly this is all his fault, as he showed up for work that morning. ;)

The "tragic" versus "redemptive" angle is really, really interesting. I am really glad Schreiber was given such a free hand in the creative process here. Must have made for a fascinating process. I guess I'm still in denial (... just a little) about the fact they'll likely kill Keppler off in...

Re: Paul/Brass #2 I don't think he does, does he? It'd be a bit poor of them if he did, not showing up when he'd been shot. :P

I don't know but, boy, I hope it does. I'll quite literally die of cute. *loves Hodges and, um, is kinda fond of Keppler too, as is likely obvious*

Like others have said, it's hard to draw conclusions from promotional materials but it seems to me that by the time of that clip of Nick questioning Catherine he's been fishing for information for a while. That tone is definitely accusatory. Whatever made him suspect Catherine's already...

I'm not sure what knowing him personally has to do with anything. That's like saying you won't follow the advice of your cardiologist until you've taken him out for dinner and drinks first. The man's an experienced CSI with (presumably) good references that is, unless I'm misinterpreting...

It's true that the team could be reasonably trusted with this information but, in my opinion, it only takes one person to screw up and blow the whole operation. They're human beings; they make mistakes (as pretty much every character can at some point in their career attest -- including...

Ahh, my bad. For some reason, I'd got my dates mixed up. Sorry one and all.

You really do have to wonder why they had that little subplot, anyway. It doesn't seem to have had any purpose whatsoever and given that this tidbit's coming from the finale -- 'Fallen Idols' is the finale, right? -- you've got to wonder if the divorce is going to warrant even more than a couple...

To be honest, I think this entire arc is meant to seriously mess with our heads -- particularly when it comes to Keppler's characterization. But what I've got to say about that covers more than just "Redrum", so I'll take it to the other board.

I'm interested that you're willing to throttle Keppler for something that everyone's mostly agreed is the fault of the "higher ups". Sure, it was his (admittedly unorthodox) idea, but there's no evidence to suggest that he's twisting Catherine's arm that I've observed. All four people at that...

Re: Would you like TPTB to kill off a character? **NO SPOILE You know, I'm not enamoured with Sofia particularly, but it'll be a happy day for me when TPTB stop looking at my homicide detectives as expendible. It's bad enough the format of CSI has pretty much robbed them of their, well...

That's a really interesting point. Sure, the guy's a sensitive sort, but if the rumours are true about festering resentment stemming from this episode that means even a full explanation of what's going on isn't enough to heal the wounds this will cause. Which still seems like one hella big...

Actually, what I meant to imply was that -- while she might feel hurt that Grissom was freezing her out -- she wouldn't have supported any "rebellion." She certainly wouldn't have concluded that they "can't trust Grissom". She knows the man too well to think he'd be behaving like this without...

Re: Season 7 Pictures **Possible Spoilers** ... who'da thought it'd take an episode of CSI of all things to actually locate hi-res photographs of Liev Schreiber. Nevertheless, I'm so not complaining. :) These are great! Thanks much.