talkingtocactus
Coroner
Re: What Are You Reading?-#3
^ i've heard that is a good book, it's one of those on my to do list, i think i'll have to get around to it!
yep - well obviously for my diss etc i ended up reading a lot of first hand accounts and he really did get it right, especially as you say the futility which for me is the overriding aspect of the entire war. and i know exactly what you mean about the romance - i felt the same!
^ i've heard that is a good book, it's one of those on my to do list, i think i'll have to get around to it!
I'm reading Birdsong now, and really enjoying it. I didn't mind the romance subplot but it seemed a bit silly and out of nowhere to me, I mean Stephen moves into this French guy's house and straight away he just has to have the guy's wife? I do believe in instant chemistry etc but it still seemed a bit odd, perhaps because I never 'felt' the chemistry between them. Then it got to the 1916 bit. I think the whole description of life in the trenches and the utter futility of it all is amazing, Faulks really seems to 'get' it. The descriptions of the tunnellers' work is particularly well written, I think, and disturbing.
yep - well obviously for my diss etc i ended up reading a lot of first hand accounts and he really did get it right, especially as you say the futility which for me is the overriding aspect of the entire war. and i know exactly what you mean about the romance - i felt the same!
absolutely, once they got past the propaganda of the other side being evil monsters, i think there was a lot of common ground. perhaps less so in WW2 because so many germans were nazis and i think they were inevitably harder to empathise with. but yes, i like stuff that shows the human element, that there were good guys on all sides, really. and yay AMC!I'm looking forward to reading 'All Quiet' because it gives the same story from the 'other' side. As for what you say about experiences of the war being very similar, I think that's bang on. In 'The Victors' which I read a while ago, the author mentions that many American veterans of WW2 actually got along with and liked the Germans they met at the end of the war best out of all the various nationalities they met, basically because of Germany being at that time, in some ways, quite progressive and forward thinking, like America at that time, which I thought was very interesting. Of course that is shown in films like AMC (had to mention it:thumbsup and Joyeux Noel too.
i went to his house! it was so cool he's a great writer, i still highly recommend 'the moon is down' for you, i think you'd like it. and 'cup of gold' was really good too, although really different from later stuff he did in many ways.Sounds interesting. I love Steinbeck too.
haha yeah that always makes people laugh i get the impression she doesn't hate the shows, but she does have a few gripes - partly that they simplify the process to a point where resemblence is almost lost, which i don't really see a problem with that because hey, it's entertainment! but the other gripes she had i can see her point - one was that numbers of forensics courses and students have soared and now people seem to think they can just do a degree in forensics and go straight into a glitzy crime lab, which isn't how it works at all, and also that juries won't notice any non-forensic evidence in court - she said a lot of crimes are solved by just detective work and forensic evidence is minimal but if a jury don't see dna and so on they think the case must be at fault, they assume that forensic evidence is all that counts, and given how often the csi shows state that evidence is what solves crimes, i can see her point. that must be pretty frustrating.LOL at the 'sucking a dead man's.....' thing. That sounds interesting. I think real life CSIs must hate the shows because they are pretty unrealistic, but then I don't watch for the forensics, I watch for one particular scientist/detective.