La_Guera said:
I understand identifying with and being protective of your favorite character. I did it all the time with Snape, and I do it all the time with Flack, but I can't help but suspect that character loyalty has clouded the central issue of responsibility. Saying that Danny is in some measure responsible for what happened on that street corner won't send Kevlar!Flack and the Super SWAT Squad crashing through his door with handcuffs and hot needle in hand. Nor does such a conclusion mean that Danny was intentionally negligent or acted with malicious intent. It just means that his actions contributed to Ruben's death. And they did.
If we're supposed to give Danny a free pass because OMG, it's Danny and he didn't mean for it to happen, then why isn't the same free pass being extended to Laughing Larry, who is being cheerfully held accountable for a thirty-year-old drowning at which he was not present and which he therefore could not have prevented? All he did was sell an admittedly cheap toy, but because Flack and Lindsay didn't like him, fandom is only too happy to attach more culpability to him than they are to woobie Danny, who could've done more before and after the shooting to possibly alter the tragic outcome. Methinks it's the Laura J. Dampcoot Law of Inverse Proportionality at work. The hotter the guy involved in a matter of dubious ethics or morality, the less responsibility and fewer consequences he must accept. Using this complicated principle, we can see that a cop with the hotness of Flack will never suffer any consequences, whereas Andy Sipowicz would be stripped to his skivvies, covered in ants, slathered in barbecue sauce, and torn apart by jackals.
Danny is partially responsible, period.
The reason Laughing Larry goes down in my book has little to do with looks and more to do with he was directly responsible for a child's death. He made a toy, claimed it was a submarine and kids being stupid kids believed it and drowned.
The reason I don't believe Danny is responsible is because I don't think he could have left the scene and he did what he thought was best. Get Ruben out of immediate danger. Which is exactly what I would have done. He had two choices, send Ruben home or keep him there at the scene until help arrived and I firmly believe that no kid should be stuck in that chaos.
The only fault I find in his action is not checking in. Which is where I do start making excuses because he's my favorite charactor . He hadn't gotten much sleep, he didn't think there was any reason to. He clearly thought that Ruben was fine, and of course I've chosen not to read into it because if he had we wouldn't have gotten the scene where he first sees him.