I just had a thought about the whole "dna of a killer" thing. Maybe what the "dna of a killer" means is that maybe the new guy's relative is a killer and he has to deal with that. Maybe he wonders "Well, if my relative was like this, does that mean I could be too?" Just an idea.
It was mentioned somewhere else on the 'net about the possibility of him having a double Y chromosome. From what I hear it's extremely rare and allegedly a predictor of violent behavior. Remember, he said "CSI Universe or Spectrum" or something like that. That means that it could be Vegas, NY or Miami. We'll just have to wait and see.
That would be really really REALLY stupid. That research is completely outdated and was thrown out. The scientific community accepts that there is no correlation between violent behaivour and the extra Y. Almost every male with that doesn't even know about it, because there isn't a significant difference between them and genotypically normal males. There definitely wouldn't be any 'struggle'. Even with relatives with violent behaivour this wouldn't happen...the genetics for criminal behaivour isn't that strong. And my genetics text books are pretty recent...
That's why I said "Allegedly being a predictor of violent behavior." With that informed knowledge, and what was also posted above about it not being a big deal, I hope they don't go there with it.
From what I understand, certain predispositions to mental illness and autism spectrum disorders can be passed genetically, but none of those are certain, and not necessarily predictors of violent behavior. So...yeah. I agree, that I'd like to see something unique and not already disproven.
Yeah, the miniature killer story went down the tube with GSR. That was stupid and pointless, i don't like that they are beating the dead horse.
Yeah....Besides, she had a psychotic break with reality. No mental health professional would find her fit to stand Trial. She was catatonic, talking to people who weren't there, etc. Research shows that in order to be competent to stand trial, you have to be able to consult with your attorney with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and have rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings going on.
It's unclear what happens afterwards, but obviously, since Natalie was a danger to herself and others, she was locked up. Then, one is held until they're competent or committed indefinitely/treated.
Here's an article I found online about competency and standards, if you care to read it.
http://aja.ncsc.dni.us/courtrv/cr37/cr37-2/CR37-2ZapfRoesch.pdf
Also, she never set out to go after Grissom. It was after Dell blew his brains out that she really lost it. I can believe that happened, just because she was pretty psychotic and out there (why did she push her sister out of the treehouse if she wasn't) However, I'd think that she'd go after Grissom, personally, but oh well.
Either way, I'm not thrilled that she's coming back. I think her story is done, and anything else is beating a dead horse.