*breathes deeply* Have I mentioned before that I love a good discussion? *pets TalkCSI*
I also think that there's no basis for comparing Lindsay's characterization with Angell's since Angell was a minor, recurring character who wasn't meant to be anything more than a 'detective' to do Flack's job when he wasn't working both cases. Lindsay is one of the main characters and should be more rounded than a recurring character.
It's been established (at least in the online bio) that Hawkes was a prodigy. With Lindsay, I wonder if they even considered the time it would take for her to become a CSI?xfcanadian said:
Yeah, like the fact that we're supposed to believe she's in her mid-twenties, given her years as a CSI and the training she would have had to get beforehand?
I would say that Hawkes is more unrealistic for this category, since he is WAY to young to be a forensic pathologist...
Not everybody goes into the same detail or to the same extreme to define a Mary Sue--it depends on the person. *shrug* I'm not saying you're wrong, but I don't think we're wrong either.midnight_tiptoes said:
If you put Lindsay through a Mary Sue litmus test, you don't get that high of a reading.
There was apparently a spoiler about him translating French or whatever, but that wasn't in the show and didn't actually happen. So saying that he knows different languages doesn't make a lot of sense to me since there's been no proof of that...Though Lindsay knows about cows and farming and shit, that, to me is a BILLION times more realistic than Mac knowing every single thing about everything that's ever been in this world, including a myriad of foreign languages.
Expressing criticism always comes down to 'only the haters feel that way.' I'll express criticism of any of the characters, even the ones I actually like. I generally have more to criticize about Lindsay, but the others aren't immune from my bitchiness.Only Lindsay haters seem to think she's special or perfect.
Uh, I'd care. Hawkes might not get as much fangirl love, but I'm not talking about Hawkes or Danny or anybody else when I'm talking about Lindsay. Whoever she's with, the character doesn't seem to have much substance beyond that 'relationship.'Lindsay's biggest downfall is being Danny's love interest, plain and simple. If she were dating Hawkes, no one would care cause no one worships Hawkes.
My thing with Danny/Angell is that I liked the idea in fanfiction, and if they had to go with one or the other on the show itself, I would have preferred Danny/Recurring Character rather than Danny/Main Character. I also think people were open to the potential of Angell as a love interest because we hadn't seen her in that role--I've seen the way they portray Lindsay in that role and I'm not convinced. *shrug*Funny that more people were pro-Danny/Angell, and to me, Angell exhibited more Mary Sue qualities, or at least had the potential to be a bigger Mary Sue, than Lindsay.
I also think that there's no basis for comparing Lindsay's characterization with Angell's since Angell was a minor, recurring character who wasn't meant to be anything more than a 'detective' to do Flack's job when he wasn't working both cases. Lindsay is one of the main characters and should be more rounded than a recurring character.
Yep. Also, part of the Mary Sue trend is trying so hard to not have a Mary Sue that it ends up being one on another part of the spectrum. Rather than being super-sexy and knocking all of the guys' socks off, the girl is the opposite, just being Plain-Jane but still attracting the attention of the guy who has said he's not looking for love, blah blah blah...Anna Belknap is an attractive woman, and it seems that Lindsay is deliberately made to cover up some of that, which doesn't make sense. *shrug*Top41 said:
That's true, though she's so plain it seems like they went out of their way to make her Average American Gal--ie, someone any fan could see herself as.
Yes. I don't see much, if anything, that seems to be about Linday herself (and I'm not even talking about Danny)--even when the character gets a touch of development, it always swings right back to Danny in the same frickin' episode.everclaire said:
It’s as though Every. Single. Thing. that happens in the show these days is to further their relationship.
Exactly. What makes a difference is what else is there, what the character is above and beyond those cliche, Sue-ish aspects of their personalities. Lindsay doesn't seem to have much...Yes, all the CSI's on all three shows have Mary Sue or male equivalent characteristics to some extent, with their secrets, tragic pasts, a general lack of living family members, and amazing skills coupled with serious investigative prowess. Wow, those guys are incredible!...The difference really is that some of the characters have been developed better than others, as more rounded and likeable, their cliched attributes used positively and to the benefit of the overall storyline.
Danny isn't the lead, but he's astonishingly popular amongst the fans. When I first came into the fandom, I was surprised by how popular he was. The character grew on me, and yeah, I'm a fan, but even as my personal love for the character has waned recently, my opinion about Lindsay hasn't changed. The fact is that Lindsay came and was immediately pushed toward Danny. The writers are more than aware of Danny's popularity with the fans. It doesn't seem accidental to me. *shrug*midnight_tiptoes said:
Why? Danny's not special and he's not the lead, and he's just one of many cast members. I know he's a demigod around here, but his opinion means nothing to me. Is one Danny worth like 40 Stellas or 30 Hawkes or 4 Macs or something? Point still remains - only one character finds her cool or whatever, the others seem to see her as I see her - some random chick from the Midwest.
But that's part of it. She goes from being totally unphased to completely overwhelmed in the blink of an eye, and then goes from overwhelmed to totally-over-it just as quickly. The writing was ham-fisted, and that's where the fault lies with those problems--suddenly being overwhelmed by something that happened in your past is realistic for some people, but for someone like me who hasn't been through a similar situation, a bit of an explanation would have been nice. It's not all down to the characterization, but also how the writers portray the character, and while they apparently didn't have time to give more information about Lindsay dealing with her past, they sure found time for her to suddenly be OMG-SO-OVER! it to pull Danny back for a kiss in front of the reporters.A whole year went by without Lindsay ever exhibiting any problems wrt her past. Since she went to Montana and dealt with it, we've seen her very cheerful and happy. Well, normal at least.
The trial told us exactly what happened, Danny going was unnecessary to understanding her past. It could have been done well, but with the end result being the last scene that we got, it's not hard to see what the writers were going for. Have they ever done something for Lindsay and just Lindsay?If Mac hadn't become Exposition Harry in that one episode she went away and if Danny hadn't gone to the trial, we never would've found out what actually happened.
Danny is the most popular guy with the fangirls, that's a pretty sure thing. Maybe not on every message board, or in every online community or whatever, but overall he's wildly popular. And a lot of people here like him, but that doesn't automatically mean that they feel Linday is a Mary-Sue because of that.It's Mary Sue-ism in the eyes of the people who like the guy she's getting together with, which just proves how subjective Mary Sue-ism has become.
Not necessarily. Definitions of what makes a Mary Sue vary depending on who you ask. Lindsay might be a Mary Sue according to some definitions but not according to others.But Mary Sue-ism isn't like beauty, it's something you either are or you aren't
Ooh, please to be taking pictures if you do.Dude, I may go to Miami tomorrow! If I run into David Caruso I'm totally gonna throw an ice cream cone at him.
This is very true.This show will never be what it used to be.