dobebabygirl said:when i drink a few glases of champaign or wine - what does it say - I'm an addict?
Do you drink a glass of champagne every couple of hours and go through three bottles of wine a day? That's what nicotine addiction (not saying everyone who smokes is insanely addicted) does to people. It doesn't mean they're at the same calibre as someone who uses heroin or cocaine, but it's still an addiction. People can be addicted to anything, (hell, even sex and video games) it just depends on how much and how potentially harmful the substance is.
I've even heard some people think that marijuana is 'just recreational' and 'we only do it socially' or 'once in a while'. Well, that may be for 90% of people but marijuana is addictive too, just as addictive as alcohol, in fact. Doesn't mean everyone will get addicted but it does happen to a small percentage.
come on comparing nicotine to drugs is so lame, heroin and cocaine those might be really addictive drugs but you can't say its as addictive as nicotine. i hate statements like that - it's nonesense
The American Heart Association deems nicotine very addictive. They claim "Nicotine addiction has historically been one of the hardest addictions to break."
It is a drug. Definition of a drug:
-A chemical substance, such as a narcotic or hallucinogen, that affects the central nervous system, causing changes in behavior and often addiction.
-psychoactive drug , psychotropic drug see under substance.
From the AHA (link found above): "Nicotine is an addictive drug. It causes changes in the brain that make people want to use it more and more. In addition, addictive drugs cause unpleasant withdrawal symptoms"
From eMedicine: "Nicotine meets the criteria of a highly addictive drug. Nicotine is a potent psychoactive drug that induces euphoria, serves as a reinforcer of its use, and leads to nicotine withdrawal syndrome when it is absent. As an addictive drug, nicotine has 2 very potent issues: it is a stimulant and it is also a depressant."
So, I would say it is a drug and people can become very addicted. Again, it doesn't mean it's at the same calibre as methanphetamines or heroin but saying that comparing nicotine to drugs is lame, well, in my opinion isn't lame.
Health Canada claims: "Nicotine causes chemical and biological changes in the brain. Although it is less dramatic than heroin or cocaine, the strength of the addiction is just as powerful. It is a “reinforcing” drug, which means that users desire the drug regardless of the damaging effects."
A smoker can quit right away - if he really wants to - but an addict to herion - have fun with that...
They also go on to claim:
-Withdrawal symptoms can be severe and many smokers might not be able to quit on their first attempt because of these symptoms, and a lack of preparation to cope with withdrawal.
-The most severe withdrawal symptoms occur within the first week although the craving for cigarettes can persist for months even years. The desire to smoke can be especially strong when a person is under stress although others crave cigarettes while socializing or when bored. The typical withdrawal symptoms are:
- headaches
- anxiety and irritability
- difficulty concentrating and sleeping
- hunger
- decreased heart rate and blood pressure
- craving for nicotine
_Hush_ said:What kind of a lame excuse is that? You don't smoke because it's hard to quit, you smoke because of your own reasons. Saying you're using because it's hard to quit is an excuse for not trying to. It's weak, and almost a bit of an insult. If you really wanna quit, trust me, you will.
:lol: I think there's half-truths to what those kids are saying. I think on the one hand, it's an excuse but on the other hand, it might very well be hard. But yeah, it really is their decision to start and if they won't even try to quit because they don't want to, that's up to them.
just because someone's a smoker he doesn't have to die from it
You're right. We could get hit by a bus tomorrow or our heart could just give out and it may not have anything to do with smoking. But it also doesn't mean a smoker's health won't be compromised, even if they do live to be 90.
I'm not saying no one should smoke--ultimately it's their decision. But some do die from smoke-related illness so that's why a lot find it to be such a problem.
Last edited: