Re: Has CSI:Miami evolved more into a soap opera than a forensics show
Has CSI:Miami turned into a soap-opera? Hell yes!!! If someone said to me "Quick! Name one of the crimes or victims from an episode from this season without including any personal drama of any of the characters" I honestly couldn't recall any of them. I can't remeber any of the cases,I only remember H's baby mama drama and some moments of Calleigh/Eric.I've said this in another thread,but it's amazing that I can recall specific cases from seasons1-3 and yet the seasons of latter hasnt produced not one memorable case for me.
I think the writers of Miami have given up on writing about REAL crimes and have focused on giving character drama becuase its easier and since it is a show that is now known for going over the top,they can get away with it! When writing about crime,you actually have to make sure everything fits into place and that there are no loopholes,ect. There is a lot to think about,so I'm sure its a lot easier to fill up 40 minutes with H drama. And let's face it! Everyone loves drama. As someone said earlier,if you want a CSI show that still has more balance between the actual cases and drama filler,your best bet is either Vegas or NY.
Miami even took a potential good story line and turned it bad IMO.For instance,CSI:NY was the first CSI to have the "lost-son-I-never-knew-of-pop-out-of-the-blue" with Mac and Reed. They used it as a moment of character delepment,not just for Mac but his step-son. With the exception of the last 3 episodes in which Reed has a big role,we rarely see him,yet we know he's there and there's an impact.CSI:Miami,on the other hand,took the H and Kyle thing and...well,they simply beat a dead horse to the ground,propped it back on sticks and beat it again. We simply didn't need whole episodes surrounding this drama!I almost think the writer knew the cases in those episodes were extremely weak and threw in that stuff just so people would focus on that more! IMO,that is lazy! You shouldn't cover up bad writing/bad acting with a whole lot of melodramatics
I wish I could say,like most of you, that I could never stop watching this show (and several years ago,I would have sworn I would never stop watching!),but I've just realized that CSI Miami actually gets the tivo treatment in my house and IF there is nothing else on or I find myself extremely bored and it hasnt been deleted,I'll watch it.Even then,I always manage to fast forward through a lot of predictable parts or delete it half way through. I'm still a fan and I'm entertained to a degree by it,but I shouldn't have to watch this show with the same mindframe as I would watch a cartoon or soap opera. CSI:Miami,youre better than that! Let's get some stronger cases for season 7 and re-learn the difference between good subtle character development (seasons 1-3) and OTT character drama.
Has CSI:Miami turned into a soap-opera? Hell yes!!! If someone said to me "Quick! Name one of the crimes or victims from an episode from this season without including any personal drama of any of the characters" I honestly couldn't recall any of them. I can't remeber any of the cases,I only remember H's baby mama drama and some moments of Calleigh/Eric.I've said this in another thread,but it's amazing that I can recall specific cases from seasons1-3 and yet the seasons of latter hasnt produced not one memorable case for me.
I think the writers of Miami have given up on writing about REAL crimes and have focused on giving character drama becuase its easier and since it is a show that is now known for going over the top,they can get away with it! When writing about crime,you actually have to make sure everything fits into place and that there are no loopholes,ect. There is a lot to think about,so I'm sure its a lot easier to fill up 40 minutes with H drama. And let's face it! Everyone loves drama. As someone said earlier,if you want a CSI show that still has more balance between the actual cases and drama filler,your best bet is either Vegas or NY.
Miami even took a potential good story line and turned it bad IMO.For instance,CSI:NY was the first CSI to have the "lost-son-I-never-knew-of-pop-out-of-the-blue" with Mac and Reed. They used it as a moment of character delepment,not just for Mac but his step-son. With the exception of the last 3 episodes in which Reed has a big role,we rarely see him,yet we know he's there and there's an impact.CSI:Miami,on the other hand,took the H and Kyle thing and...well,they simply beat a dead horse to the ground,propped it back on sticks and beat it again. We simply didn't need whole episodes surrounding this drama!I almost think the writer knew the cases in those episodes were extremely weak and threw in that stuff just so people would focus on that more! IMO,that is lazy! You shouldn't cover up bad writing/bad acting with a whole lot of melodramatics
I wish I could say,like most of you, that I could never stop watching this show (and several years ago,I would have sworn I would never stop watching!),but I've just realized that CSI Miami actually gets the tivo treatment in my house and IF there is nothing else on or I find myself extremely bored and it hasnt been deleted,I'll watch it.Even then,I always manage to fast forward through a lot of predictable parts or delete it half way through. I'm still a fan and I'm entertained to a degree by it,but I shouldn't have to watch this show with the same mindframe as I would watch a cartoon or soap opera. CSI:Miami,youre better than that! Let's get some stronger cases for season 7 and re-learn the difference between good subtle character development (seasons 1-3) and OTT character drama.
Last edited: