That rubbed me wrong, and I couldn't shake why until I came across something on a different site that mentioned it, and now I understand my own feelings on the matter. I sure as heck don't want to turn a fun discussion thread into a bed of US healthcare wank, but...Then, Mac, as the mouthpiece of the writers, took the complex issue of U.S. healthcare and reduced it to a smug, glib, privileged, pithy soundbyte.
I didn't like the implication that 'if you don't have adequate insurance, you should just accept your fate and die with dignity,' as if that's a person's patriotic duty as an American. It's a tough pill to swallow when a person could live a bit longer, perhaps in less pain, and still 'die with dignity' given the best medical care available (and don't we Americans like to crow that we have the best medical care in the ~world~?). It just bothers me that we're supposed to set our jaw and nod along with Mac that yes, indeed, if a person doesn't have adequate insurance they should just keep their mouth shut and die quietly - even though there are medical advances that could extend and improve what remains of their life. The Have-Nots clearly don't deserve access to those advances.
And as someone mentioned earlier in the thread (sorry, I can't remember who it was, and I don't have the time just now to look for the appropriate post), after he was arrested he was given medical care - as a murderer he had access to medical care he was denied as an average, dying American citizen?
Yeah, it rubs me wrong. It rubs me very wrong. :scream: