talkingtocactus
Coroner
Desert Dracula said:Just a suggestion, read the Bible
Thing is... I have read it. The only thing it did was further convince me that the god concept is logically impossible and that religious dogma is dangerous.
Besides, there's no reason for me to believe that the Bible is any more or less divinely inspired than, say, the Koran, or any more or less spiritually valid than, say, the Sutras, the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, etc.
^ this, basically.
That's sad for me, that one feels that way who do you think Adam and Eve were? & where did they sprout from?, and Moses and Noah, the list is endless.
as for this ^ - i also don't believe adam and eve existed, i don't believe humans "sprouted from" anything, i believe that we evolved slowly and over a very long period, we didn't just appear suddenly. i also believe that evolution is far more scientifically quantifiable/falsifiable (according to popper's theory of falsifiability, which means that actually it's pretty proveable, it's just that popper decided to take the backwards approach! - this is a better explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability) than any religious theory. the problem of course is that people see the word "theory" in evolutionary science and assume that it's meant in the general sense of the word (ie "unproven conjecture") and not the scientific sense (ie "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge"). the fact is that the word theory when applied to science has a much stronger foundation than it does in a more general sense.
as for moses and the like - i actually do believe in those people, hell, i even believe that jesus existed. however, i don't believe that they were anything more than people, they didn't have divine power or anything, they were, at best, nothing more than very convincing. there is definite historical evidence for moses and the exodus, it's there in egyptian documents (well, stone tablets mainly). i believe that there was a guy living in nazareth called jesus - i don't believe he was divinely born or immaculately conceived, nor do i think he was divine in any way shape or form - he may well have been a convincing speaker though, basically exactly like mohammed in the islamic faith, he was a very savvy guy who managed to get people's attention with his ideas. evidence for noah seems a tad unsubstantiated. i actually think the idea of a great flood seems totally plausible, something like a tsunami (which we now know, of course, comes from natural causes like undersea volcano eruptions, tectonic shifts etc) could account for the fact that there are so many apocryphal stories about a great flood. however, i believe that this is all these are: apocryphal stories. the bible was written a long time after the event(s), and was written from stories that were handed down over generations by word of mouth - which is exactly what happened in regions and languages all over the world, but inevitably stories get changed over time (and definitely over centuries) and they become legendary or mythical so that when they are finally written down they're of epic proportions. this also explains the fact that the great flood story of noah fame is present in the apocrypha of many communities, tribes and religions from all over the world - it suggests that there *was* a flood, but each community experienced it differently (which for me cancels out the idea of having all the animals of the world on board the ark, because how would noah, in the middle east, have access to the millions of species all over the world?).
ok, that was something of a digression, sorry...
Last edited: