David Rambo

i really liked that he mentioned Paul Guilfoyle. he's not been appreciated enough, imo. he and Marg will be the two last things that are going to keep the old CSI together the most. i'm pretty sure the next season will be leading up to Catherine's departure and her going for the Sam's business. Brass will be the last one to hold that old CSI feel to it, then. i don't mean that George, Eric and Robert don't have it, it's just that, imo, their characters aren't as colorful and memorable as Brass is. Greg has grown up a lot, and he's not that playful boy he was but a serious man just as much as Nick is.

so yeah, i don't think George's or Eric's exits would mean as much as Paul's. hopefully for CSI he'll stay as long as the show runs. i cannot imagine CSI without him. no Grissom, Sara, Catherine and Brass means a different show.
 
i really liked that he mentioned Paul Guilfoyle. he's not been appreciated enough, imo. he and Marg will be the two last things that are going to keep the old CSI together the most. i'm pretty sure the next season will be leading up to Catherine's departure and her going for the Sam's business. Brass will be the last one to hold that old CSI feel to it, then. i don't mean that George, Eric and Robert don't have it, it's just that, imo, their characters aren't as colorful and memorable as Brass is. Greg has grown up a lot, and he's not that playful boy he was but a serious man just as much as Nick is.

so yeah, i don't think George's or Eric's exits would mean as much as Paul's. hopefully for CSI he'll stay as long as the show runs. i cannot imagine CSI without him. no Grissom, Sara, Catherine and Brass means a different show.

I don't agree, I think they all bring something special to the show. You may not see that way, but as far as I can see, each of them add something unique. I don't think it's fair to pit one character against another and you may not be doing this, but that's how it comes across the screen to me.
 
i did say they all do, but i think Brass would be a bigger blow to the show if he was gone (and everybody's exit from the main cast is already huge, i'm not denying that). but you can find a younger, handsome, likeable actor easier than somebody as original as Paul who is a little older and wants to be a part of a TV series for an unknown number of years. but that's just my opinion, like i said twice in my previous post, and i don't see anything unfair in expressing it.
 
Thanks for the article. I really enjoyed reading it, I learned a lot.

Happy New Years to the CSI Files team. Keep up the good work.:thumbsup:
 
Great interview Kristine. Thanks.
David is always fantastic :)
I don't understand David Rambo's answer about Butterflied/Grissom/Sara.
Why Does he start talk about LH? It's like he answers other question.
 
Thanks, guys! Glad so many liked the interview. :)

Just wanted to point out one clarified quote about the final scene between Grissom and Catherine in "Young Man with a Horn":

A lot of people thought that scene was about Sara; the girl Grissom was talking about, the girl from college days he thought he loved, wasn't Sara.

So that was the girl he chose science over, not Sara. Sorry if there was any confusion over that! I think it'll be interesting to see what Grissom does after he leaves the lab. What are his plans? I kind of wonder if we'll even know after the next episode.
 
I kind of wonder if we'll even know after the next episode.
that's what i'm worried about too. there is a big chance he is just going to finish the case, leave without saying much, and the camera won't follow. i'm starting to doubt whether we'll know he and sara get back together or not. i guess we'll just have to wait till episode 200 for more details.
 
I kind of wonder if we'll even know after the next episode.
that's what i'm worried about too. there is a big chance he is just going to finish the case, leave without saying much, and the camera won't follow. i'm starting to doubt whether we'll know he and sara get back together or not. i guess we'll just have to wait till episode 200 for more details.

But will we even get an answer in that show?

I mean you can't just expect Grissom to vanish into thin as much as he wanted to at times or be a ghost like he was in high school.

Be nice to know. I hate it when they leave things up in air!:scream:
 
First of all, thank you Kristine for posting the interview.

But I was peeved by some of the remarks made by David Rambo.

I can tell you this; a lot of people are saying without Grissom, it won’t be CSI. They are wrong. It won't be Grissom's CSI but it will be an exciting CSI. Fishburne and Marge are dynamite together; this might be our best season ever.

With respect to William Petersen and his fans, Mr. Rambo could have kept his remarks until Jan 15 when Grissom makes his exit. As far as I am concerned CSI is not CSI without Grissom. And to say that it will be a more exciting CSI after Petersen's is pure BS! In previous seasons, where in certain episodes Grissom was absent - most of my friends agreed that it was not that good. It was simply missing Grissom's presence. And to say that Fishburne and Marge are dynamite together - it should be left to the viewers to decide as only the ratings will prove (after Petersen's exit) if CSI is CSI with Grissom or without.

Only William Petersen can make a socially awkward scientist with an affirmation for bugs and rollercoaster being liked by millions of fans.

“It was hard when Sam died, that was hard"

Let me assure you, Mr. Rambo, it was not hard. It was a relieve, that they got rid of him. It was becoming like an episode of Dynasty. The day he got shot – I could only say “Good Riddance"

I am not sure if I want to watch CSI after Petersen’s exit. Please spare us the pain of seeing Lily in future episodes. And that goes for Lindsay too!!

“Grissom and Lady Heather intellectual relationship is so intense. Honestly, I truthfully think there is nothing intellectual about Lady Heather. She is a fraud. Since, it’s the season to be kind – i will call her a tarot reader. She only excels when it comes to topics regarding S&M. The only way she knew how to get DNA of her daughter’s killer is by sleeping with him. The only way she knew how to raise money for her granddaughter’s future education was to put her “life on sale”. Her granddaughter is only 2. It would take another 16 years before she attends university. And if Lady Heather worked hard like any normal person, she would have saved enough to pay for the child’s education.

In 8 years, Grissom had 5 encounters with Lady Heather. I am a DIE HARD FAN of Grissom/William Petersen. I have always wondered why he associates himself with Lady Heather (besides being involved in cases. Catherine is so right about Grissom needing a slap on his face for associating with Lady Heather.

In Season 9 Lady Heather
“Does Sara know you are here? Am I your little secret?

I was so shocked that such sleazy works could come from a therapist. It was obvious she was hoping to be Grissom’s sloppy seconds! In conclusion, they are just glamorising a whore!

BTW – I have to get this off my chest, In Season 7 Leaving Las Vegas, Catherine had gone to question a suspect in jail. Each time the suspect answered her question, she unbuttoned her blouse. That was the most ridiculous and embarrassing and cheapest thrill I have seen on TV. It makes me wonder which script writer wrote it – can anyone please answer?
 
^ i think your post might ignite some negative comments towards Grissom/Billy. :p

Be nice to know. I hate it when they leave things up in air!
me too. i wish they showed more sometimes. on the other hand i would proabably lose interest after a while if they showed too much. if Grissom wasn't back in episode 200, i'm sure they would give us all we wanted, or at least more than now. but since he'll be back they can only throw us a bone and promise to reveal more later.
 
^ lol. She was probably just typing for her mom again. And Marge who? :D

I kind of like it that there's not always a closure on CSI. I think sometimes it's good to leave things to viewer's own imagination/interpretation, although I have to admit that other times I'm dying to know what exactly happens. I guess to me, it all depends on how things are written and played out. :)

As for Catherine's way of getting the prisoner to talk in Leaving Las Vegas (written by Allen McDonald and Carol Mendelsohn)...she solved her case and prevented the court from letting the killer walk away. End of the story. :)
 
Last edited:
Seriously, Marg is gonna kick people's asses if they keep calling her Marge.

And, with respect to m1 and her mom, we get that you are not fans of Lady H and Catherine. But do remember that there are people here who are - no need to be nasty about the characters.

And that way of getting the prisoner to talk - one of the biggest boosts for a writer is to know people are still talking about something they've written. CM and AMcD did an awesome job on that episode - and I bet part of their intention was to get people talking.
 
^ yeah, i don't really agree it was unethical. i mean, please, nobody is an angel and Catherine was quite creative thinking of such way to make Guffy talk. hell, if i was her, i would've probably done the same.

living in today's society i am fascinated that people critique her for unbuttoning two buttons while they themselves watch Rock of Love: Bus (darn, that thing is a reality-porn!) and pretend to be angels online (at least some of them). so unless you're Amish or teleported from 18th century, there is no reason to get outraged. at least that's what i think.
 
With respect to William Petersen and his fans, Mr. Rambo could have kept his remarks until Jan 15 when Grissom makes his exit. As far as I am concerned CSI is not CSI without Grissom. And to say that it will be a more exciting CSI after Petersen's is pure BS! In previous seasons, where in certain episodes Grissom was absent - most of my friends agreed that it was not that good. It was simply missing Grissom's presence. And to say that Fishburne and Marge are dynamite together - it should be left to the viewers to decide as only the ratings will prove (after Petersen's exit) if CSI is CSI with Grissom or without.

Only William Petersen can make a socially awkward scientist with an affirmation for bugs and rollercoaster being liked by millions of fans.

“It was hard when Sam died, that was hard"
Let me assure you, Mr. Rambo, it was not hard. It was a relieve, that they got rid of him. It was becoming like an episode of Dynasty. The day he got shot – I could only say “Good Riddance"

I am not sure if I want to watch CSI after Petersen’s exit. Please spare us the pain of seeing Lily in future episodes. And that goes for Lindsay too!!

“Grissom and Lady Heather intellectual relationship is so intense. Honestly, I truthfully think there is nothing intellectual about Lady Heather. She is a fraud. Since, it’s the season to be kind – i will call her a tarot reader. She only excels when it comes to topics regarding S&M. The only way she knew how to get DNA of her daughter’s killer is by sleeping with him. The only way she knew how to raise money for her granddaughter’s future education was to put her “life on sale”. Her granddaughter is only 2. It would take another 16 years before she attends university. And if Lady Heather worked hard like any normal person, she would have saved enough to pay for the child’s education.

In 8 years, Grissom had 5 encounters with Lady Heather. I am a DIE HARD FAN of Grissom/William Petersen. I have always wondered why he associates himself with Lady Heather (besides being involved in cases. Catherine is so right about Grissom needing a slap on his face for associating with Lady Heather.

In Season 9 Lady Heather
“Does Sara know you are here? Am I your little secret?
I was so shocked that such sleazy works could come from a therapist. It was obvious she was hoping to be Grissom’s sloppy seconds! In conclusion, they are just glamorising a whore!

BTW – I have to get this off my chest, In Season 7 Leaving Las Vegas, Catherine had gone to question a suspect in jail. Each time the suspect answered her question, she unbuttoned her blouse. That was the most ridiculous and embarrassing and cheapest thrill I have seen on TV. It makes me wonder which script writer wrote it – can anyone please answer?

m1304m- In general, I would really recommend toning down your comments. It kind of seems like most of the comments I've read of yours tend to incite other fans, especially us Catherine fans.

You say that DR should refrain from making judgments about what CSI will be like without WP, but then go on to say exactly what you think CSI will be like without WP, calling it "BS." You can't really have it both ways...

As to episodes without WP, I'd have to say that you and your friends were in the minority. I'd recommend checking out the discussion on the CSI Magazine awards on Talk. A lot of people agree that Gum Drops was one of the best episodes. IMO, the ones with Keppler were also excellent and intriguing as they showed us a whole new, controversial side of forensics, with the whole reverse forensics thing.

A lot of fans (including myself) loved Lily. I thought the scene with Sam was heartbreaking, and that the whole Cath/Sam dynamic was very well-done and intriguing. Also, fyi- Lindsay is the NY CSI. Lindsey is Catherine's daughter (I only know because I've made the same mistake myself, so I really don't mean this rudely, just as an fyi).

I'm only going to respond to one point about Lady Heather (the moral/immoral merits of the Dominion are a whole nother topic I don't care to discuss at the moment). You said that if she "worked hard like any normal person, she would have saved enough to pay for the child’s education." I'm not saying that she found the best way to pay for the child's education, but just working hard for 16 years is no guarantee of being able to pay for a college education, at least not in the U.S. and especially if Heather doesn't have a college education herself. Private colleges in the U.S. generally cost between 40k and 50k per year. I go to a school with one of the largest endowments in the world, but its need-based aid still isn't enough to cover my tuition without sending me into debt. I can totally understand Lady Heather's rationale, even if, personally, I wouldn't endorse her method.

^ lol. She was probably just typing for her mom again. And Marge who?

I kind of like it that there's not always a closure on CSI. I think sometimes it's good to leave things to viewer's own imagination/interpretation, although I have to admit that other times I'm dying to know what exactly happens. I guess to me, it all depends on how things are written and played out.

As for Catherine's way of getting the prisoner to talk in Leaving Las Vegas (written by Allen McDonald and Carol Mendelsohn)...she solved her case and prevented the court from letting the killer walk away. End of the story.

I totally agree. I love that about CSI. Leaving it up in the air allows all fans to enjoy it more, especially those who prefer less popular pairings. It lets us imagine what we want to happen, rather than just being stuck with more GSR.

To the comments on Cath's button trick, I think it was a really smart move. IMO, it was a very amusing move to make, since it kind of makes fun of the tendencies of viewers to watch stuff when there's skin showing, not just of suspects. Kind of ironic, especially since it generally goes up against Grey's Anatomy, which seems to rely entirely on sex appeal (I'm hoping bashing Grey's won't really get me in trouble here, and I apologize ahead of time to any Grey's fans who may be reading this).

I have the same build as Catherine and I have totally used that trick, or similar ones, in real life. It was totally worth it. There are a lot of disadvantages to being buxom. If guys are always objectifying you and staring at your boobs, then you might as well get something out of it on occasion and play them. Catherine gets checked out and hit on plenty; I'm happy for her that she used it to her advantage that time.
 
First of all, thank you Kristine for posting the interview.

But I was peeved by some of the remarks made by David Rambo.

I can tell you this; a lot of people are saying without Grissom, it won’t be CSI. They are wrong. It won't be Grissom's CSI but it will be an exciting CSI. Fishburne and Marge are dynamite together; this might be our best season ever.

With respect to William Petersen and his fans, Mr. Rambo could have kept his remarks until Jan 15 when Grissom makes his exit.

Keep in mind, the interview took place before Petersen's exit aired, but after his exit was written and filmed. And if you read Rambo's comments about Petersen, it's obvious how much respect and admiration he has for him and his character.

As far as I am concerned CSI is not CSI without Grissom. And to say that it will be a more exciting CSI after Petersen's is pure BS!

His words were it will be an exciting CSI. He never used the word "more." As for his comment about it being the "best season yet," he noted that they always try to top themselves each season. And really, when a major character exits, that episode should be one of the best ever, to serve as a proper send-off for the character.

I'm a huge fan of Grissom, and I don't think the show will be the same without him. I don't think it will go down the drain, either. You're of course entitled to your opinion, but the same is true of David Rambo. And at the end of the day, this was William Petersen's choice--one it's really impossible to blame him for after he dedicated eight-and-a-half years of his life to CSI.


BTW – I have to get this off my chest, In Season 7 Leaving Las Vegas, Catherine had gone to question a suspect in jail. Each time the suspect answered her question, she unbuttoned her blouse. That was the most ridiculous and embarrassing and cheapest thrill I have seen on TV. It makes me wonder which script writer wrote it – can anyone please answer?

I'll admit, that made me a little uncomfortable as well. At the same time, that's Catherine--that's something she's willing to do. I don't think it was sleazy--Catherine has learned in her life that sometimes you have to be willing to cross lines others wouldn't cross to get something done. It was an in-character moment for her, so while the move is something that could easily come off as cheap, with a character as well-established as Catherine, it felt real and shrewd.

^ lol. She was probably just typing for her mom again.

Let's avoid making personal assumptions about posters and just address their points. And remember that everyone here is entitled to an opinion. Thanks!
 
Back
Top