Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anyone thought that this baby isn't Danny's?
Well, TPTB aren't renowned for their careful nurturing of continuity over the long haul...And this is just a lonnnnng ploy for Lindsay to hook up with Danny, permanently?
Well all know by now Lindsay has her issues and who's to not to say she's obsessed with Danny, because she very well could be. And by getting knocked up by someone else when Danny was with Rikki and then going to Danny when she was pregnant is a very (although bad) risky, but thought out way for a woman who so badly want to be with him.
Ha, we've long noticed Danny's unfortunate inclination to chase Lindsay whenever she pushes him away or treats him like crap... :lol:Yes, at first Danny proposed to Lindsay and she said no, but maybe she had it all planned out and knew he would come back for her.
I was surprised at how conservative they are being with the storyline, not only did they state that Danny would have to be the dad but that they had to have them get married before the birth. Neither Lindsay and certainly not Danny, have come across as conservative people in the past, so not sure if there is some logical reason to this.
There was a statement that this was to be the first CSI baby, though I can't see why that should be an aim of a procedural show.
There was a statement that this was to be the first CSI baby, though I can't see why that should be an aim of a procedural show.
The way it's being touted as the "first CSI baby" is a little silly. The first Crime Scene Investigation baby sounds kinda silly when you spell it out. I'm not so hard-lined that I don't think romance has a place on the show at all, but the way this baby is being touted like a great storyline--and not a convenience because the actress got pregnant--is a little much to swallow.
Actually, the first CSI baby was actually Warrick's and Tina's on the original CSI. But there was controversy on Warrick's behalf if the baby was actually his.
Actually, the first CSI baby was actually Warrick's and Tina's on the original CSI. But there was controversy on Warrick's behalf if the baby was actually his.
Don't you know that doesn't count? It only counts if both parents are CSIs.
Regarding the length of Lindsay's pregnancy, they sort of made it work by implying a time jump. They didn't expressly say time had passed, but they implied it. The season premiere took place in the spring because it was a continuation of the season finale. Then 5.13 "Rush to Judgment" (the one with the dismembered body) showed and pointed out Christmas wrapping paper, as if to imply that we'd caught up to the present time-wise. So presumably, they intend for us to believe that months passed between "The Box" and now. (I don't know when the time jump supposedly happened, but that's as much as my earth logic can get from the situation. )cSiNyFrEaK30 said:
(she is much farther along than Lindsay is, although the writers seem to have no problem assuming that she isn't)