Season 9 *Spoiler Lab* Discussions P3

[Kimbo08]

Okay awesome! Thanks for the heads up!

 

[myfuturecsi]

Does anyone know the source of spoilers? If they do, could they PM it, just in case it can't be posted here? I'd greatly appreciate it.

You mean the bunch of spoilers that NicknGrissom posted? They are over at Tv.com (that link will take you to the ep guide) which is why it was stated that they are subject to change as well. Not that the site can't be trusted, if they have something wrong they are quick to correct it, so I find them to be about 99% reliable.

So does that mean there is a strong possibility (unless the writers go in a different direction) they could be true.

I know I watched a segment on CSI and they often have the writers on the set and even then and there the direction can change.

But these little tidbits are nice.

 

[Nicksfriend]

There is new spoiler out, but subject to change. You can talk about it 'till the writers change it.

season 9, ep. 17: Cold Rats- A body is discovered in a ravine. It turns out to be a casino owner who worked with Catherine's father, Sam Braun.

Seson 9, ep. 18: Mascara- A murder takes place in the world of Mexican wrestling and our CSIs must solve the crime. This is 200th episode.

Season 9, ep. 19: The Case of the Killer Clam-While Catherine, Greg, and Riley investigate a young girl shot to death in a drive-by shooting. Nick and Langston investigate the murder of a millionaire tourist who won big at the slots.

Nick's fans, you will love this one if they don't change it.

Season 9, Ep. 20: Stokes on Duty- While at a crime scene Nick is forced to shoot a suspect after he pulls it gun on him. When the witnesses start to all said that the man was unarmed. Nick is put under investigation. So the rest of the team works to solve the case and clean his name before internal affairs terminates him.

Seaon 9, Ep 21: Case of the Mistaken Idenity- The team arrives at the scene of a triple homicide in a supposedly quiet neighborhood where a little girl witnessed her entire family getting killed. The only thing the team has to go on is the girl's desecripton of a scar on the man's arm. Also, Nick is back on duty after his recent run in with Internal Affairs.

Season 9, Ep. 22: LVPD- After a convict is killed in prison the media starts to sworm and the team is put under the microscope to solve the case.

This one is going to be Part 1 and 2 season finale: I don't know Greg's fans will like this one on Part 2.

Season 9, Ep. 23: It's a Tough Job, but Catherine's gotta do it (1)- In the first part of the two part season finale, am emeber of the drug task force is murdered in an explosion which leads the team to a deadly street gang. Sergeant Curtis helps the team to slove the murder and to take down the gang. Aslo, the lab teachs must take polygraph tests becasue it is suspected that there is a mole inside the lab.

Season 9, Ep. 24: It's a Tough Job, but Raymond's gotta do it (2)- In the conclusion of the two part season finale, the team stands by as Riley and Hodges are held hostage by the gang in the drug house. Greg does something that could end his career as a CSI.

You can talk about this episode 'till they change the title. There is no date on this episode title. I know someone will said this is fake, but just ignored the person that said it and you can talk about it. Remember, it's subject to Change.

I am going to wait before I get my hopes up too high,on another site they have 9x17 as Eye for an Eye and the person who posted it was right on the money with the episode For Warrick....and I don't want the character of Nick tarnished in any way,he is our quiet hero,and I just don't want another Warrick like episode that makes you see the charazterization of Nick Stokes any differently...he's worked too hard over the years to make us see Nick a certain way and I don't want that to change.ever,he is definitely our unsung hero...seems that they could bring back Nick's old Stalker,that guy was the creepiest ever...it would be so great!

 

[Destiny]

You mean the bunch of spoilers that NicknGrissom posted? They are over at Tv.com (that link will take you to the ep guide) which is why it was stated that they are subject to change as well. Not that the site can't be trusted, if they have something wrong they are quick to correct it, so I find them to be about 99% reliable.

So does that mean there is a strong possibility (unless the writers go in a different direction) they could be true.

I know I watched a segment on CSI and they often have the writers on the set and even then and there the direction can change.

But these little tidbits are nice.

Well all Spoilers are subject to change, scenes cut, scenes added, rewrites, etc, etc etc. Nothing is set in stone, what I was saying that I would trust Tv.com because they are responsible enough that if they get mis-information they quickly change it to the correct info making them reliable in my opinion on that front, but spoilers should be taken as speculation because as I have mentioned before until it shows on that episode its not guarenteed.

 

[sincity]

I would like that!

I wonder if sometime in this season they ever refer to Warrick's baby again?

Love to hear more about Warrick's baby. Feeling we are left in the dust on so many dead issues.

Would Love to hear them talk more about all the departed team members.

 

[blackflag]

Nick's fans, you will love this one if they don't change it.

Season 9, Ep. 20: Stokes on Duty- While at a crime scene Nick is forced to shoot a suspect after he pulls it gun on him. When the witnesses start to all said that the man was unarmed. Nick is put under investigation. So the rest of the team works to solve the case and clean his name before internal affairs terminates him.

I am going to wait before I get my hopes up too high,on another site they have 9x17 as Eye for an Eye and the person who posted it was right on the money with the episode For Warrick....and I don't want the character of Nick tarnished in any way,he is our quiet hero,and I just don't want another Warrick like episode that makes you see the charazterization of Nick Stokes any differently...he's worked too hard over the years to make us see Nick a certain way and I don't want that to change.ever,he is definitely our unsung hero...seems that they could bring back Nick's old Stalker,that guy was the creepiest ever...it would be so great!

I just go with the fact that I know George Eads knows the character of Nick Stokes and hope that the writers listen to him. I know he'll fight anything that will take Nick too far out of character. If he didn't shoot the under-sheriff with all the taunting then the only way I can conceivably see Nick shooting someone is if his life is in danger. I don't see him shooting someone just because they pulled a gun on him - he's had that happen before (multiple times).

I do see something like this being used as a lesson in the public eye type of story line - 'should CSI's be carrying guns?'. After all they are civilians. You know they type of thing - public outcry because a CSI had to shoot someone who witnesses say is unarmed. I have to admit, though, it's a storyline I'm kinda getting tired of. Either police or CSI get in trouble and the team has to get them out of trouble.

Susan

 

[myfuturecsi]

Nick's fans, you will love this one if they don't change it.

Season 9, Ep. 20: Stokes on Duty- While at a crime scene Nick is forced to shoot a suspect after he pulls it gun on him. When the witnesses start to all said that the man was unarmed. Nick is put under investigation. So the rest of the team works to solve the case and clean his name before internal affairs terminates him.

I am going to wait before I get my hopes up too high,on another site they have 9x17 as Eye for an Eye and the person who posted it was right on the money with the episode For Warrick....and I don't want the character of Nick tarnished in any way,he is our quiet hero,and I just don't want another Warrick like episode that makes you see the charazterization of Nick Stokes any differently...he's worked too hard over the years to make us see Nick a certain way and I don't want that to change.ever,he is definitely our unsung hero...seems that they could bring back Nick's old Stalker,that guy was the creepiest ever...it would be so great!

I just go with the fact that I know George Eads knows the character of Nick Stokes and hope that the writers listen to him. I know he'll fight anything that will take Nick too far out of character. If he didn't shoot the under-sheriff with all the taunting then the only way I can conceivably see Nick shooting someone is if his life is in danger. I don't see him shooting someone just because they pulled a gun on him - he's had that happen before (multiple times).

I do see something like this being used as a lesson in the public eye type of story line - 'should CSI's be carrying guns?'. After all they are civilians. You know they type of thing - public outcry because a CSI had to shoot someone who witnesses say is unarmed. I have to admit, though, it's a storyline I'm kinda getting tired of. Either police or CSI get in trouble and the team has to get them out of trouble.

Susan

I agree with you guys.

However, in the past, CSI has done quite a good job of forshadowing events. In For Warrick, we see a moment of Nick's rage bubble over when he draw the gun on McKeen and then again in Let It Bleed (?) so this might be the moment where Nick's emotions get the best of him. It can happen to anyone.

However, I'm wondering if there's a scene in which IAB uses Nick's past against him and question his mental stability. I'm thinking of For Gedda when poor Warrick's mistakes are used against him. Will the IAB bring up Nick's burial? His "A Miss" with McKeen? Will they say he's too traumatized to be a CSI?

I do hope these spoilers come true and do hope George doesn't get all hung up on the 'integrity' of his character-with all due respect I think he becomes so worried about his character looking bad to the point where good stories are dropped.

I love the guy anyways...and if there is angst..no one does it better than George!!!:thumbsup:

 

[candygirl1uk]

As to Greg fans, in ep 24 it says he does something that may end his career, now this could be a good thing for Greg, IF the writers do right this could be his storyline, and the fact that its in the last ep of the season, with hopes of a possible season ten lets hope that this is his time starting to come into play.

Well I was just thinking, it has never been confirmed if Eric signed a one year or two year contract extension. They mentioned everyone else but him in those articles. It is possible they might write the story for him in case he does not come back for the next season. Personally I would cry if he did not but it is just a thought.

WOW, no say its not soo... I hope Eric does stay in CSI. CSI without Eric- just wont be worth watching anymore.

But, IF the writers do it correctly, Eric will still be in CSI.

OR does that mean a bigger different part for his screen character Greg?

I wish i didnt read it now- now im sad incase he leaves.

 

[wlk68]

Also, the lab techs must take polygraph tests because it is suspected that there is a mole inside the lab.

I'm really tired of the "mole in the lab" plot device. It's been used in all three CSIs. Can't they come up with something original?

 

[NHRFan]

They always copy each other.

Remeber guys, you can talk about the spoiler 'till they change it. It's not official date. We may not see Stokes on Duty, they may change it, even thought it sound good. Part 2, Greg does something may cause his career, it may not mean nothing. We will just have to wait and see 'till the official date.

 

[candygirl1uk]

True, spoilers are just that spoilers and it does not have to be anything concrete.

Just worrying is all, cause as far as I can see, Greg really hasnt had that much air time- or greater character development.

 

[Wojo]

My god that's a lot of spoiler information at once. It seems a bit fishy to me ,Its for that reason I don't know if its reliable. Plus its the same site that said Nick would find Warrick slumped over in his car after the shooting.

I am really nervous about the Greg spoiler (if its true), I can't stand the thought of him not returning next season. A someone mentioned we don't know the status of Eric's contract so I'm a bit freaked out.

 

[Nicksfriend]

They always copy each other.

Remeber guys, you can talk about the spoiler 'till they change it. It's not official date. We may not see Stokes on Duty, they may change it, even thought it sound good. Part 2, Greg does something may cause his career, it may not mean nothing. We will just have to wait and see 'till the official date.

But didn't Carol Mendlesohn say that someone dies in the last episode...in an interview I believe....which could mean anything.

 

[NHRFan]

Yes, Carol did said that last year or two. Someone in the lab will be killed off, I think it alway been done with, I don't think they will doing it again that soon, Warrick got killed off beginning of the show.

 

[beaujolais]

My god that's a lot of spoiler information at once. Its for that reason I don't know if its reliable. Plus its the same site that said Nick would find Warrick slumped over in his car after the shooting.

I agree. It's also the site that told us episode 9x10 would be called "The Mole" and dealt with the team trying to find Warrick's killer.

Kinda smells hinky to me.