Angel. I know that some of the people get called by their last name but Flack always called her Jess and I liked that. Him calling her Angel while talking to Mac didn't seem right to me.
i dunno, it kind of worked for me - i thought it was because maybe calling her jess would make it harder for him to get his head around, whereas calling her angell is a bit more impersonal and mentally distances himself from what happened, thus enabling him to deal with it a bit easier at least for the time being.
I love that Mac didn't want to know any details about Flack's actions. The less he knows the better because we all know Mac doesn't do well keeping secrets. He's way to righteous to let something like that slip away unchallenged.
agreed!
Maybe my expectations are too high.
ha, just like stella's in
it happened to me
Mac shut him down. "That's between you and your God," Mac said. I'm sorry but WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT???? Mac has been known to reach out to people. Look at all the support he gave Danny when he found out Lindsay was pregnant. Yea, it look a while, but still. Why all of a sudden was Mac so cold to Flack???
It was a good idea, to have Flack floundering, but I really didn't like the fact that he said he had to earn Mac's trust again. AGAIN WTF :wtf: Why couldn't Flack just tell Mac he was hurting and why couldn't Mac sympathize???? UMM HELLO CLAIRE????? Sorry but that whole scene rubbed me the wrong way, either that or I've had too much coffee already this morning.
i disagree - i know others (and i) have said this already but what the hell. i think mac *knew* exactly what flack had done before flack even opened his mouth, or at least very soon after. but if flack had said it out loud mac would, in his moral righteousness or something, have been obliged to make it official. as long as flack doesn't actually state what happened, no one need ever know. also there's the (somewhat more selfish for mac) question that if flack said it and mac agreed to keep it quiet but it later came out some other way, both their careers would be on the line as it would be deemed that mac had known about it and done nothing. if it had been a minor misdemeanour that wouldn't be so bad, but for something like that mac needed to make sure it was only ever implicit. i agree that the way he said it, using the lines about god and priests, was maybe a tad ott, but the point was fair enough.
i don't think there was a lack of sympathy, i think he was sympathetic - iirc, apart from in
blink, it's never really been officially established whether mac went off the rails after 9/11 - we know he was pretty upset and all but it's never been said outright that he did the same things flack has been. but that aside, i think mac's been fairly sympathetic about flack all along - he's obviously been concerned for a few eps, and this ep he covered flack at work, expressed concern to stella and danny, then traipsed off to terrence's and, in between all the godbothering, actually did express that everyone was sympathetic and concerned, rather than just pissed off. i think he just realised that the softly-softly approach that they'd implied over the last few weeks was failing dismally and that it was time to get a bit tough. or even a lot tough!
this, basically:
I think the reason why Mac doesn't want to hear what's going on with Don is because he knows already.. But if Don confess then he will have to report it, because he definitly crossed the line in shouting this man.
that's why he told him "I'm not your prest" meaning if you need to tell someone choose someone who doesn't get you in more trouble.
I must pause my uncharacteristic praise of Mac Taylor
please do, i'm about to die of shock :lol::lol:
The fact that Flack failed to recognize the threat from the muggers until it was too late speaks to how badly he'd been compromised.
oh, i think he *did* recognise it but he just didn't care, in a "bring it on" kind of way. often people who get into that state actually want some kind of violent action against them - they wouldn't necessarily start anything deliberately but they might be antagonistic and if such a situation arose would be a bit like "well, i don't give a crap what you do, you can't really make me feel any worse, so fire away!" - although it's fair to say that having been that way myself a million times, i would automatically read it that way, but the indifference on flack's face, and the dozy smile when the two women got up to go to the next carriage, suggests (to me anyway) that it was more something along those lines than a lack of awareness.
I do, wonder, however, how Terrance just happened to be on hand to save Flack. Was he following Flack?
i agree - right train, right carriage, right moment, sure....
- I wonder if Mac chews up Hawkes the same way when he doesn't put the toilet seat down. Oh to be a fly in the wall in Mac's apartment. :lol:
hah, me too!!