CSI:NY Spoiler Discussion - Bring on Season 6!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think the reference to Mac's father in 6.02 necessairily means he's getting another nemesis. His father was referenced in both Mrs Azrael and Yahrzeit which were episodes that had nothing to do with his having a nemesis. Could be it just comes up because of the particular case they're working on, or maybe he talks about his dad to Flack - about feeling powerless in a hospital, much like Flack must've felt in Pay Up. A Mac nemesis so soon after Dunbrook would be a little too soon.
I don't mind Mac getting another nemesis as long as the whole team can be involved and the nemesis is interesting, but it would be great if the shooter turned out to be someone with a grudge against the whole team (the Irish guys from Snow Day would be a good example, unlikely given the time difference, but they'd be pissed at Mac, Flack, Stella and Hawkes, possibly Danny too) or the Tanglewood boys with a grudge against Danny. I'd personally love to see someone coming after Flack for some reason. Maybe the guy he shot had a brother or something, or some scumbag he put away gets out of jail.

Rikki coming back or Kaye being a problem for DL would be brilliant. I'm kind of hoping Lindsay will decide to leave or at least cut her hours after the shooting, and Kaye will be coming in to replace her.
 
i'm kinda have a problem today i want it to be september (god i can't wait) but then i'm kissing the summer away lol thats it CSI NY is gonna have to be on all year around like eastender (UK i know some won't have a clue what that is)

I have an idea how the season opener might start or should............

all the gang showing one person at a time in a shot stood around a hole wearing black and crying making us think it's one of them that's died but really it's angel's funeral?
Click to expand...

it's a good way to keep us on jess i really hope it get's talked about she died doing her job and that should be noted from all till at least 6.14? then maybe just flack for the rest of the season before he meets angel's twin sister she, her family or don didn't know she had.
 
danny-lindsay4e said:
i'm kinda have a problem today i want it to be september (god i can't wait) but then i'm kissing the summer away lol thats it CSI NY is gonna have to be on all year around like eastender (UK i know some won't have a clue what that is)
Click to expand...

i don't think i could cope if csi ny was on as much as eastenders - the mac-loveliness overdose might just kill me, but also because it would mean the quality would have to come down (to stay on budget), and the cheese factor would go into overdrive. don't get me wrong, i love easties, i watch every single episode and really enjoy it, but it is a bit silly, a bit crap and the acting is terrible and i wouldn't want csi to go that way!

maybe they should try a crossover - mac and stella investigating who spilled my pint, prime suspects are minty, big mo and phil? :lol:

sorry, that was a bit ot - i'm just feeling bereft of csi right now!
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Cyn-B-Demented:
Though it would be highly unreal that it wouldn't affect him considering how Flack is. Or just to think that killing someone wouldn't have any impact on a person is pretty unreal too, even if it was for revenge. I would expect remorse on some level about the act. Or trouble living with the duality that the person knows she's capable of killing out of revenge but would never commit murder just for fun.

But I don't expect Flack would get into trouble for shooting him, really. Danny had his back all along! They probably work a story that would clear Flack if questions were asked. And then Danny comforted Flack that's for sure lol :devil:
Click to expand...
Definitely. I'm not expecting the hardcore IAB investigation into that military-guy's death, and Danny would totally have Flack's back, but I really can't see any way that murder isn't going to weigh on Flack's conscience (it was basically murder, what he did).

Hahaha, you didn't buy F/A? :lol: Why? And it's true, they were not cliché on four legs, surely not soul mates but they could have headed for a serious relationship. I would have prefer to have them as a couple on CSI:NY than D/L that's for sure.
Click to expand...
Okay, part of it might've just been Angell-hate :p But honestly, to me their relationship seemed to have about as much substance as Angell's character did - very little to none at all. Did they ever have one personal conversation that didn't revolve around sex once they got together? We didn't even find out that they actually cared about each other beyond the bedroom until the episode before Angell died (and even then I was iffy, but okay, if the writers say so...:rolleyes:). At best I thought it was a fling - I really didn't see them headed for a serious relationship. I probably would've been able to stomach it slightly better than I do D/L, though. Although it's just easier, because Angell's appearances were fairly limited anyway.

Originally Posted by lowey:
I agree with you. Eddie was so so good in the Finale...you could see all the struggles going on behind his eyes...he was brilliant. And if the writers give him good stuff to get stuck into in S6, it could be amazing. But you know what they're like with continuity!
Click to expand...
No no no no no - I'm totally plugging my ears and humming loudly on the continuity issue. I mean, these are professional writers - they have to know they can't just sweep Flack's moral struggle under the rug! And for the most part, death has always been handled well and believably on CSI (the way they handled Warrick's death was just amazing, Speed and Aiden got great follow-up, even Holly Gribbs's death was keenly felt).
 
Last edited:
i don't think i could cope if csi ny was on as much as eastenders - the mac-loveliness overdose might just kill me, but also because it would mean the quality would have to come down (to stay on budget), and the cheese factor would go into overdrive. don't get me wrong, i love easties, i watch every single episode and really enjoy it, but it is a bit silly, a bit crap and the acting is terrible and i wouldn't want csi to go that way!

maybe they should try a crossover - mac and stella investigating who spilled my pint, prime suspects are minty, big mo and phil? :lol:

sorry, that was a bit ot - i'm just feeling bereft of csi right now!
Click to expand...

yeah i get what your saying i'm just having a really bad withdrawn day lol
i reckon it was phil he's back on the bottle lol.
 
Not so buzz about NY...

Can you tell us if someone actually gets hurt in the CSI: NY Season 6 opener? Everyone is talking about the rumor of Danny being shot in the drive-by. — Catie
TIM: A show rep promises the premiere will take viewers on a dazzling ride and answer many questions — including who lives and who dies. But CSI: NY needs to keep Danny around for storylines involving his and Lindsay's attempts to balance work, romance, and a new baby who keeps him up at nights. He'll only wish he was dead.
Click to expand...

from TVGUIDE
 
Maya316 said:
Definitely. I'm not expecting the hardcore IAB investigation into that military-guy's death, and Danny would totally have Flack's back, but I really can't see any way that murder isn't going to weigh on Flack's conscience (it was basically murder, what he did).
Click to expand...

Excuse my ignorance on abbreviations and whatnot again :lol: but... IAB? Internal Affairs Something? :confused: lol

I don't know what we will see of Flack's struggle in S6, but I think it's obvious that it will weight in his conscience because it's murder like you said. He's righteous as a detective and gets the job done when the situation calls for it (Snow Day, etc), but this was done on a personal level. I sympathize for him and understand why he did it but it doesn't make it right in the end. After all, he locks up people for the same murder motive! I wonder if he'll confide in his sister?! The oh-so-perfect brother ain't so perfect anymore.

Okay, part of it might've just been Angell-hate :p
Click to expand...
Hahaha :lol: Thought it might be some of that too lol I remembered you saying you didn't like her!

But honestly, to me their relationship seemed to have about as much substance as Angell's character did - very little to none at all. Did they ever have one personal conversation that didn't revolve around sex once they got together? We didn't even find out that they actually cared about each other beyond the bedroom until the episode before Angell died (and even then I was iffy, but okay, if the writers say so...:rolleyes:). At best I thought it was a fling - I really didn't see them headed for a serious relationship. I probably would've been able to stomach it slightly better than I do D/L, though. Although it's just easier, because Angell's appearances were fairly limited anyway.
Click to expand...
I think I got the feeling they could have been serious after the dialogue between Flack and Angell's father. Compared to Danny, he could have waited for things to naturally evolved between them. Or not. We'll never know! And now that you mentioned it, I think it's because Angell wasn't in every episode that I had been/would have been more tolerant for that couple. Although, for these kind of shows, I prefer if it is played out like it was for Warrick Brown on CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. Over the phone conversations, little teasing about girlfriends and relationship with his chums, etc. We barely seen her, if my memory's not failing me again lol

No no no no no - I'm totally plugging my ears and humming loudly on the continuity issue. I mean, these are professional writers - they have to know they can't just sweep Flack's moral struggle under the rug! And for the most part, death has always been handled well and believably on CSI (the way they handled Warrick's death was just amazing, Speed and Aiden got great follow-up, even Holly Gribbs's death was keenly felt).
Click to expand...
Yeah, they're professional writers yet sometimes they write stuff that ain't so professional :lol: But that's just being harsh with them. Beside a few stuff that annoys me, they're doing an amazing job with the CSIs.

But you're right about the deaths on CSIs. They got all great follow-up! I really liked how they did it for Speedle and Warrick! Though it was almost all covered up for Angell in the S5 finale... the solved her murder, she got her wake and she got that article in the newspaper... unless there's a surprise in store with that story line? So, it would only leave Flack's struggle and I'm just worried how little they might give it space for S6 :(. Though I hope Angell's death was also their way of digging more into Flack for the next season. It just screams for it lol

under_cover said:
Not so buzz about NY...

Quote:
Can you tell us if someone actually gets hurt in the CSI: NY Season 6 opener? Everyone is talking about the rumor of Danny being shot in the drive-by. — Catie
TIM: A show rep promises the premiere will take viewers on a dazzling ride and answer many questions — including who lives and who dies. But CSI: NY needs to keep Danny around for storylines involving his and Lindsay's attempts to balance work, romance, and a new baby who keeps him up at nights. He'll only wish he was dead.

from TVGUIDE
Click to expand...

Thank you so much for that spoiler! So, Lindsay gets hurt? Mac? Though I'm not sure if that makes sense with the 6.02 spoiler that came out recently... didn't read it...
 
"Not so buzz" is right, under_cover. :rolleyes: Do any other shows get 'spoilers' that don't actually give them any information, or is it just us? :lol:
 
I don't know how old Mac is in the flashback, but if the ages are close enough, I'd love to see Gary's son Mac playing younger screen-Mac.
 
Again with the D/L :scream: Make it stop.

I do hope the premiere will answer a lot of questions for us because from the 6.02 spoilers so far, it just seems so normal. I would hate for it not to fully satisfy and then the next episode......blah.
 
Danny cannot die. That was pretty obvious, even though most of us was scared of it happening, because of the D/L thing and what the producers had said they had in store for them in S6. It might sound cruel (or not?) but I would have liked Lindsay to die and leave Danny a single father. 'Would have been interesting, but maybe too dramatic for this kind of show.

CdfSjaI said:
I would hate for it not to fully satisfy and then the next episode......blah.
Click to expand...
Yeah... I'm worried about that too. I guess we'll have to keep hoping for the best lol

ETA
And I think they're only spoiling about D/L to make sure all the fans tune-in for the season premiere.
 
Really, they should kick out every other member of the cast. After all, who needs Mac, Stella, Flack, Adam and all the rest? We have Danny, Lindsay and Lucy! Yesss! *pukes* I also suggest they rename the series and call it "CSI: D/L", since now each and every thing revolves around them. Well, except for Mac's storyline. He can stay, I guess, but only because he blessed Danny and Lindsay's holy union.

Why, yes, I am pissed off!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top