CSI: New York--'Murder Sings The Blues'

CSI Files

Captain
Synopsis:

Mac and Peyton's celebration of his birthday is interrupted by a page to the subway, where a young woman has died, the apparent victim of a biological or chemical agent. Blood covers her face and body, but the cause of her death was multiple organ failure. Mac and Detective Angell trace the 911 call that alerted them to her body to a man named Randy Kearns, the organizer of spontaneous "Blue Train" parties. He maintains his innocence, and Lindsay finds DNA evidence on the woman's body that links her to a man convicted of attempted manslaughter six years ago: James McQuinn. Mac worked the case, and believes McQuinn, now a successful businessman, has something to do with the murder. The case becomes complicated when an origami crane found on the body has Dr. Hawkes' number on it, and the CSI recognizes her as a woman he met at a party and had coffee with.

Stella, Danny and Flack investigate the murder of Grant Jordan, a rich bachelor found dead in his "swim gym" by his "Roommate," a young woman from a hired maid service who cleans in lingerie. A blue contact leads the CSIs to Veronica Perez, Grant's former maid, who had a fixation on Grant and was planning her wedding to him, unbeknownst to the playboy. When he found out about her plans, he fired her. Granules of red sand and chalk on Grant's forehead lead the CSIs to Daniel Gecko, an artist who lived next door to Grant. Fed up with Grant's noisy swim gym, Gecko confronted Grant and, in a bout of rage, pushed him under water and drowned him in the swim gym.

Peyton mentions to Mac that Hawkes knew Jenny, not realizing this is new information to Mac. The angry CSI confronts Hawkes and pulls him from the case. Lindsay determines the substance that killed Jenny was Dimethylhydrazine, and finds trace elements of it on shattered glass found near the body. Mac and Lindsay reconstruct the glass, finding three sets of prints on it--Jenny's, Randy's, and an unknown person whose ridges lack detail. Mac interrogates Randy, suspecting that the poison in the flask was meant for him. Analysis of the elements in the poison leads Mac to McQuinn, who is sporting a chemical burn on his hand. McQuinn, envious of Randy's train party business, plotted to murder the man, but was foiled when Jenny seized the flask meant for Randy and drank from it. Mac tells Hawkes the case is closed before joining Peyton at the vending machines for a continuation of his birthday celebration.

Analysis:

Though the cases were on the weak side, the overall impression "Murder Sings the Blues" left me with was "it's about time." It's about time the criminally under-utilized Hawkes got some development. It's about time Mac Taylor did something less than perfect. It's about time the delightful Peyton Driscoll showed up again. Those three elements made up for the weaknesses in both cases.

<HR ALIGN="CENTER" SIZE="1" WIDTH="45\%" COLOR="#007BB5">

To read the full reviews, please click here.<center></center>
 
Funny, I'm a huge Mac fan but I've never seen him as perfect. I think he acts like a cold bastard most of the time and he can be *such* a tightass. But yeah, it's about time they showed someone standing up to him other than Stella. This ep gets a bonus coz he got hit on both ends: professionally and personally ;)
 
^Yeah, I guess in this case what stood out to me was that Mac did kind of cross a nebulous moral line. He can be a cold bastard, but usually when he chews someone out, he's right. In this case, he wasn't wrong with the way he handled Hawkes, but he didn't tell Peyton right away that he didn't know Hawkes knew the victim, and that was a tad underhanded of him. I liked seeing that he isn't always perfectly moral in everything he does--it made him seem more human in this ep. I also did like that Peyton stood up to him--I really enjoy her character.
 
But why should Mac have told Peyton that she'd dropped Hawkes in it? Mac is the boss and it's up to him to run his crime lab. His priority was the case and how Hawkes may have compromised it by not admitting that he had a personal connection to the victim.
I don't see why he should have said to his girlfriend "Oh you just got a colleague of yours in trouble". Just because they're sleeping with each other, doesn't give her any say in the way he runs his lab and deals with his people. And maybe Mac wanted to confront Hawkes before Peyton went running to him and warned him that Mac knew about his deception.

As for Mac confronting Hawkes in public, well maybe that was more about letting people know what was acceptable or not in terms of work, than saving Hawkes's feelings.
Hawkes screwed up. He should have mentioned the connection between him and the vic. And now everybody in the lab knows that if they find themselves working on somebody they know, the first thing they need to do is tell Mac. It's unfortunate for Hawkes that he was the one yelled at, but it's a lesson they all need to learn. (come on, how many times have viewers complained about a CSI not recusing themselves from a case they have a personal connection to? Finally somebody is getting called on it)

As for Peyton. Meh, I don't like her anyway, and if this situation leads her to believe that it's better if she and Mac don't work together, I'll be a very happy viewer. From my reading of the episode (and that's all I've done as yet, since I won't see it for ages), Peyton seems more concerned that people will see her as a stool pigeon, or somebody who blabs things to Mac.
So she dropped Hawkes in it. Big deal. If Hawkes had told Mac about the connection like he should have, then it wouldn't have mattered. And Peyton probably assumed that he had.
Anyway, I might feel differently on seeing the episode.
 
^I don't think there was a professional reason for Mac to tell Peyton she'd given him new information, but I think on a personal level, it was a bit more nebulous. Mac is usually so honorable and upright, so it did strike me as a little off for him personally not to tell Peyton he didn't know. I got why she felt betrayed.

As for not liking her, I'd wait until you see the ep. Peyton was more worried about betraying Hawkes than she was about being seen as a snitch. I don't think the latter crossed her mind at all.

Hawkes did do the wrong thing by not telling Mac about his connection to the victim, but I can see how he'd see it as tenuous at best. It's not like she was a good friend or even someone he was dating--he met her for one night. I can see why Mac was pissed, but I can sympathize with Hawkes' point of view as well.
 
Back
Top